Englebert

I think this actually illustrates the immigration topic through the eyes of Liberals. Many, if not most, Liberals believe that those against illegal immigration hate the immigrants, when in fact most hate the burden placed on our society. Either way it is definitely funny.

I've been saying for years that the power to pardon and commute sentences should be stripped from Presidents and Governors. I think the President (and Governors) should only have to power to order a new trial, not pardon or commute.

I agree. If it is true that the President can pardon themselves, then that power needs to be stripped immediately. I don't know if it would take a constitutional amendment, but it needs to be gone. And as with any law, a few legal expert's opinions doesn't really mean squat. I would like to hear from the Supreme Court.

I guess people will have different opinions as to where they want Hillary to go.

Trump should use this slogan over and over and over.

I've heard a few legal "experts" say that if Hillary wins the presidency, she can pardon herself. I heard one say she cannot. Anyone with an once of moral fiber would resign, but I don't see Hillary doing that.

I don't know the answer for a fact, but I'm fairly confident that anyone can run while under investigation. The U.S. Justice system is setup as "innocent until proven guilty". Preventing anyone from running for office while under investigation flies in the face of this. Same thing as creating a list to prevent someone from buying a gun that is under investigation. The practice could would be severely abused in short order. For example, if you and I were running for the same office, I could photoshop some photos of you engaging in illegal activity, then present them to law enforcement days before the election (or some other kind of trumped-up evidence that would take a minimum of a few days of investigation.) Even though you would be exonerated, the race would be over. This happens all the time by candidates trying to sway voters opinions, but shouldn't legally prevent someone from running.

And many folks act like he's racist, misogynist, homophobic, deplorable, xenophobic, etc. You have accused Trump of being many of the above mentioned. No one on this site has ever said that Trump is 100% truthful and a saint. I wish I could find one of those brain filters you seem to have. It sure is good at filtering out stuff you don't want to see and letting in information that seems to support your Liberal biased outlook. Do they sell them on Amazon? Or does it just develop over years of reading those secret history books?

If you don't want to see Cheney and Hannity then shut your eyes when you get into bed instead of staring at them on your ceiling. And please elaborate on what you think Cheney did?

You continually post links from Huffington Post and Politifact and all of a sudden you are worried if a site is credible. Did you really just post this or did someone hack your account?

I was wondering myself. I thought I was down by 6 then should be down by 4 after this week. I wasn't complaining though.

If men in this country really wanted to "keep women down", does anyone actually think this would be the route we would take to accomplish that goal? This is one nut-case batty woman. But astonishingly, many will believe her.

And the Russians.

Do you think the speaker was talking metaphorically about the death of Hillary's campaign? Or do you just take the author's biased opinion at face value like a good little sheeple. And why did the author of the article not mention the Vice President declaring his aspirations of causing great physical harm to Trump? Typical Liberal sheeple!

I'm guessing Comey's conscious got the better of him, along with all of the backlash. He knows he initially made the wrong decision (under heavy pressure) and has finally decided to try to absolve his guilt. A second theory is that the Clinton Foundation checked bounced. A third theory is that Obama's hatred for the Clintons boiled back up and he flip-flopped and gave Comey the green light to prosecute Hillary. I doubt this because Obama knows Hillary will carry on his legacy. A fourth theory is that Trump promised Comey a cushy future if he re-opened the investigation. I highly doubt this one, but then again, I used to think the FBI was above reproach. I'm very curious to learn the circumstances involving Anthony Weiner. Huma Abedin has filed for divorce. Did Weiner go to the FBI and tell them he has all of these emails in an effort to retaliate against Huma and Hillary? Did Weiner make a deal with the FBI to hand over this evidence to help him with his own legal troubles? I would not be surprised if it is the former, or possibly even a combination.

You do know that the Whites that burned the Tulsa community were Democrats don't you. Why do you continue to support a political party that has their roots stemmed in the KKK and violent racist acts? You have an awfully convenient and selective way of choosing who flip-flops, who evolves, and who can never change their stripes.

Navasota's cheer squad outnumbers their fans.

1. Kingwood/Baytown Sterling 2. Humble/Crosby 3. New Caney/Porter 4. Baytown Lee/Port Arthur Memorial 5. Livingston/Beaumont Central 6. Lumberton/Nederland 7. Cleveland/Little Cypress-Mauriceville 8. Huffman Hargrave/Silsbee 9. Navasota/Bridge City 10. Rusk/Diboll 11. Liberty/West Orange-Stark 12. Orangefield/Hardin-Jefferson 13. Trinity/Kirbyville 14. Corrigan-Camden/Frankston 15. Crockett/Garrison 16. Newton/Hemphill 17. San Augustine/Joaquin 18. Centerville/Groveton 19. West Sabine/Deweyville 20. Colmesneil/Sabine Pass 21. Evadale/Iola 22. Port Neches-Groves/Beaumont Ozen 23. Bellville/Madisonville 24. Buna/Warren 25. East Chambers/Hitchcock

We need to monitor the polls. In fact, we should get people dressed in white sheets holding nightsticks to stand outside of them. And when we win the election, appoint an Attorney General that will drop all charges on these "poll watchers". And while we are at it, we can instruct the IRS to target Democrat organizations. And we can pass laws designed to enslave Americans by feeding Americans falsified data, blatant lying, and enticing Congressmen with payoffs and kickbacks in return for their vote. We can get away with crimes such a gunrunning because we have the Attorney General and head of the FBI in our back pocket. We can avoid FOI laws by using illegal methods, afterall, we control the enforcing agents. There's so much illegal crap we can do by just studying the past administration.

If the insurance companies are taking advantage of people by stealing their money, why don't you open your own insurance company and charge a fair price. Instead of running your mouth complaining, you have every opportunity in this great country to solve the problem yourself instead of relying on the government to solve your problems. Which path will you choose...working on a solution yourself or whining to the government?

I'm sure the media is hiding this fact. I don't think they would want to show the American public anything like that. (I don't think it is possible to be more sarcastic than this.) If this was actually true even your boyfriend Hannity would have reported it on his show. You seem have a lot of racism living in your head. And what were you doing at a Trump rally to witness this behavior? Were you one of those being paid to attend and harass the Trump supporters?

Man you are fixated on Hannity. Anyone fixated that much has to be in love. Just admit it, you're in love with Hannity. I bet you have a poster of him over your bed...right beside your Rush Limbaugh picture.

And even though you've been asked repeatedly, you still can't name a single lie by Hannity. What does this make you?

Yes I do need more proof than that. You are saying the temperature of Earth has risen since Man starting emitting CO2. That is a correlation, and correlations do not prove causation. When the stock market rises, women's skirt lengths rise. Do you think the stock market caused woman's skirts to get shorter? And how do you explain Earth's rise in temperature before man existed? And do you know how much CO2 is released in one volcano eruption versus how much CO2 man has emitted in his existence on Earth? And common logic, if you are in the mezzanine section in the south end of the end zone of Cowboy Stadium, and I'm in the mezzanine of the north end, if you light a cigarette do you really think I will get cancer from second hand smoke? And please answer how much increased CO2 the Earth can handle before detrimental effects occur. After all, the human body can handle certain amounts of poison. Once you cross a certain limit, the poison will have adverse effects on your body. In fact, the way to immune your body from certain things is to inoculate yourself with small amounts. So how do you know that man emitting CO2 in the atmosphere is even harmful? Please show me the proof. And again, I don't know the answer. And the scientists don't know the answer. So why do the politicians want to shut down the debate?

You left out the most plausible scenario. It is a movement by the government and others to convince Americans to invest trillions of dollars into cleaning our environment, and to give trillions to other countries for them to clean their environments. To invest money that Americans would be unwilling to give up unless a crisis existed. So if 97% of environmental scientists agree that CO2 is killing the planet, and that man is responsible, why won't (can't) they show the human linkage? Why won't (can't) they show how this warming is catastrophic...or even detrimental? Why do the supporters say the debate is over and call everyone else deniers? Who are these people denying anything? Why won't these environmental leaders debate? And like most people on my side of the debate, I don't know if the scientists are lying. I do know for a fact that the debate is not over. I don't have a problem with the pursuit of alternative energy. I think that is a good thing. I don't have a problem with some regulations designed to keep or country as clean as possible. But I'm not willing to spend trillions of dollars on unproven theories in which the "solutions" are even more unproven. And who really cares? Every American should. You won't be able to hold on to your wallet tight enough to keep them out.