Jump to content

Coldspring-Oakhurst (22) @ Splendora (14) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

Game Info:


Start: Friday, September 1, 2023 at 7:30:00 PM
Home Team Name/Class/District/Division: Splendora - 4A-10-1
Record: District Wins: 0, Overall Wins: 0, District Losses: 0, Overall Losses: 1

Visiting Team Name/Class/District/Division: Coldspring-Oakhurst- 3A-9-1
Record: District Wins: 0, Overall Wins: 0, District Losses: 0, Overall Losses: 1

District Matchup: No

*Standings do not include this game.

 

INSTRUCTIONS TO LIVE UPDATE THIS GAME ON THE SCOREBOARD: 
Type !!score: or !!: as your "command" then Visitor's Score/Home Score/Quarter

Example: !!score:10/14/4 would be 10 to 14 in the 4th quarter
!!:21/28/2 would be 21 to 28 in the 2nd quarter

Use h or H for halftime, and f or F for final
You may also use - , or | in place of /

Extras: Post the time left in the quarter as minutes/seconds.
Ex:7/0/1/13/25 = 7 to 0, 1st quarter, 13 minutes, 25 seconds left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TrojanWarrior08 said:

I will try something new for myself... Starting this week I will compile our district results after each Friday or Saturday and post about each team bias to my own opinions.  Stay tuned because I may post up this week tonight.

Thanks that is good bc i was just trying to see how the pre-district games in our district were

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jds82 said:

Honest question…can we truly put much stock in these pre district games? It’s a whole different game when district starts..just my humble opinion 

There's a lot of truth into this but also realize this that some teams in the same district that may play common pre-district opponents and it's something that you can go by own.  However with that being said sometimes teams play each other differently to their strengths and weaknesses for example next weeks game when we play H-F.  Now East Chambers isn't in our district but they're in our bi-district and we can possibly play them in the playoffs providing that both teams make it.  Now take both Coldspring and East Chambers schedule the common opponent is Hamshire-Fannett and EC has played them a different way then what we will play them (we run the Slot-T don't know what EC runs) but it's the same opponent so I can't speak for nobody else but I take stock when it comes to pre-season opponents common or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jds82 said:

Honest question…can we truly put much stock in these pre district games? It’s a whole different game when district starts..just my humble opinion 

Yes we can because for Coldspring, it lets us know which team will be the toughest to beat in my opinion. In my opinion based on the 2 games Woodville has played they have set the bar high. Almost upsetting #1 Franklin & then giving perennial power Newton all it can handle, definitely lets us know Woodville will be the team to beat. I feel like Woodville put all of class 3a on alert with the near upset of defending state champions Franklin. Again no worries just my opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TrojanWarrior08 said:

There's a lot of truth into this but also realize this that some teams in the same district that may play common pre-district opponents and it's something that you can go by own.  However with that being said sometimes teams play each other differently to their strengths and weaknesses for example next weeks game when we play H-F.  Now East Chambers isn't in our district but they're in our bi-district and we can possibly play them in the playoffs providing that both teams make it.  Now take both Coldspring and East Chambers schedule the common opponent is Hamshire-Fannett and EC has played them a different way then what we will play them (we run the Slot-T don't know what EC runs) but it's the same opponent so I can't speak for nobody else but I take stock when it comes to pre-season opponents common or not.

That’s true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...