OlDawg Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago The way to put an end to much of this immigration foolishness is for someone living in a sanctuary city/State to go to court over a specific policy that infringed on their rights under Federal Law. If they could prove personal harm that was Constitutionally protected, and get it to SCOTUS, we might make some progress. So far, most of the cases have been between Feds and States, and many have been dismissed. An actual individual party with a case would almost force SCOTUS to take up the issue, and make some kind of ruling one way or the other. Quote
Reagan Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, tvc184 said: Is it a crime to pay a person to protest? Not if they peacefully protest. But which party is responsible if laws are broken? What are they being taught at these protest “teaching” sessions? The payers do need to be exposed! Quote
tvc184 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, thetragichippy said: What if you can prove they are being paid to protest and trained/encouraged to break the law by impeding/blocking police vehicles, etc? They might be able to stretch it into some kind of conspiracy but they crime would not be the pay but the plan to commit (at least in Texas) a felony. Merely planning a crime is not in itself a crime. It would have to be proven that 3 or more people got together and planned on committing a felony and at least one person in the conspiracy did an overt act to further the felony. At least under Texas law, saying that I’ll give you $50 if you go stand on the corner with a sign saying whatever I want like the police are there gestapo, is in itself not a crime that I know of. Quote
tvc184 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Reagan said: Not if they peacefully protest. But which party is responsible if laws are broken? What are they being taught at these protest “teaching” sessions? The payers do need to be exposed! You can expose the payers if you want. What’s the crime though? OMG, it’s the George Soros group! We can prove it! Charge them with…. uhhh….. charge them with…. Let me get back to you. Quote
Reagan Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, tvc184 said: You can expose the payers if you want. What’s the crime though? OMG, it’s the George Soros group! We can prove it! Charge them with…. uhhh….. charge them with…. Let me get back to you. You don’t there’s guilt there “if” they teach to break laws. Heck, they got Trump on RICO charges. Is there culpability here in this area? 🤷♂️ Quote
Reagan Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 19 minutes ago, tvc184 said: You can expose the payers if you want. What’s the crime though? OMG, it’s the George Soros group! We can prove it! Charge them with…. uhhh….. charge them with…. Let me get back to you. Who Funds the Groups Harassing ICE Agents in Minnesota? The Left's Premier Foundations and Dark Money Networks Have Given Millions, Records Show. From the article: "At the center of the unrest is the Sunrise Movement, a left-wing group founded to fight climate change that has since directed its local chapters to fight the Trump administration. Sunrise is bankrolled by a who's who of deep-pocketed left-wing organizations. Open Society Foundations has sent it $2 million since 2019, according to its grant database. Half of the money supported general "social welfare activities." The Ford Foundation contributed $150,000 in 2024 and $550,000 in 2025, while the MacArthur Foundation—the 12th-largest private charity in America—gave $250,000 in 2024, according to tax filings and grant disclosures. Sunrise says it generally rejects "checks that come with expectations of input on our strategy." It also says donations go to support its local chapters with "materials, housing, technology, food, travel, training expenses, and more." Sunrise Twin Cities has collaborated with two other local groups to drive anti-ICE demonstrations: Unidos MN and Defend the 612." This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
bullets13 Posted 26 minutes ago Report Posted 26 minutes ago Pretty amazing to me that there is clear video of the officer being hit by the car, clear precedent and case law showing why the officer was justified in the shooting, commentary from almost every legal expert in the country saying he was justified, etc... And yet somehow half the country (including politicians and law enforcement higher ups) is still screaming that this is murder. Reagan 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.