Jump to content

Running up the score


ST413

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Dick Vitale said:

So you get the kids to practice hard, play hard, and they are winning big....Now the kids that don't play as much get some time on the floor...Do you tell them to NOT continue the good habit of playing hard? I understand not pressing and such, but what do you do when your 12, 13, and number 14 guys are better than the other teams starters? Lay down? Just a rhetorical question...

In my post you do not see me say anything about not playing hard.

BTW, in most of these cases there are no 12, 13 and 14 players. And in most these scenarios, those end of bench players should be in game by start of 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AggiesAreWe said:

In my post you do not see me say anything about not playing hard.

BTW, in most of these cases there are no 12, 13 and 14 players. And in most these scenarios, those end of bench players should be in game by start of 3rd.

Our 2001 Ozen team had guys that were not in the rotation that would START at most places. I can relate to the issue of having a dominant team, I just don't agree with controlling the final outcome of a high school varsity game by some mercy rule...Its just not fair to the kids that work hard to be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, winwin said:

The better lesson is to finish what you start. Give it 100% until the end. You show mercy and respect when you pick someone up off the floor after you dunk on them. People get the two confused. I believe you can push kids and adults to compete until the end in sports and at the same time show mercy and compassion for people in need. I know people that turn into monsters while competing and then give you the shirt off their back. 

I agree with this.  I do feel there are ways to play hard and let the opponent have some breathing room as well like stopping pressing but not turning the ball over on purpose or missing shots on purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dick Vitale said:

Our 2001 Ozen team had guys that were not in the rotation that would START at most places. I can relate to the issue of having a dominant team, I just don't agree with controlling the final outcome of a high school varsity game by some mercy rule...Its just not fair to the kids that work hard to be good.

Don't get me wrong, I am not for any kind of mercy rule. I think coaches can handle these situations on their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silsbee in the Huntington tournament came from 29-30 points down in the 4th qtr to beat Marshall by 1 point and win the tournament if they would have had a mercy rule they would not have won the game ,every game is not going to be close some team are 30-40 or even 50 points better than other teams blow outs are going to happen, nba and nfl or even MLB there are no mercy rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/20/2016 at 1:23 PM, winwin said:

I agree that you should stop pressing. Even putting the bench in is ok. But the 5 on the floor have to keep playing hard and try to score. Whats missing in the conversation is HOW the score was run up. We beat Sabine Pass last year by 90 without pressing and with the bench in. Just looking at the score, one may think we were going all out and tring to kick em when they were down. But that wasnt the case

And that is normally the case. 1 starter in maybe with a few bench players. Especially among the smaller schools that don't have a large bench. Some of the kids playing and scoring in these games it may be the most time they play all year or in some cases one of the only times they may play. Shoot 3's, dunk, and have fun. They may never have the opportunity to play after highschool. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been on both sides of this as a player and as a parent.  And it is entirely about respecting your opponent while the beat down is happening.  Lost a FB game in college by 70 pts and never felt disrespected.  They were just that much better.  Lost another game by about 50 and wanted to kill their coach because he was still throwing 50 yd passes in the 4th qtr.  If I saw that man on fire today, I wouldn't piss on him to put it out.

Lumberton has been beat by 80+ pts by Central and never felt disrespected.  Without mercy rules to "save you", you learn a valuable life lesson.  That lesson is To keep fighting like hell even when you are getting your ass handed to you. Don't ever give up!  

Then later in life when you are faced with death of family members, loss of jobs, terminal illness, etc, you are better equipped to handle the adversities.  Nobody is going to enforce a mercy rule when chemo or something else is kicking your ass.  Toughen up and become a fighter!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HSbballFan said:

And that is normally the case. 1 starter in maybe with a few bench players. Especially among the smaller schools that don't have a large bench. Some of the kids playing and scoring in these games it may be the most time they play all year or in some cases one of the only times they may play. Shoot 3's, dunk, and have fun. They may never have the opportunity to play after highschool. 

That's the most logical point right there. We're talking about HS kids here and for 98% of them, they will never play after May 31st of their SR year.

Let them have fun, run it up, pour it on whoever they are playing. It's at the professional level I feel is where the whole "respect your opponent/ coach comes into play"..........even in the collegiate ranks, nothing wrong with shutting down with a big lead in the 4th qtr to get the underclassmen some playing time or even walk-ons (Rudy) but at the HS level, just let the kids play. They are kids and if they get their arse spanked, they'll learn to quit the sport or get better at it.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...