Setx fan

59 minutes ago, 89Falcon said:

Jasper lost to Shepherd because Shepherd had better players by a good margin. It would not have mattered who Jasper played in the pre district schedule. It is going to be worse next year because nearly every player on the roster is returning for Shepherd and Shepherd will have much more depth. 

We'll see 

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

We know why they made it that far with Crumedy just like we know why they missed the playoffs with Crumedy.

I don't think Barbay ever missed while at Jasper. Not 100% sure about it though.

Barbay was probably never in a district as tough as the one Crumedy had either. Most disappointing thing about Crumedy's stay was the loss to Shepherd. I think low team morale played into that a little. Maybe if he had scheduled a little lighter for preseason they go into that game feeling a little better about themselves and possibly pull off a win. I don't think the people at Jasper care much for barely making the playoffs though. They want to be serious state contenders and that's probably why he scheduled the teams he scheduled. 

1 hour ago, 89Falcon said:

Especially since he will be doing it without WRs this coming year. 

We got more receivers available if the coaching staff chooses the right replacements . Hopefully he can get some work in with them this spring and summer. He played with a couple of them on jv a couple years back. Nearly the entire OLine returns. They need major gains in the weight room though 

23 hours ago, pngfan316 said:

Babin has decommited

I figured it was a strong possibility he'd decommit from the moment I heard he committed. Its smart to keep your options open in most cases. I expect he'll probably pick up a significant amount of offers after some summer visits and a really good senior season. 

Just now, 88Warrior said:

Woodville reported a whopping 20 more kids than Warren…Classroom size isn’t the issue…

Your probably right 

19 hours ago, purpleeagle said:

They are saying that the football coaches are not developing  the players . 

OK I misunderstood what you were saying. Coaches can't seem to get the best out of all the players though. Lot of guys didn't play up to their potential. Partially because some weren't being put on the field. Defense was just horrible the majority of the year. Offense was pretty good as expected but it was questionable at times also. Critical play near the goal line against Edgewood and we hand it up the middle to a hundred pound sophomore (very talented but still young) instead of giving it to our senior 230 pound returning offensive player of the year who scored the game winning TD in the state semi finals the year before. That play ended up being ruled a fumble when that probably could have been avoided. I was very confused about that 

38 minutes ago, purpleeagle said:

Just might be some of these fan coaches are not too far off with the Woodville football program. You might want to look at Woodville's sub varsity scores. Being  a large 3A2 team they should have better sub varsity teams. Same goes for Warren. It all starts down there. Example— Newton Jv 50 Woodville 0.

"Fan coaches" got nothing to do with that. 

9 minutes ago, myrecordwashorrible said:

68 score for Kirbyville.  1 point better. 

FWIW, I am simply being a smart butt.  Wish all the schools in the entire setx area had no school below B. 

Yea but thanks. I did some research and it definitely looks like Woodville's overall academic performance has significantly dropped in recent years. I didn't realize it was getting that bad 

25 minutes ago, myrecordwashorrible said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Well, on second thought???

OK so compare it to Kirbyville 

2 hours ago, TC2020 said:

I think I remember reading the following in the paper for Accountability Ratings -

Spurger ISD B-

Warren ISD B-

Colmesniel ISD B-

Woodville ISD C+
 

All are pretty equal. 

Not too bad considering Woodville has the bigger classrooms of these schools. Kids are able to learn better in smaller classrooms but I'm pretty sure Woodville is above average compared to other schools it's size. All the Tyler County schools are decent though 

15 hours ago, myrecordwashorrible said:

Is that a bit like saying, "I have the best looking ugly wife of all my friends?"

I'm pretty sure Woodville is above average academically so this analogy doesn't fit. 

OK State wouldn't be a bad choice in my opinion being that Braylon Rigsby just transferred there from Texas Tech I believe 

8 minutes ago, oldeagle said:

Woodville is just fine. Woodville was 9-3. We fumbled the go ahead touchdown in the end zone of the Area game. We had a good year. This team did not have the defense to go to State. 

I hope so. But judging by Woodville's performance from 7th through varsity it looks like it might be going down hill. The defense definitely could have been better than what was shown last year and that needs to be fixed 

2 minutes ago, 89Falcon said:

When you folks run off the current coach you should target the little coaches for his replacement or at least get someone out of the stands to personnel the team for the new HC. 

He's probably not going anywhere unless he decides to leave. He's in good with the right people. 

22 hours ago, oldschool2 said:

WV wouldn't have lost any games all year if the coaches would have had the players in the right position.  Or something like that..

I remember reading it before. 

Probably would have lost to Newton either way. Good chance we'd have won at least 2 more with some personnel adjustments in the defensive front though. Edgewood was definitely a winnable game.

10 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

Wall and Gunter are moving to D1 was the talk..

That sucks. It would feel a lot better to beat one of those (especially Gunter) in the state game. 

49 minutes ago, gary-us-bonds said:

Trick play and a blocked punt for a TD early and Wall held on for dear life the rest of the way 

 

Yea that's basically it there. They got up by two scores early and their defense was good enough that Newton couldn't score quickly enough before they ran out of time. 

5 minutes ago, CCRed said:

Are you serious ?  Most of them were false starts that were obvious on the replays. I never saw the Newton coach complain to the refs about any call. 

I saw at least 2 holding calls at critical moments that I thought were questionable. Not saying they were bad calls. Just saying I didn't see what they saw 

7 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

Two Newton players in position to recover that onside got in each others way 

One of them had it in his hands. Gotta hold on to that 

Close one. Porter was amazing. Willed his way for tough yardage all night even though the defense was totally keyed in on him. Then that TD catch was super clutch. 

5 minutes ago, NHSBulldogFan said:

Flags are also killing Newton tonight 

Some of the flags against the offense look questionable to me 

Looks like Wall made up their mind they wouldn't let Porter beat them after that first drive. Newton probably needs to try some different looks Wall might not have seen on film and try to protect the freshman QB a little better 

Looks like Wall probably has the best OLine Newton has seen this year other than WOS maybe. Newton's front 7 might not be able to penetrate as quickly and rapidly but if they keep chipping at it they'll make some plays down the stretch. I think it could possibly be close for 2 or 3 quarters with Newton pulling away at the end 

Stangs with the upset. Go stangs! 

15 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Yup

That sucks