baddog Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Porter said: Google search on illuminati bot: Whether illuminatibot (often handled by the X handle This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) is "legit" depends entirely on what you are looking for. It is a highly popular social media account known for posting content related to conspiracy theories, the occult, and "hidden truths". Reliability and Content Pseudoscience & Fact-Checking: The account is frequently flagged by community notes and fact-checkers for spreading pseudoscience and misinformation. It often posts sensationalist claims regarding "Big Pharma," the New World Order, and historical "hidden truths" that lack empirical evidence. Entertainment Value: For followers interested in alternative history, symbolism, and secret societies, the account serves as a major hub for discussion and community-building. Cryptocurrency: There is a cryptocurrency token associated with the name (BOT), but it has a very low market capitalization (around $11K as of May 2026), making it a high-risk or "meme" asset. Digital Presence X (Twitter): Its primary platform, where it has gained significant traction for its "anti-establishment" stance. Website: The This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up serves as an archive for its videos, interviews, and deep dives into secret agendas. Social Media Reach: It maintains a presence across This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up and This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up to share its visual content and theories. Summary: If you are looking for an authoritative source of scientific or historical fact, the account is widely considered not reliable. If you are looking for conspiracy-themed entertainment or "alternative" perspectives, it is a legitimately popular influencer in that specific niche. Quote
Porter Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 4 minutes ago, baddog said: Google search on illuminati bot: Whether illuminatibot (often handled by the X handle This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up ) is "legit" depends entirely on what you are looking for. It is a highly popular social media account known for posting content related to conspiracy theories, the occult, and "hidden truths". Reliability and Content Pseudoscience & Fact-Checking: The account is frequently flagged by community notes and fact-checkers for spreading pseudoscience and misinformation. It often posts sensationalist claims regarding "Big Pharma," the New World Order, and historical "hidden truths" that lack empirical evidence. Entertainment Value: For followers interested in alternative history, symbolism, and secret societies, the account serves as a major hub for discussion and community-building. Cryptocurrency: There is a cryptocurrency token associated with the name (BOT), but it has a very low market capitalization (around $11K as of May 2026), making it a high-risk or "meme" asset. Digital Presence X (Twitter): Its primary platform, where it has gained significant traction for its "anti-establishment" stance. Website: The This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up serves as an archive for its videos, interviews, and deep dives into secret agendas. Social Media Reach: It maintains a presence across This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up and This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up to share its visual content and theories. Summary: If you are looking for an authoritative source of scientific or historical fact, the account is widely considered not reliable. If you are looking for conspiracy-themed entertainment or "alternative" perspectives, it is a legitimately popular influencer in that specific niche. I guess this global capital markets site is illegitimate too. Either way main st is getting screwed as usual. Quote
Porter Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 14 minutes ago, baddog said: It has to start somewhere. Crumbs?? Say what you want. I gave Trump credit at $1.99 gallon and I am going to give him credit at $3.89 gallon. If you don’t like it keep scrolling. Quote
baddog Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago I did say what I wanted. A 12% drop in price is not crumbs. You could have scrolled past also. Quote
Porter Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 32 minutes ago, baddog said: I did say what I wanted. A 12% drop in price is not crumbs. You could have scrolled past also. Funny I don’t see that reflection at the pump. It could go back up 15% tomorrow so your point means nothing to be grateful about. I have a friend that owns a a/c company that told me this past week that from the beginning of March this year to end of May there will be a 30% increase on central ac units. So you can paint this turd of economy as pretty as you want but affordability is not happening currently. Quote
baddog Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago Just trying to post some positives, but when people want to live in the negative, everything is useless. A/C systems have always been ridiculously overpriced and are designed to last 5 years. Quote
Reagan Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago 41 minutes ago, Porter said: Funny I don’t see that reflection at the pump. It could go back up 15% tomorrow so your point means nothing to be grateful about. I have a friend that owns a a/c company that told me this past week that from the beginning of March this year to end of May there will be a 30% increase on central ac units. So you can paint this turd of economy as pretty as you want but affordability is not happening currently. Gas station owners ultimately set the gas prices! Plus there are other factors that contribute to the prices also like taxes. Quote
OlDawg Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, Porter said: Funny I don’t see that reflection at the pump. It could go back up 15% tomorrow so your point means nothing to be grateful about. I have a friend that owns a a/c company that told me this past week that from the beginning of March this year to end of May there will be a 30% increase on central ac units. So you can paint this turd of economy as pretty as you want but affordability is not happening currently. You can thank Biden and the Greenies for the A/C price increase. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Reagan and thetragichippy 2 Quote
Porter Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 1 minute ago, OlDawg said: You can thank Biden and the Greenies for the A/C price increase. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Trumps been in office over a year. You mean his administration with the trifecta couldn’t address this issue? DCT 1 Quote
OlDawg Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Porter said: Trumps been in office over a year. You mean his administration with the trifecta couldn’t address this issue? Not sure where Zeldin sits on this issue. I know EPA has rolled back quite a bit. They did save many of our other appliances. Especially gas appliances. I'm not sure why they are forcing us to use a refrigerant that's a known flammable. Doesn't make much sense to me. But, not much in government regulations ever does... Quote
OlDawg Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Porter said: Trumps been in office over a year. You mean his administration with the trifecta couldn’t address this issue? I'd have to check the status of these Bills. Chances are--with all the other fighting--they're still sitting around somewhere. (EDIT: Congressional Record shows both Bills discussed have passed the House. It doesn't say where they're at in the Senate.) This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
OlDawg Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago Looking into the history of the cost increases in residential a/c units takes one back to 2016 and the Obama Administration. In 2016, Obama signed on to a Global Greenhouse Gas Treaty that required the phase-out of 410-A refrigerants. This change meant total redesign of all HVAC units to accept the new refrigerant which is considered mildly flammable. It required all new safety regulations, testing, and training as well. The regulation was hanging around while firms redesigned and retrained. Biden implemented the policy ahead of schedule to take effect in January 2025. It would be too late to void the new regulations now as every manufacturer has already changed their designs, training, and cities have updated their required safety codes, etc. We're stuck with it. No more units with the older refrigerants can be sold. Although, current units can be serviced as long as parts remain available. Obviously, prices will increase as part stock diminishes, and--eventually--repair parts will probably cease being manufactured. This is a perfect example of Federal Regulations costing the public major dollars that may never be recouped by the individual. The two Bills discussed in the above post are an attempt to keep the Feds from regulating any more of our home appliances by fiat. baddog 1 Quote
baddog Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, OlDawg said: Looking into the history of the cost increases in residential a/c units takes one back to 2016 and the Obama Administration. In 2016, Obama signed on to a Global Greenhouse Gas Treaty that required the phase-out of 410-A refrigerants. This change meant total redesign of all HVAC units to accept the new refrigerant which is considered mildly flammable. It required all new safety regulations, testing, and training as well. The regulation was hanging around while firms redesigned and retrained. Biden implemented the policy ahead of schedule to take effect in January 2025. It would be too late to void the new regulations now as every manufacturer has already changed their designs, training, and cities have updated their required safety codes, etc. We're stuck with it. No more units with the older refrigerants can be sold. Although, current units can be serviced as long as parts remain available. Obviously, prices will increase as part stock diminishes, and--eventually--repair parts will probably cease being manufactured. This is a perfect example of Federal Regulations costing the public major dollars that may never be recouped by the individual. The two Bills discussed in the above post are an attempt to keep the Feds from regulating any more of our home appliances by fiat. Going back much further, they got away from the bell/domed compressors for quieter, more efficient styles. They increased the RPMs which severely decreased the life span. Then later, like you said, they phased out Freon 22 (and CFCs) due to Ozone depletion. Quote
TheMissingBand Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 4.09/gal for regular at Brookshire’s in Zavalla this evening. Quote
DCT Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 7 hours ago, Boyz N Da Hood said: But but biden! 😂 Sad but true. 17 months into this administration and yet the old administration is blamed for the economy, war, and health care when the MAGA voted for a King who promised “Everything Big and Beautiful I tell ya the most beautiful thing you every seen.” Please, let us not mention 2020. Quote
Boyz N Da Hood Posted 6 minutes ago Report Posted 6 minutes ago 1 hour ago, DCT said: Sad but true. 17 months into this administration and yet the old administration is blamed for the economy, war, and health care when the MAGA voted for a King who promised “Everything Big and Beautiful I tell ya the most beautiful thing you every seen.” Please, let us not mention 2020. Man they still talking bout Obama! 💪🏾 November can't get here quick enough, not like this administration getting anything done anyway DCT 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.