Can Trump beat Clinton?

[PhatMack19]

Hillary is going after the police haters now, although I don't think if she would have had a son, he would look like any of them.  

 

 

 

[Hagar]

IMO this will probably be the initial shot fired by the liberal media once Trump is the Rep nominee.  Can't release now supposedly w/out Trumps approval, but when he's in, it'll mysteriously get leaked - whatever it is.  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Hagar]

How could Trump, or any Rep, have a chance against someone who has this much character?

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Bobcat1]

Cruz and Rubio need to work out a deal, whoever drops out they will be their VP pick.  They're splitting the votes and it's giving Trump more and more delegates.

[bullets13]

1 hour ago, Bobcat1 said:

Cruz and Rubio need to work out a deal, whoever drops out they will be their VP pick.  They're splitting the votes and it's giving Trump more and more delegates.

they could play a game of tax cut, gun, bible.  best out of three, maybe?

[stevenash]

2 hours ago, bullets13 said:

they could play a game of tax cut, gun, bible.  best out of three, maybe?

Your comment brought something to mind and even though I am not directing it specifically at you, you might be able to answer it for me.  I am terribly curious why those who claim to be the champions of compassion and tolerance are not hesitant to criticize/belittle those who closely follow the bible and believe in the second amendment?

[PAMFAM10]

Yes it might be time for Cruz and Rubio to put egos aside. A Cruz/Rubio Rubio/Cruz is the only chance to catch Donald Trump. 

[smitty]

59 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Yes it might be time for Cruz and Rubio to put egos aside. A Cruz/Rubio Rubio/Cruz is the only chance to catch Donald Trump. 

Cruz/Rubio would do the trick!

[Hagar]

I know that several of you posting on this thread are infinitely smarter than me, so I'd sincerely appreciate one or more of you answering this question for me. 

How in the cornbread hell can so many people be prepared to vote on Hillary Clinton?   She's been caught in numerous lies as Secretary of State, and has little regard for protecting secret information that could possibly jeopardize our national security.  I won't even get into Whitewater, V. Foster, etc, etc.

Please, someone explain this to me because I can't understand it. I'm not looking to argue, or try to ridicule your response, I just want a logical explanation.  Thank you in advance. 

[westend1]

8 hours ago, REBgp said:

I know that several of you posting on this thread are infinitely smarter than me, so I'd sincerely appreciate one or more of you answering this question for me. 

How in the cornbread hell can so many people be prepared to vote on Hillary Clinton?   She's been caught in numerous lies as Secretary of State, and has little regard for protecting secret information that could possibly jeopardize our national security.  I won't even get into Whitewater, V. Foster, etc, etc.

Please, someone explain this to me because I can't understand it. I'm not looking to argue, or try to ridicule your response, I just want a logical explanation.  Thank you in advance. 

Because the alternative is trump?

[PN-G bamatex]

1 hour ago, westend1 said:

Because the alternative is trump?

^ That, and as much as I hate to say it, in American politics, there are some people who are just made of Teflon.

[Hagar]

3 hours ago, westend1 said:

Because the alternative is trump?

Lol, ok I get that.  

Let me expand my statement. It wouldn't matter who her opponent is, she'd still get approx 50% of the votes.  Trump, Truman, Lincoln.  Many years ago we referred to locals that always, no matter what, voted Dem, as Yellow Dog Dems (would vote Dem if a yellow dog ran).  Don't remember there being this many, and in those days there were some (relatively) conservative Dems & some liberal Rep.  Not so many voted straight party like today. 

[westend1]

7 hours ago, REBgp said:

Lol, ok I get that.  

Let me expand my statement. It wouldn't matter who her opponent is, she'd still get approx 50% of the votes.  Trump, Truman, Lincoln.  Many years ago we referred to locals that always, no matter what, voted Dem, as Yellow Dog Dems (would vote Dem if a yellow dog ran).  Don't remember there being this many, and in those days there were some (relatively) conservative Dems & some liberal Rep.  Not so many voted straight party like today. 

Look, Hillary doesn't thrill me, but until someone provides some evidence that her email server was breached, it just doesn't resonate with me.   Same with Benghazi.  It was a security failure.   That's it, at least for me.    I think a lot of people feel that way.  Now why on Earth would somebody vote for Trump?

[Hagar]

45 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Look, Hillary doesn't thrill me, but until someone provides some evidence that her email server was breached, it just doesn't resonate with me.   Same with Benghazi.  It was a security failure.   That's it, at least for me.    I think a lot of people feel that way.  Now why on Earth would somebody vote for Trump?

I appreciate your candor of why you like Hillary.  Don't agree, but that's to be expected, me being conservative.  

As to your question why would someone vote for Trump.  While Trump is not my choice for the Rep nomination, I understand why he is for a lot of people.  He's not part of the establishment, ignores the PC Police, and talks tough towards those who intend to kill Americans.  And based on the votes he's getting, a lot of people like that.  

[baddog]

People will vote for Trump simply because he is not a communist.

[stevenash]

On ‎3‎/‎5‎/‎2016 at 6:06 PM, westend1 said:

Look, Hillary doesn't thrill me, but until someone provides some evidence that her email server was breached, it just doesn't resonate with me.   Same with Benghazi.  It was a security failure.   That's it, at least for me.    I think a lot of people feel that way.  Now why on Earth would somebody vote for Trump?

So you have no problem with her telling the parents of the 4 dead Americans ( when their bodies arrived in the U.S.) that she assured them they would "get that guy who made the video"?

[Englebert]

On ‎3‎/‎5‎/‎2016 at 6:06 PM, westend1 said:

Look, Hillary doesn't thrill me, but until someone provides some evidence that her email server was breached, it just doesn't resonate with me.   Same with Benghazi.  It was a security failure.   That's it, at least for me.    I think a lot of people feel that way.  Now why on Earth would somebody vote for Trump?

It doesn't bother you that Gen Petraeus was prosecuted for showing classified documents to his biographer, but Hillary is given a free pass for doing the same thing on a much larger scale? We all know that Hillary's lawyer had a thumb drive containing backups of Hillary's emails. Did he steal these thousands of "now classified" emails, or did Hillary provide them to him?

Hillary also has publicly stated that her and her staff reviewed her emails and separated the personal emails from the State Department business emails. What is the security clearance of all of the people reviewing her emails?

When you build an email server, someone has to physically setup that server. Someone also has to run regular maintenance (such as installing Windows updates) and maintain backups. These tasks all require administrative rights to the server. And anyone with administrative rights to the server also has full access to the data and everything else on that server. Does all of the personnel she hired to perform these tasks have top level security clearance?

Hillary's camp is also trying to use the bogus excuse that the documents were not classified at the time. Does it not bother you that the Secretary Of State, one of the key players in designating what documents should be classified, does not have the skill set to recognize classified data when presented with it? And we should reward that deficient set of skills with a promotion to the White House? I don't think so.

Hillary's camp is also trying to justify her actions by saying that all previous Secretary of State's have done the same thing. That is a blatant lie. Not one previous Secretary Of State hired a private company to build a private email server and conduct their business through that outside server.

Hillary has done so many things that should disqualify her from public office, including lying to the families of the Benghazi, that it is baffling to me how anyone could support her. Apparently her followers are just like Trump's minions in the fact that it doesn't matter what they do, the good outweighs the negatives (in their minds). I'm curious as to what degree that threshold is. What actions could Hillary (or Trump) take that would preclude one of her sheeple from supporting her. She has already performed numerous of these actions, but the support continues. Amazing and disheartening. At least some of people have disavowed her (Yay)...and turned to a socialist. But that is the options on the Dem's side: a socialist or an unconvicted felon.

On a side note, one of the things that bothers me the most in Hillary's email scandal is the incompetence of the federal investigations. Hillary claims she has endured 50 bipartisan investigations into Benghazi. As far as I know, not one of the previous investigations has revealed the fact that Hillary was conducting her State Department business on a private email server. How is it that 49 of these investigations have failed to discover this? How is it that any competent person/people performing the task of an investigation fail to discover this fact? And in the course of many of these investigations Hillary was not even interviewed. I have reached the point now that anytime I hear that Congress or any other governmental agency is performing an investigation, I just laugh and think about what incompetent boobs are going to be running this dog and pony show.

[nappyroots]

Trump is pandering to tea party lowlifes, Cruz pretends to be a christian but is bought and paid for like a cheap prostitute and rubio has proved to be a nobody. Sanders is out in space and Hillary is living of the good old Clinton years, she hasn't lied no more than gw and dick. She also needs to fact check her info before opening her mouth. Maybe she needs some good old republican scare tactics, like Bernie is gonna go door to door and take your guns.

[PAMFAM10]

I said it several times Hillary will be our next president. Accept it now it will hurt less later.

[Hagar]

21 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

I said it several times Hillary will be our next president. Accept it now it will hurt less later.

I'd love to tell you how wrong you are, and show you all the reasons why, but since the Republicans are so busy fighting each other, I can't.   Still enough time for a miracle or an indictment, but I'm not going to hold my breath.  

Biggest losers will be the working people, for they are the ones who pay the bills for big government.  

[baddog]

Trump will stomp Hillary. Like him or not, we have to defeat the communists. I can't believe how many people don't care.

[Hagar]

14 minutes ago, baddog said:

Trump will stomp Hillary. Like him or not, we have to defeat the communists. I can't believe how many people don't care.

I hope you're right bd, but all this, "I ain't gonna vote if he (Trump, Cruz, Rubio) gets the nomination".  I don't get it.  It's hard for me to imagine someone I wouldn't vote for over Hillary.   

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, PAMFAM10 said:

I said it several times Hillary will be our next president. Accept it now it will hurt less later.

Nope...it will hurt a lot worse later...at least for the hard working taxpayer.

[PAMFAM10]

I'm just saying if I was a gambling man I'll be all in on Hillary.

[Hagar]

2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Nope...it will hurt a lot worse later...at least for the hard working taxpayer.

I'm Senile LRF - keep forgetting the most important thing about the next election, the SCOTUS.  With an open seat already, and four Socialist already on the Court, to me, it's the main reason for defeating the hildabeast.  If she wins our right to bear arms will be in jeopardy.