Jump to content

Supreme Court Paxon Lawsuit


Big girl

Recommended Posts

They refuse to hear the case with 18 states backing Texas , that doesn’t mean there wasn’t evidence of fraud. Some of the cowardly justices probably didn’t want their families threatened and canceled like the Democrat Left has done when you don’t agree with them. What a thieving embarrassing election this is becoming. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Big girl said:

This is the hidden content, please

I trust these conservative justices.  We know there was massive fraud.  They were not going to debate this aspect of it anyway.  Apparently they are saying this is not the way that this needs to be resolved.  I think everybody knew it was a long shot.   Again --  the fraud is still there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Reagan said:

I trust these conservative justices.  We know there was massive fraud.  They were not going to debate this aspect of it anyway.  Apparently they are saying this is not the way that this needs to be resolved.  I think everybody knew it was a long shot.   Again --  the fraud is still there!

Texas’s case wasn’t about fraud but the fact the swing states did not follow their own voting laws put forth in the US Constitution which allowed the fraud which in turn diluted Texas’s electoral votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Realville said:

Texas’s case wasn’t about fraud but the fact the swing states did not follow their own voting laws put forth in the US Constitution which allowed the fraud which in turn diluted Texas’s electoral votes.

Realville, my friend, don't fret.  The Justices didn't decide on ANY of the 4 state's illegal activities.  Nothing concerning the fraud or the obvious Constitutional violations.  What they said was:  Texas does not have the standing/authority to be concerned about what another state do with their elections.  That's it!  There is no doubt in my mind that law suits that are out there concerning the fraud that we are concerned about will end up before the Supreme Court.  And I'm sure the Justices realize this.  And I feel strongly that when presented with all the fraud evidence that they will rule in Trump's favor.  

As for as the Constitutional violations of the 4 states, once all this has been settled, the GOP within these states are going to have to file the law suits that could eventually be brought before the Supreme Court.  Keep the faith.  The devils will not prevail!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Realville said:

They refuse to hear the case with 18 states backing Texas , that doesn’t mean there wasn’t evidence of fraud. Some of the cowardly justices probably didn’t want their families threatened and canceled like the Democrat Left has done when you don’t agree with them. What a thieving embarrassing election this is becoming. 

It's over. The fat lady sang. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump was right.

Democrats used the pandemic for their mail-in voting scam. Anyone who can't see this is blinded by their ideology, or an utter fool.
 

Try watching some the eyewitness testimony of people under oath at the hearings in front of the swing state State Legislatures that the National Media covered up. The outright fraud and bullying was ridiculous. Wether your Democrat or Republican it would  piss you off after hearing the eyewitness testimonies at these hearings unless your feelings are always hurt by Trump. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

December 13. 2a20 - 1 0:46 AM EST 

Chris Christie calls Trump's 
legal team's legal theory an 
'absurdity ' 

The RINO must not be paying attention.  BTW -- I heard a little while ago that Sydney Powell said that the Supreme Court has her lawsuits of fraud by these 4 states.  Getting interesting.   Dove -- I know it looks like you got what you wanted.  But if this election was compromised with fraud -- does this, would this, bother you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,987
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    SVD Beaumont
    Newest Member
    SVD Beaumont
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I didn't like the hire from the beginning, but you are correct. 100% the supt. choice.
    • Let’s all pray that this upcoming season will be a great one and that all players will stay as healthy as possible. We all know (or should) that we’re talking about kids so no matter what team that you support, to ensure that we’re being as encouraging and uplifting as we can be as grown (oftentimes immature) adults.    Staying true to the subject topic, it should be a competitive game against Woodville & Fig Newton. I’d venture to say that the winner of this game will most definitely be crowned the district champs. 
    • I get that. And most will say that givin the d1 athletes…..myself included, but 4trips in a row….come on now  I know that they probably don’t win that 2nd sc without them and probably not make it as far the last two years. (Those that are in the know…know) They re able to connect to players and manage those d1 egos and know who should play where and when giving certain situations in game. tremaine just turned around a bottom dweller team in the Corpus Christi area to a playoff contender in one year. yes having athletes make it a lil easier but when you repeat to state 4 years in a row coaching is a huge part of that.  Your last comment is ridiculous….there is more to coaching than just throwing athletes in defensive and offensive sets. United has more coming thru the pipeline…..let’s see how Green manages/coaches it.  
    • If that’s not enough, you’re lost.
    • I am wary of the independent and undecided voters. I'm afraid the felony convictions (as spurious as they are) will have a negative affect on Trump, no matter what the polls show right now.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...