Jump to content

FISA reports about to be released

BS Wildcats

By BS Wildcats
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
  On 11/24/2019 at 1:27 PM, UT alum said:

A fool, you say? Is that really necessary? If it is necessary, then I understand better why you blindly accept Trump’s infallibility.

Expand  

So now being called foolish is offensive? Put your big boy pants on and don’t be thin skinned. You have been duped by your own party into believing that Trump is evil and not good for Americans. Actually, Trump is not good for the deep state and demoncrats in general. He makes them angry and the followers are crybabies. How can anyone follow people who make stuff up? How much has already been disproven? Hiw much has to be disproven until you can see the light of day? 

BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 11/24/2019 at 8:14 PM, baddog said:

So now being called foolish is offensive? Put your big boy pants on and don’t be thin skinned. You have been duped by your own party into believing that Trump is evil and not good for Americans. Actually, Trump is not good for the deep state and demoncrats in general. He makes them angry and the followers are crybabies. How can anyone follow people who make stuff up? How much has already been disproven? Hiw much has to be disproven until you can see the light of day? 

Expand  

They are blinded by TDS.

UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
  On 11/24/2019 at 8:14 PM, baddog said:

So now being called foolish is offensive? Put your big boy pants on and don’t be thin skinned. You have been duped by your own party into believing that Trump is evil and not good for Americans. Actually, Trump is not good for the deep state and demoncrats in general. He makes them angry and the followers are crybabies. How can anyone follow people who make stuff up? How much has already been disproven? Hiw much has to be disproven until you can see the light of day? 

Expand  

Sounds like it’s necessary.

BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 11/25/2019 at 2:47 PM, UT alum said:

I stopped calling people I disagree with names when I first put my big boy pants on long ago. That make sense?

Expand  

I'll bet to differ with you on that one. I remember you calling someone a dumbass in another thread just a couple of weeks ago.  How long ago did those big boy pants get put on?

UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
  On 11/25/2019 at 3:02 PM, BS Wildcats said:

I'll bet to differ with you on that one. I remember you calling someone a dumbass in another thread just a couple of weeks ago.  How long ago did those big boy pants get put on?

Expand  

There are exceptions to rules. I was reacting to another post referring to Schiff as a dumbass citing something the poster obviously misconstrued. I know subtlety is not a Trumper’s strong suit, so I understand your taking all name calling as insulting name calling. You weren’t trying to make a point when you called me a fool. You  just used an insult to make yourself look smarter. Big difference there.

UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
  On 11/25/2019 at 3:02 PM, BS Wildcats said:

I'll bet to differ with you on that one. I remember you calling someone a dumbass in another thread just a couple of weeks ago.  How long ago did those big boy pants get put on?

Expand  

Or maybe I should use Trump’s defense and you’ll accept that. “I didn’t say it, and if I did, that’s not what I meant, and even so, you in the echo chamber will never give me the credit I deserve no matter what.”

that work?

BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 11/25/2019 at 3:33 PM, UT alum said:

Or maybe I should use Trump’s defense and you’ll accept that. “I didn’t say it, and if I did, that’s not what I meant, and even so, you in the echo chamber will never give me the credit I deserve no matter what.”

that work?

Expand  

The point is you said it, but claimed you don't name call.  Just refreshing your memory for you.  

BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 11/25/2019 at 3:29 PM, UT alum said:

There are exceptions to rules. I was reacting to another post referring to Schiff as a dumbass citing something the poster obviously misconstrued. I know subtlety is not a Trumper’s strong suit, so I understand your taking all name calling as insulting name calling. You weren’t trying to make a point when you called me a fool. You  just used an insult to make yourself look smarter. Big difference there.

Expand  

You are like Shifty Schiff and the Dims in the House.  I didn't call you a fool, so you can't get a story straight either.  

baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted

One who is foolish is a fool. One who can be duped is a fool. Better to be thought a fool than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt. I don’t consider it name calling, but the “offended” route is the one taken by dims. I feel so bad.

 

baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
  On 11/25/2019 at 3:29 PM, UT alum said:

There are exceptions to rules. I was reacting to another post referring to Schiff as a dumbass citing something the poster obviously misconstrued. I know subtlety is not a Trumper’s strong suit, so I understand your taking all name calling as insulting name calling. You weren’t trying to make a point when you called me a fool. You  just used an insult to make yourself look smarter. Big difference there.

Expand  

There is no difference. Only a dim could claim that. Lmao

UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
  On 11/25/2019 at 3:52 PM, baddog said:

One who is foolish is a fool. One who can be duped is a fool. Better to be thought a fool than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt. I don’t consider it name calling, but the “offended” route is the one taken by dims. I feel so bad.

 

Expand  

And thus, the argument for civil discourse is refuted.

LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
  On 11/26/2019 at 1:49 PM, UT alum said:

He’s using the same tactic as climate change deniers. Around 92 or so percent of black people think he’s a racist, but you’ll believe the tiny minority of opinion if it makes your guy ( or issue) look good. I got to give it to him, though. He’s a prime grade toady

Expand  

 

  On 11/26/2019 at 1:28 PM, UT alum said:

He may not have, but he kicked Moscow Mitch’s ass in getting his signature piece of legislation passed after that relic swore his number one goal as majority leader was to make Obama a one term president. Trump can’t even level an effective insult at Pelosi, let alone work the house to get any of his legislation passed.  He’s not effective. He’s defective. 

Expand  

 

  On 11/25/2019 at 2:47 PM, UT alum said:

I stopped calling people I disagree with names when I first put my big boy pants on long ago. That make sense?

Expand  

 

Not really.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,278
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ted Lasso
    Newest Member
    Ted Lasso
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...