
Setx fan
-
Posts
2,059 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Posts posted by Setx fan
-
-
1 minute ago, baddog said:
I expect better decisions from college aged kids. They can vote and drink (most of them legally) and old enough to die for their country. I’m not giving them a pass to destroy entire cities because they are naive.
Again. $8 billion in damages, over 150 cops injured, some blinded by lasers, several people shot and killed, but none of that bothers you. One person gets shot by a rubber bullet and you come unglued about protecting HIS rights. I call BS on that one my friend. Your priorities are skewed.
1. You stated your opinion about the kid’s decision but not the Fed. I think most people in there right mind would hold a Federal Agent to a higher standard than some kid off the street. Also there’s no evidence the kid destroyed anything lol
2. Are those numbers for the nation as a whole or just Portland? Are those numbers from before or after July 12? Did the numbers slow down or get worse in Portland after they shot the peaceful protester in the head?
-
3 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:
Here’s the deal.... if my buddy comes by and asks me to give him a ride to town, then asks me to stop right there in front of the bank. Then he walks in and runs back out with a bag o’ money. Guess what? I’m a bank robber, too.
The media keeps pushing the false narrative that these are “mostly peaceful protestors,” but once the first brick gets chunked, you’re a rioter, too. That 11-year old girl holding a sign is just as much of a rioter as the dude carrying TVs out the store window. They all took part in the riot.
It’s not that hard to understand.Here’s the deal.... Nobody has brung up any evidence that there was actually any rioting at that location the night he was shot. Much less anyone around him for them to be shooting anywhere in his direction. Also I never said it was a great idea to go out and protest in the night hours. The whole point of me bringing up him being shot was to point out that it’s probably not a good idea to shoot someone that could be perceived as a peaceful protester if your trying to resolve civil unrest. You actually just add fuel to the fire. I don’t expect young college aged people to always make great decisions. I do expect better from Federal Agents.
-
22 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:
Other than participating in a riot.
Didn’t know he was participating in a riot
-
47 minutes ago, stevenash said:
I would suggest to you that two minutes of video is hardly adequate to determine his conduct
Correct. You have more info on the incident?
-
1 minute ago, stevenash said:
And, based upon a two minute video, you " know" that he is not a rioter?
Based on the video I’ve seen, there’s no evidence of him being a rioter.
-
1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:
There are a lot more things I have ahead of knowing all the intricate details around a rioter being put down.
That’s exactly what I’m talking about. Your calling him a rioter and you have no evidence of him being rioter. Making statements on things you aren’t informed about is dangerous unless your ok with deception
-
Just now, LumRaiderFan said:
No, why would I need it?
IDK maybe so you can have an informed opinion.
-
21 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:
There might be a remote possibility that you aren't privy to all that was going on by watching a 2 minute video.
Maybe. You have more information on it?
-
2 minutes ago, baddog said:
If this is the guy who got shot, I have already offered my stance.
Gee Officer, I wasn’t doing nothing. I was just watching them throw bricks, set stores on fire, and blind you with lasers, but I’m innocent. Someone shot a rubber bullet and it hit me. I’m suing. Lmao. Glad he got shot.
Wasn’t aware all that was going on. Didn’t catch that on the video
-
7 minutes ago, baddog said:
I wasn’t there. Neither were you.
Exactly
-
35 minutes ago, baddog said:
He explained it rather well. If you are in the crowd that is rioting, you're a rioter.
That doesn’t answer my question
-
7 minutes ago, stevenash said:
why dont you tell us?
If you really want to know you would find out. Not like your going to listen to me lol
-
10 hours ago, tvc184 said:
Texas law (with each state being different) says that if there is a riot and you remain there, you are guilty of Riot and can be charged with a B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in jail). Then it goes on to say that you can additionally be charged with the most serious crime that was committed by anyone in the riot. So if someone sets fire to a car and you are there as part of the riot, they can charge you with felony arson without having to prove that you said the fire. You fail to disperse from the scene of a riot.
Was Donavan around or partaking in a riot?
-
5 minutes ago, baddog said:
I’m glad he got shot in the head. Of course the one that got shot was the “peaceful one”. Need to shoot a few more.
Sounds legit
-
4 minutes ago, stevenash said:
Doesnt matter how long it has been. If you break the law, you reap the consequences.
Sounds legit
-
Just now, stevenash said:
You missed the point. The violence started not with the authorities but with the protestors
You know how long there’s been tension between protesters and local police in Portland?
-
Just now, stevenash said:
May 31-
The conversation was cut short though, because around 11:30 p.m.,
some protesters were setting off fireworks and "aerial morters" at officers. Police declared the gathering an unlawful assembly a short time later.Police used flash bangs and tear gas to disperse protesters. The group splintered into smaller groups and there were reports of vandalism and people setting fires through the early morning hours of Monday.
Twelve people were arrested, police said.
Local police/ federal agents. Two different situations.
-
20 minutes ago, stevenash said:
Umm, the date of the incidents are kind of important my guy. Donavan La Bella was shot in the head with a “less leathal” bullet on July 12 while standing across the street from federal agents holding a boombox over his head. He now suffers a fractured skull. I searched near and far and couldn’t find a time a federal officer was injured before then. My guess is that a peaceful protester being shot in the head would probably raise tension which could possibly lead to more rioting and federal agents being injured. Makes sense to me but aye what do I know.
-
2 hours ago, stevenash said:
How did this happen if there were just peaceful protesters?
sixAccording to authorities, six federal officers were injured during the overnight protest, with one suffering a concussion and another taken to the hospital for burnsWhich night?
-
Just now, stevenash said:
then give me a link
Google
-
17 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:
The federal police aren't the problem. Rioters are.
I would hope federal police aren’t the problem since they’re supposed to be the solution lol.
-
59 minutes ago, stevenash said:
You "heard" they shot a peaceful protester? I would be interested in something a little more substantial than you "heard" that. I "heard" that Mr. Obama was not a U.S. citizen. Please point me to a link that documents what you claim. Or did you possibly just echo something you heard one of your associates utter?
The video is on multiple sites.
-
19 minutes ago, stevenash said:
They werent there to squash anything except to protect federal property
Yea you have to protect that property at all cost. Heard they shot a peaceful protester also. “Yea lets go over there and cause more tension in the name of property and leave without fixing the problem”
-
3 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:
They already left.
I guess they squashed all that and it started back when they left
Portland Has Fallen: Over 150 Shots Fired In The Democrat ‘Controlled’ City Over Night!
in Political Forum
Posted
The number of protestors/ rioters allegedly got higher when Feds arrived. If someone attacks me I might possibly retaliate against the attacker. Not some guy standing 30 or 40 yards away from me holding a radio over his head with both hands