Reagan Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 Just heard that when one wants to buy a gun, the Dems wants to have all members of that family psychologically tested before said gun can be bought. Thoughts?! Quote
baddog Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 On 2/9/2021 at 7:41 PM, Reagan said: Just heard that when one wants to buy a gun, the Dems wants to have all members of that family psychologically tested before said gun can be bought. Thoughts?! Expand I can’t type my thoughts without getting banned. Has Biden been psychologically tested? I would venture a guess and say NO! Quote
CardinalBacker Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 On 2/9/2021 at 7:41 PM, Reagan said: Just heard that when one wants to buy a gun, the Dems wants to have all members of that family psychologically tested before said gun can be bought. Thoughts?! Expand Not just that, but they definitely want to talk to your ex-wife. "To acquire a license, gun owners would have be 21 years old, pass a background check, complete a training course, obtain insurance, and undergo a psychological evaluation. "Military-style" weapons would require an additional training course and license. The proposed psychological evaluation would have to be conducted by a licensed psychologist and require them to interview the spouse, former spouses, and least two other family members or associates of the person applying. Licenses would be automatically denied if the applicant had ever been hospitalized with a "mental illness, disturbance, or diagnosis," including depression, suicidal ideation, or addiction." This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
baddog Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 On 2/9/2021 at 7:57 PM, CardinalBacker said: Not just that, but they definitely want to talk to your ex-wife. "To acquire a license, gun owners would have be 21 years old, pass a background check, complete a training course, obtain insurance, and undergo a psychological evaluation. "Military-style" weapons would require an additional training course and license. The proposed psychological evaluation would have to be conducted by a licensed psychologist and require them to interview the spouse, former spouses, and least two other family members or associates of the person applying. Licenses would be automatically denied if the applicant had ever been hospitalized with a "mental illness, disturbance, or diagnosis," including depression, suicidal ideation, or addiction." This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Expand That won’t ever happen in Texas; at least not while I am alive. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 On 2/9/2021 at 8:03 PM, baddog said: That won’t ever happen in Texas; at least not while I am alive. Expand If i'm not mistaken, it's a part of the federal firearms act that filed by Sheila Jackson Lee. That would make it a federal issue. Quote
baddog Posted February 9, 2021 Report Posted February 9, 2021 On 2/9/2021 at 8:57 PM, CardinalBacker said: If i'm not mistaken, it's a part of the federal firearms act that filed by Sheila Jackson Lee. That would make it a federal issue. Expand That dog won’t hunt in Texas. Forget Jackson. Another racist communist. Quote
UT alum Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 On 2/9/2021 at 7:41 PM, Reagan said: Just heard that when one wants to buy a gun, the Dems wants to have all members of that family psychologically tested before said gun can be bought. Thoughts?! Expand Where’d you hear that? The same place that “many people have said”? Or maybe, “many people have heard”? Or maybe the place where “many people have heard that many people have said”? Just tryin’ too keep my facts straight. Quote
Chester86 Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 On 2/10/2021 at 3:00 PM, UT alum said: Where’d you hear that? The same place that “many people have said”? Or maybe, “many people have heard”? Or maybe the place where “many people have heard that many people have said”? Just tryin’ too keep my facts straight. Expand Don't read the news much, do you? You're probably one of those that doesn't REALLY think the democrats want to take our guns...smh. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 On 2/10/2021 at 3:00 PM, UT alum said: Where’d you hear that? The same place that “many people have said”? Or maybe, “many people have heard”? Or maybe the place where “many people have heard that many people have said”? Just tryin’ too keep my facts straight. Expand This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up “(D) as part of the psychological evaluation, the licensed psychologist interviewed any spouse of the individual, any former spouse of the individual, and at least 2 other persons who are a member of the family of, or an associate of, the individual to further determine the state of the mental, emotional, and relational stability of the individual in relation to firearms. That's pulled directly from the text of the bill, pal. LumRaiderFan 1 Quote
Reagan Posted February 10, 2021 Author Report Posted February 10, 2021 On 2/10/2021 at 3:00 PM, UT alum said: Where’d you hear that? The same place that “many people have said”? Or maybe, “many people have heard”? Or maybe the place where “many people have heard that many people have said”? Just tryin’ too keep my facts straight. Expand Rush Limbaugh show that was hosted by Todd Herman! Quote
Reagan Posted February 10, 2021 Author Report Posted February 10, 2021 I know there are some here that feels like the Constitution is a deterrence to their socialist utopia. But, what were are discussing here has to at the least violate the 4th Amendment to the Constitution! Quote
CardinalBacker Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 On 2/10/2021 at 4:01 PM, Reagan said: I know there are some here that feels like the Constitution is a deterrence to their socialist utopia. But, what were are discussing here has to at the least violate the 4th Amendment to the Constitution! Expand More importantly the 2nd. Quote
SmashMouth Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 I’ll just keep buying them under the table. Quote
Reagan Posted February 10, 2021 Author Report Posted February 10, 2021 On 2/10/2021 at 4:08 PM, CardinalBacker said: More importantly the 2nd. Expand 100% true. But expanding to family members has to violate the 4th. Quote
SmashMouth Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 It won’t even pass the house, I don’t think. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 On 2/10/2021 at 4:21 PM, SmashMouth said: It won’t even pass the house, I don’t think. Expand I'm not so sure... The Ds tend to do a better job of falling in line than the Rs. Quote
baddog Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 On 2/10/2021 at 3:56 PM, CardinalBacker said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up “(D) as part of the psychological evaluation, the licensed psychologist interviewed any spouse of the individual, any former spouse of the individual, and at least 2 other persons who are a member of the family of, or an associate of, the individual to further determine the state of the mental, emotional, and relational stability of the individual in relation to firearms. That's pulled directly from the text of the bill, pal. Expand Well, looks like ex-husbands won’t be able to buy or own a gun. You know those ex-wives will nail them. CardinalBacker and Reagan 2 Quote
5GallonBucket Posted February 10, 2021 Report Posted February 10, 2021 I don’t put anything pass dems. i mean they can’t even see a problem with boys playing dress up to play against girls. A bunch of screwed up individuals. PERIOD Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.