Jump to content

Corrupt Ken Paxton Impeached by GOP-Controlled Texas House


DonTheCon2024

Recommended Posts

You know it’s bad when your own team turns on you!

Let me guess.. all the Texas republicans who voted to impeach this corrupt, under investigation for a decade scumbag are all RINOs and closet liberals 

121-23, not even close. 

 

The 121-23 vote constitutes an abrupt downfall for one of the GOP’s most prominent legal combatants, who in 2020 asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn President Joe Biden’s electoral 

This is the hidden content, please
. It makes Paxton only the third sitting official in Texas’ nearly 200-year history to have been impeached.

 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bullets13 said:

I personally think it’s a good thing that they’re not closing ranks around him.  If he’s crooked get him out of there.  

Yes.

DTC thinks Paxton is a crook and should be removed and when the Republicans did just that in an overwhelming vote, apparently DTC has an issue with it.

You would think the thread title would be, Republicans Do The Right Thing.

 But not so with DTC…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Another bandwagon for you jump on?  But,  it’s fine with you for the biden crime family syndicate to go unpunished?  If he’s guilty, he deserves it.  

Damn, just couldn’t help yourself with the whataboutism reply right off the bat lol
 

I agree on Biden. How many more times you want to agree on this? 

 

2 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Yes.

DTC thinks Paxton is a crook and should be removed and when the Republicans did just that in an overwhelming vote, apparently DTC has an issue with it.

You would think the thread title would be, Republicans Do The Right Thing.

 But not so with DTC…..


brother - why on earth would I have an issue with house voting to impeach him? Your reply doesn’t make sense.
 

You’re making arguments up in your head lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DonTheCon2024 said:

Damn, just couldn’t help yourself with the whataboutism reply right off the bat lol
 

I agree on Biden. How many more times you want to agree on this? 

 


brother - why on earth would I have an issue with house voting to impeach him? Your reply doesn’t make sense.
 

You’re making arguments up in your head lol

His reply made perfect sense, you just didn’t get the reply you were wanting.

Just another typical dumb trolling post from the enlightened one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Unwoke said:

If he’s guilty of a crime by all means he needs to be prosecuted but I think there may be more this situation than what’s in the main stream media . Time will tell. Politics is a dirty business. 

What crime has he supposedly committed?  If I remember right, he was overwhelmingly re-elected last election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

His reply made perfect sense, you just didn’t get the reply you were wanting.

Just another typical dumb trolling post from the enlightened one.


Another typical stupid reply from you

 

Why the hell would I have an issue with Paxton getting impeached? 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2023 at 3:52 PM, tvc184 said:

Yes.

DTC thinks Paxton is a crook and should be removed and when the Republicans did just that in an overwhelming vote, apparently DTC has an issue with it.

You would think the thread title would be, Republicans Do The Right Thing.

 But not so with DTC…..

Uh, maybe because republicans doing the right thing is an aberration?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

Uh, maybe because republicans doing the right thing is an aberration?


Lol These guys are arguing just to argue.. Doesn’t matter what I say or support (personal freedoms, lower taxes), they’ll find an issue with it or make up arguments in what’s left of their brains 

The next reply to this is probably “BUT WHAT ABOUT” 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DonTheCon2024 said:

Yeah let’s make a bazillion topics on how much Biden and democrats suck lol 

Cream of the crop with this crowd 

Nah I don’t think we need to because you ve stated how Biden sucks

but oh UTalum is a different story.

he called out the whole party with that comment

do you know what aberration means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...