Jump to content

We Cannot Have a Supreme Court Justice Who Thinks Constitution Is Racist!!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

LumRaiderFan
LumRaiderFan

You ever considered it’s based on their policies and not the color of their skin? If you’re looking for approval based on skin color, stick with the democrats, it’s their specialty.

Unwoke
Unwoke
BS Wildcats
BS Wildcats

The one that nearly bankrupted Massachusetts?

Reagan

Reagan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
28 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

First black woman, to hell with everything else.  And by the way, this is as racist and sexist a thing that I can remember a potus doing.  At least one other potus would have been crucified for doing this!

It's never wrong to do the right thing!  Anyone can check what has been stated here.  Only records have been talked about.  The only side that has brought up race and gender has been the Democrats.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just remembered the treatment of Clearance Thomas during his confirmation.  Later on, in his words -- he described it as a "High Tech Lynching!"   Guess who the chairman of the confirmation committee that led that high tech lynching and voted AGAINST this black man?!   Joe Biden!!  Joebama has also voted in the past AGAINST 4 black women to judgeships!!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

From the article:  "The Senate hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court nomination are not going well.

Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick Durbin is blocking the release of documents showing Brown Jackson's actual record as a judge. That's how Democrats do hearings these days."

Again -- why?!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, Reagan said:

Just heard a Democratic Senator brought race into the nominee discussion.  Stated that what we are seeing here, this black lady,  is starting to look like America.  Again, that's not what this is about!

If America means 6% of the population. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted

Fortunately the Supreme Court doesn’t issue statutory law. They can only rule on the constitutionality of signed law.

What she will have in most situations is a strong ally in Sotomayor. Sotomayor is the epitome of the definition of an activist judge.

Looking at decisions like Kansas v. Glover in 2019 shows Sotomayor following feelings and not the law or Constitution.  Sotomayor in that  case was the losing side of an 8-1 decision.  The 8-1 dissent isn’t a big deal but you have to read the justification for the vote. When Kagan, Ginsberg and Bryer side with the “conservative” justices in what to me should seem like a logical conclusion, it really shows your prejudice to try to rationalize the opposite.

Sotomayor will probably soon gain a strong ally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Things taken from today:

Strike Number 1:  She can't define woman!

This is the hidden content, please

Strike Number 2:  She does not know when life begins!

This is the hidden content, please

Strike Number 3:  Thinks "illegal aliens" are simply "non-citizens!"

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unwoke

Unwoke

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Reagan said:

Things taken from today:

Strike Number 1:  She can't define woman!

This is the hidden content, please

Strike Number 2:  She does not know when life begins!

This is the hidden content, please

Strike Number 3:  Thinks "illegal aliens" are simply "non-citizens!"

This is the hidden content, please

Sounds like a WingNut Activist to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Reagan said:

Things taken from today:

Strike Number 1:  She can't define woman!

This is the hidden content, please

Strike Number 2:  She does not know when life begins!

This is the hidden content, please

Strike Number 3:  Thinks "illegal aliens" are simply "non-citizens!"

This is the hidden content, please

🤦‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,986
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    SVD Beaumont
    Newest Member
    SVD Beaumont
    Joined


  • Posts

    • mat
      Hunter Biden….

      By mat · Posted

      I agree with both of you. However I think they are focusing on the gun trial to keep our focus off the laptop and international dealings.
    • SmashMouth
      Sorry for your losses

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      You've made sense at least twice in one day. Perhaps you should lie down... 😇
    • SmashMouth
      Hunter Biden….

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      While we don't always agree on political issues, I couldn't agree more. Both trials were just a circus to keep the division alive and the circus in business. Nothing of any substance got resolved today. Media & Politics. The longer they divide us, the more they benefit.
    • CardinalBacker
      Hunter Biden….

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      Meh..... this is a mess.  As I've often pointed out, I felt that the prosecutions of Trump in NYC (hush money and business valuation fraud) were a big stretch, unwarranted, and likely an abuse of power.   And I kinda feel like Hunter Biden got screwed here, too.   He's basically in trouble for lying on an application to buy a firearm... he denied that he was actively using drugs when he made the purchase.  He owned the firearm for 11 days, committed no crimes with it, then it was disposed of by a third party.  The only reason he was investigated and prosecuted is because he's Biden's son.    Anybody gloating today is no different than the people who were gloating over Trump's 34 convictions a couple of weeks ago.  We ARE a banana republic at this point.  This division won't stand for long.  We can't keep going down this road of "well, they did that to my guy, so we're going to do this to their guy" way of thinking.  God bless the America... she needs it.  
    • mat
      Hunter Biden….

      By mat · Posted

      They are getting this trial over with and any other trials that face him in the future so Joe can pardon him before he leaves.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...