Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Great idea.  You know, some of these MMGW folks are geniuses.  You have to wonder why no one thought of this before.  😂😂😂🤮🤮🤮

Posted
  On 8/11/2019 at 4:31 PM, Hagar said:

Great idea.  You know, some of these MMGW folks are geniuses.  You have to wonder why no one thought of this before.  😂😂😂🤮🤮🤮

Expand  

Depending on what I eat and how much coffee I drink, I can go to twice in one day. Guess that would put me on the extermination list.

Posted
  On 8/11/2019 at 6:40 PM, baddog said:

Depending on what I eat and how much coffee I drink, I can go to twice in one day. Guess that would put me on the extermination list.

Expand  

In Brazil, you’d get the death penalty. 

But on a serious note, if they made this a law in California, it’d cut the pooping in the streets in half.  😂😂😂😂

Posted
  On 8/12/2019 at 12:47 AM, Hagar said:

In Brazil, you’d get the death penalty. 

But on a serious note, if they made this a law in California, it’d cut the pooping in the streets in half.  😂😂😂😂

Expand  

Probably not because illegals and homeless would be exempt and somehow it would be a racist policy

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

At least they are saving the environment I guess....

 

 

FREMONT (CBS SF) – A Tesla electric patrol car by the Fremont Police ran low on electricity in the middle of a pursuit, after the department said someone forgot to plug the vehicle into a charger.

According to officials, the officer was pursuing a vehicle headed down to the South Bay when the car began to run low on battery power.

This is the hidden content, please

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Biggest scam going 

 

Quote:
Catherine McKenna's Climate Change Ministry is ignoring a century's worth of weather data that doesn't fit with the Liberals' pro-carbon tax, fear-mongering agenda, according to a new exclusive report by Blacklock's Reporter.

According to Blacklock's,

"Environment Canada omitted 100 years' worth of weather data from a federal website intended to illustrate climate change. Staff also used "modeling" instead of actual temperature readings to plot dramatic graphs, but said the result was 
This is the hidden content, please
.


"The historical data is not observed historical data," said Samantha Bayard, spokesperson for the department. "It is modeled historic data."

The temperature data is part of a new website by Climate Change Canada meant for policymakers to "support and enable Canada's climate change adaptation planning, and improve access to relevant climate data." It's meant to be the 
This is the hidden content, please
 are built on.

However, government cataloged temperature measurements collected between 1850-1949 were replaced by 24 models and historical simulations based on data collected from 1950-2005. The ministry claims the readings were excluded because the number of weather stations nationwide wasn't "dense" enough.

However, I think the truth is something much different. The 1850-1949 historical temperature readings are a bit of an inconvenient truth for the Liberals pro-carbon tax agenda.

Blacklock's reports that Vancouver was hotter in 1910 than it was in 2017. Toronto was warmer in 1852 than it was in 2017 and Moncton was warmer in 1906 than in 2017.

This is the hidden content, please

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    ben broussard
    Newest Member
    ben broussard
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...