Jump to content

Hands down best Football Program in SETX over the last 40 years!

BADSANTA

By BADSANTA
in High School Football- 2014

 Share

Recommended Posts

AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted

Definitely Newton!
4 title appearances
3 state titles
380-107-2 in the last 40 seasons.
9.5 wins a season average!
only 3 losing seasons!

 

While in comparison WO-S "only" has 2 state titles, they do have 4 state final appearances and a higher winning percentage than Newton. WO-S only has 1 losing season in it's 37 year history. (3-7 in 1983)

 

WO-S all time record: 340-88-3

 

winning percentage of 79%

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BMTSoulja1

BMTSoulja1

Posted
Posted

While in comparison WO-S "only" has 2 state titles, they do have 4 state final appearances and a higher winning percentage than Newton. WO-S only has 1 losing season in it's 37 year history. (3-7 in 1983)

WO-S all time record: 340-88-3

winning percentage of 79%

Although they finished 8-2 both times, they missed the playoffs while in the local 4a district. Would that be considered a losing season or not?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NewtonNation

NewtonNation

Posted
Posted

While in comparison WO-S "only" has 2 state titles, they do have 4 state final appearances and a higher winning percentage than Newton. WO-S only has 1 losing season in it's 37 year history. (3-7 in 1983)

WO-S all time record: 340-88-3

winning percentage of 79%


WOS has us in wins, nobody can compete with their win %.
Newton having titles spread out from the 70's, 90's and 2000's is better when looking at a 40 year span. IMO

I do think WOS is a close 2nd though!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted

Although they finished 8-2 both times, they missed the playoffs while in the local 4a district. Would that be considered a losing season or not?

 

Definition of losing season= having more losses than wins.

 

Now one can debate if it's considered a successful season or not. That is still arbitrary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BMTSoulja1

BMTSoulja1

Posted
Posted

Definition of losing season= having more losses than wins.

Now one can debate if it's considered a successful season or not. That is still arbitrary.

Ok. I see, that's why I said that. So with that logic, a team that finish under .500 and go on to make the playoffs AND makes noise... In a sense, would that mot be considered a 'winning aeason'?
Ok, maybe I'm overthinking this big time...
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kicker

kicker

Posted
Posted

Lamarque then Katy then WOS.
If were talkin just the GT and lakes area parts of SETX, WOS then Newton. If not for one of the most powerful football programs in the history of Texas football in Lamarque during the 90's and 00's, WOS could have several more title appearances.


Yep, they were our nemasis. '93 lost to them and they win state*. We probably would have made the state game if we won. '95, same scenario. They win state. '97 we lose to them and they win state. As a matter of fact, you could arguably say that if we were D1 that year we win it all. We gave the D1 champs, Texas City, their only loss of the season. Finally got them in 2000 in the quarters. probably one of the best games WOS has ever played.

*pretty sure it was '93
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kicker

kicker

Posted
Posted

Yep, they were our nemasis. '93 lost to them and they win state*. We probably would have made the state game if we won. '95, same scenario. They win state. '97 we lose to them and they win state. As a matter of fact, you could arguably say that if we were D1 that year we win it all. We gave the D1 champs, Texas City, their only loss of the season. Finally got them in 2000 in the quarters. Then played Kerville Tivy(i think) in the semis then lost to Ennis in the finals.

*pretty sure it was '93

Link to comment
Share on other sites
skipmeister

skipmeister

Posted
Posted
If WOS made the playoffs back in '99, we would have beaten Lamarque in the third round and eventually would face PNG in the regional quarterfinals! The Mustangs would win that game, too! Instead of those Indians playing Stephenville in the State Finals, it would have been us and we would eventually upset them!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • bullets13
      Bridge City is open

      By bullets13 · Posted

      I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • Eagles12
      Bridge City is open

      By Eagles12 · Posted

      He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • 72 Pinto
      LC-M is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • 72 Pinto
      Bridge City is open

      By 72 Pinto · Posted

      Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...