DCT Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 15 minutes ago, Porter said: 👏👏👏👏 Now the governor and mayor of Minnesota and Minneapolis want to cooperate. Lol Violent protesters will always be met with the least amount of force necessary to subdue an individual. That is the law. Violent protester is your probable cause. That law has always been on the books. Quote
OlDawg Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago As my background is military/‘foreign affairs’ oriented and engineering—not law enforcement—I was interested in any SCOTUS rulings on distance requirements during an active law enforcement activity. I wasn’t sure of it myself. I just always tried to stay back. Clearly, Good wasn’t following these guidelines, and Pretti is still not clear as—in the Good incident—the first videos only pick up at the confrontation, and don’t show the full interaction. Pretti was obviously on scene before the widely circulated videos begin. What was he doing? Was he interacting with anyone? In the rush for each ‘side’ to claim the narrative, videos are being presented that only show what the videographer wants to show. A layman’s breakdown of distance rulings and rights: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Big girl Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 24 minutes ago, OlDawg said: As my background is military/‘foreign affairs’ oriented and engineering—not law enforcement—I was interested in any SCOTUS rulings on distance requirements during an active law enforcement activity. I wasn’t sure of it myself. I just always tried to stay back. Clearly, Good wasn’t following these guidelines, and Pretti is still not clear as—in the Good incident—the first videos only pick up at the confrontation, and don’t show the full interaction. Pretti was obviously on scene before the widely circulated videos begin. What was he doing? Was he interacting with anyone? In the rush for each ‘side’ to claim the narrative, videos are being presented that only show what the videographer wants to show. A layman’s breakdown of distance rulings and rights: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Did you look at the video? Quote
Big girl Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 11 hours ago, Reagan said: No sarcasm. Without any video, it’s my opinion that she was shot by a rogue cop. There is a video. Reagan 1 Quote
OlDawg Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Big girl said: Did you look at the video? I have seen multiple videos in both cases. Have you read the link I posted? I stand by my statement that—in both cases—the deceased and others were performing illegal actions according to the courts. Just the acts of whistling, yelling, distracting LEO’s, or encroaching on an area is illegal according to the courts. Does that mean Good and/or Pretti should have been shot? IMHO…I’d think there could have been a lesser alternative chosen. But, I’m not into second-guessing someone in a conflict situation. I’ve been there in slightly different situations. Although, I will say my situation was me or them. Different. Quote
baddog Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Woman picks up flash bang grenade to throw back at ICE. It goes off in her hand. Liberals blame the grenade and lack of medics on scene……. Quote
Reagan Posted 55 minutes ago Report Posted 55 minutes ago 10 hours ago, UT alum said: That argument has zero credibility. If there had not been radicals in the Capitol on January 6, 2021, no cops would have been killed. Radicals exist. That don’t excuse murder. I know facts tend to confuse liberals! From the article: “According to Jeanne Massey, a neighbor, Pretti was part of a “Signal ICE” group chat of volunteers who organized a sophisticated operation to track ICE activity in real time and alert each other when agents were in the area. These folks patrol streets, blow whistles, alert residents, and film operations to disrupt arrests. That puts him not on the sidelines but plugged into the very network that coordinated responses to federal enforcement operations.” Fact: if he was not there he would still be alive. Fact: if he was there to peacefully protest he would still be alive. Fact: he came with a gun. That’s ok. His intentions were to attack law enforcement. Planning to use the gun? Don’t know. As it says in the article, he was part of the radical Signal ICE group chat. So, fact — everything he pre planned got him this sad result! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted 52 minutes ago Report Posted 52 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Big girl said: There is a video. Clarify for me: the Ashley Babbitt murder, you were for law enforcement? And what happened with these two people you are against law enforcement? baddog 1 Quote
baddog Posted 48 minutes ago Report Posted 48 minutes ago 20 hours ago, baddog said: Here ya go leftists. This is what you follow. He is going to get more people killed and you damn sure can’t blame the police…. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I have since seen a video of this same antifa guy. He is a gay cross-dresser. That should make the liberals love him even more. You can look it up. I refuse to post his sickness. Quote
Reagan Posted 47 minutes ago Report Posted 47 minutes ago Why the lame stream media has no credibility! From the article: “Alex Pretti has been all over the news since he was shot while engaged with Customers and Border Protection officers in Minneapolis. The fury over CBP and ICE in the dysfunctional city has leftists attempting to elevate the armed insurgent’s status to a combination of martyr and saint. MS NOW took their brainwashing to the next level by adding beautification to the mix. They heavily enhanced his headshot and displayed the new and improved Pretti on Nicolle Wallace’s show.” This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
thetragichippy Posted 40 minutes ago Author Report Posted 40 minutes ago 4 hours ago, TheMissingBand said: no actual police experts are coming out and saying “good shoot. This is how we train our officers to respond.” Is there a such thing as a "good shoot"? There are plenty of attorneys and lawyers explaining why this was a justified shoot. OlDawg 1 Quote
TheMissingBand Posted 18 minutes ago Report Posted 18 minutes ago 11 minutes ago, thetragichippy said: Is there a such thing as a "good shoot"? There are plenty of attorneys and lawyers explaining why this was a justified shoot. Absolutely. One that was by the book, no room for disagreement. A traffic stop where the subject emerges from the vehicle brandishing a handgun in a threatening manner and the officer puts two in his chest. Closed book, problem solved. My guess is that most instructors for LEOs cringe at what they’re seeing. My guess is also that most supervisors pray that their officers never behave so stupidly. Quote
baddog Posted 15 minutes ago Report Posted 15 minutes ago Just now, TheMissingBand said: Absolutely. One that was by the book, no room for disagreement. A traffic stop where the subject emerges from the vehicle brandishing a handgun in a threatening manner and the officer puts two in his chest. Closed book, problem solved. My guess is that most instructors for LEOs cringe at what they’re seeing. My guess is also that most supervisors pray that their officers never behave so stupidly. You’re not aware of the liberal twist? The stupidity always falls on law enforcement. For some reason, they hate laws and enforcement. Can’t believe people actually think like that. Quote
Reagan Posted 14 minutes ago Report Posted 14 minutes ago This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: “It's clear that Walz, Frey, and Flanagan want this insurrection to continue because it takes the focus off the massive fraud that's been occurring in that state, much of it with Walz's knowledge.” This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.