Jump to content

2017 recruiting.


king

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said:

Did anyone else see where the HammBone CB'd Kendall Sheffield to the good guys today?  What would ever possess him to do such a thing, especially considering everyone else has him CB'd to aggy??

This is the hidden content, please

 

He's trying to jinx UT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/17/2016 at 7:33 AM, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said:

Dude, take an Aaron Rodgers pill and R-E-L-A-X. Relax!  It's gonna be ok. Herman now just has to fill this class out,  then worry about winning games in 2017. You will see a totally different recruiting method next year if he does. And aggy tears...

This.  It is inevitable.  Not even worth an I told you so.  All but the most delusional of aggys are taking a cue from their distinguished alumni Clayton Williams...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, D3zii said:

Marvin Wilson realeases Top 5 of

LSU,OhioSt, OU, FSU, an a surprise of USF (Strong) lol

Texas didn't make the cut, but nothing new 

Hate missing out on him.  As you can guess from the final 5, we were a virtual lock to land him with Charlie.  And as I stated early this fall, another school in Texas has zero chance to land him.  I'm rooting for him; he's a great kid.  Unless he goes to OU of course.  

Coach O is likely to land him.  And even with that stellar defense he already has, Marvin will be an immediate game changer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, king said:

This is the hidden content, please

I bet that ratio is inline with the percentage of 4/5* ratings that are awarded. There are tons more 2/3* recruits out there than 4/5*. The real question is what is the percentage of 4/5* make it to the nfl as opposed to lower rankings.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said:

I bet that ratio is inline with the percentage of 4/5* ratings that are awarded. There are tons more 2/3* recruits out there than 4/5*. The real question is what is the percentage of 4/5* make it to the nfl as opposed to lower rankings.

 

5 stars are only the top 50 athletes. So your percentages are skewed to start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said:

I bet that ratio is inline with the percentage of 4/5* ratings that are awarded. There are tons more 2/3* recruits out there than 4/5*. The real question is what is the percentage of 4/5* make it to the nfl as opposed to lower rankings.

 

There are usually about 30 -5* players and 300 - 4* out of the roughly 2500 FBS Players signed each year which is around 13%.  

 

This is the hidden content, please
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said:

That's right. So the real question is what percentage of those 30 5* guys end up making nfl rosters compared to lower star ratings. Is there a correlation there or are the numbers still skewed? 

About half of the 30 or so 5 star players get drafted each year.

 

These are some numbers for 1st rounders.  Everyone should just do like Bama and take all of the 5 stars they can get.  Half of them will pan out.  

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

About half of the 30 or so 5 star players get drafted each year.

 

These are some numbers for 1st rounders.  Everyone should just do like Bama and take all of the 5 stars they can get.  Half of them will pan out.  

This is the hidden content, please

What school is not currently already doing this? 

.....curious 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

About half of the 30 or so 5 star players get drafted each year.

 

These are some numbers for 1st rounders.  Everyone should just do like Bama and take all of the 5 stars they can get.  Half of them will pan out.  

This is the hidden content, please

So the conclusion in that article is what I'm talking about. You have to dig deeper to get the real answer...a 5* has a much higher percentage of making the nfl than say a  2* because there are so few 5* to begin with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
    • 🤣🤣🤣  Right on schedule!!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...