Jump to content

Hardin Tournament


aTmfan06

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

 

Hardin 9
Tarkington 5 
F

Hardin wins the Tournament and is 4-0

Hardin is a very salty team, got a few boys that swing it well. As I think everyone knows that don't have pitching depth, the pitching rule are coming into play big time in the tournaments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, idk said:

Hardin is a very salty team, got a few boys that swing it well. As I think everyone knows that don't have pitching depth, the pitching rule are coming into play big time in the tournaments.

I don't think so. IMO, any coach that throws a kid over 110 pitches in one tournament should not have a job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

I don't think so. IMO, any coach that throws a kid over 110 pitches in one tournament should not have a job.

that is not what I was saying. I agree that a coach should not throw a kid that much, I wouldn't even want my son to throw 110 this early in the season. But for some teams if is coming into play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, idk said:

that is not what I was saying. I agree that a coach should not throw a kid that much, I wouldn't even want my son to throw 110 this early in the season. But for some teams if is coming into play.

Agree. Especially at the smaller schools that only have one or two guys who can really pitch. Were seeing a lot of "throwers" in these tournaments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tigers2010 said:

Agree. Especially at the smaller schools that only have one or two guys who can really pitch. Were seeing a lot of "throwers" in these tournaments.

I agree, For the teams that have a deep pitching staff, well they should be in the thick of things anyway, but for the teams that don't have much pitching. The games are very boring and hard to watch. We are seeing a lot of throwers also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
    • 21-6A Humble Kingwood- 3 Pasadena Memorial-2   17-5A Barbers Hill- 2 Angleton- 1
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...