Jump to content

Texas at #12 Baylor


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

Texas is kicking that butt so far.  For those that are watching, am I being biased when I say that the Baylor qb body slammed the defender who had picked him off after the defender had stepped out of bounds and given himself up?  It happened right in front of the Texas bench, and led to a bench clearing fight, but the announcers all seemed to act like the Texas players were entirely to blame, and that the Baylor player had done nothing wrong.  You can clearly see the official blowing the play dead before the Baylor qb pulled the wrestling body slam tackle.


 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texas is kicking that butt so far.  For those that are watching, am I being biased when I say that the Baylor qb body slammed the defender who had picked him off after the defender had stepped out of bounds and given himself up?  It happened right in front of the Texas bench, and led to a bench clearing fight, but the announcers all seemed to act like the Texas players were entirely to blame, and that the Baylor player had done nothing wrong.  You can clearly see the official blowing the play dead before the Baylor qb pulled the wrestling body slam tackle.


 

 
  •  

I thought it was may have been rough, but Texas players should have just let be and hit him a little late the next possession if they were that angry. It wasn't bad enough to warrant any reaction such as shoving a the Baylor WR/QB down right in front of the ref and then surrounding him because the Texas wasn't hurt. It's 17-0 and Baylor is using a WR, that already sad enough. I have been saying all season, that Baylor with their attitude on offense was going to get into a fight, and I think this was just the beginning. This game will probably not be one either will want to remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they lose this game to a waterboy QB. They better cut and fire the whole damn lot.

Baylor talks so much crap. The Baptist convention needs to revoke their charter. Thug U.

Already have a long time ago. I think it was in the early 2000s. That's why you hear from old Baylor graduates, "I went to school when Baylor was Baptist."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...