Englebert

Would that matter to you? You voted for a presidential candidate that did ten times worse for what Patraeus was convicted. It didn't matter to you for the simple fact that Hillary has a "D" behind her name. It is shameful that you can ignore an treasonous act of an elitist but feel the need to silence a person you know nothing about.

How about educating yourself. Here's some reading material to start with: [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] A simple Bing search will give you a plethora of reading material. But none can't quantify with verifiable data the number of lives saved through actual defensive gun use or a deterrent effect. I actually came to the realization of what LOL really means when thinking if you would take the time to educate yourself on the topic.

Then why do you have Hannity's poster on the ceiling above your bed? Just admit you have a crush on Hannity. It is obvious to everyone on this board.

Your party just re-elected Nancy Pelosi to minority speaker. I can't believe anyone would possibly have the nerve to try and disparage anyone else after that brain-dead vote. I'm so glad to see the Liberals hanging on with a death grip of the Democrat Party. You know, the party that has failed policies and just throws personal insults at anyone that disagrees with them. You appear to fit right in.

The group that voted for and approved Affirmative Action Laws, desegregation, trillions of dollars in welfare programs, diversity in every facet of life...is this the group to which you are referring?

Yes you are correct on selective memory. That skill is the pure domain of the Liberal hypocrites. Somehow Huffington Post is trying to rewrite history, creating a false memory, that there were millions of people rioting and looting under the guise of protesting Obama's legitimacy as president. How do you read this crap? Better yet, do you really think we are so weak minded that we will fall for this? I guess the real definition of "enlightened" is easily manipulated. The author is an embarrassment to 6th graders everywhere.

I'm curious as to whether nappyroots will attribute Trump's position as flip-flopping or evolving. Since he feels the "R" and "D" are blurred in this case, he might have trouble figuring which attribute to label Trump. He might have to actually think for once. On second thought, nah...he will just wait for the Liberal leaders to tell him which way to think.

Wow, that's from before Clinton and Obama were staunchly against gay marriage.

Huffington Post espouses their full-blown spin and distortion as their Liberal sheeple eat up the lies like candy. Halloween Part 2 for the easily manipulated. Why don't you find the same story on a respectable news outlet and read what is really going on. I know that is an unfathomable task for you. For some reason you seem content with just shining the boots of your Liberal spin masters.

Does anybody on this planet give a flying flip about what Seth Meyers has to say?

Material will be less than what was available from the last 8 years, but the comedians will now be allowed to comment on it without being labelled racist.

That article is hilarious. The first paragraph says that the U.S. was a laughingstock in 2008. Everyone knows we didn't become a laughingstock until after Obama assumed office, started implementing his failed policies and went on his apology tour. One of the first "accomplishments" states that he appointed an IT CIO to oversee spending and efficiency. It seems the author omitted the fact that this chief oversaw the failed rollout of the Obamacare website, which by the way, crashed on rollout, cost the American taxpayers 2 billion dollars and still rising, was developed by a Canadian based company who's senior vice-president went to school and is friends with Michelle Obama, gathers and stores American citizens personal information but fails to employ adequate security...I could go on for days, but the author thinks this is an "accomplishment". I had to stop right there. Did you actually read this list of "accomplishments"? And if so, I am very curious as to why you felt the need to post a link. Are you as embarrassed for the author as I am? Bless his little heart. At least he tried. Failed miserably, but a least he tried. Let's all joined together and see if we can get him a participation trophy. [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content]

So you believe some people are elitist and above the law. That is shameful. And I dare you to find anyone on here that would say Dick Cheney should not be held accountable if he committed unlawful acts. Your attempt at moral equivalency is pathetic at best. And our president elect has also said (many times) he wants to lock her up. It's odd how you can hear a never-ending flip-flop but only hear to point you want to hear. That ability must be a side effect of Liberal Disease Syndrome.

Uh-oh, looks like someone else has a man-crush on Hannity and Rush. Do you have their posters on your ceiling like new tobie?

Clap.

I'm curious, if hell freezes over and they do carve Obama's face into Mount Rushmore, what color would his face be?

How do you feel? Should she be locked up if found that she indeed commit unlawful acts, just as others have been locked up? I'm very curious to know if you think the rule of law should apply to everyone or if you will continue to bow and obey your party leaders wishes. Please enlighten us. It is a very, very simple question and no need for your usual avoidance.

And this is why your party got kicked to the curb. They are as delusional as you.

You hit the nail on the head, except you aimed it at the wrong party. If the Democrat leaders would stop calling the non-protected people racist, misogynist, bigots, homophones, xenophobes, deplorables, etc., etc., etc. and stop accepting hate groups into their party...the groups that display the most vile imaginable whenever someone doesn't bow and conform to their warped way of thinking. Most non-minorities are sick of the constant unfounded accusations, especially from the likes of hate-filled Liberals. It's ironic and pathetic that the Party Of Hate spews copious amounts of vitriol at non-minorities for racial stereotyping, but are the ones guilty of placing their little labels on everyone imaginable. What a sad and deeply depressing shock it is to those who eventually come to the realization that the party they thought was so righteous is guilty of everything they preach against. The others will just continue to live in denial.

I'm showing 11 [11 man] programs besides WOS. Which ones did I get wrong? Amarillo (27: 1933-1935, 27:1935-1937) Bremond (29: 1981-1982, 31:2014-2015) Celina (68: 1998-2002, 31: 2005-2006) Crawford (24: 1961-1963, 29: 2004-2005) Euless Trinity (27: 2007-2008, 28: 2009-2010) Katy (4) (27: 1958-1960, 32: 1997-1999, 24: 2003-2004, 31: 2012-2013) Lake Travis (48: 2007-2010, 25: 2010-2012) Mart (26: 1968-1970, 30: 1999-2000) Southlake Carroll (4) (28: 1988-1989; 33: 1992-1994, 31: 2002-2003, 49: 2004-2007) Stephenville (32: 1993-1994, 26: 1998-1999) Tyler (26: 1972-1974, 27: 1994-1995) West Orange-Stark (24: 1986-1988, 23: 2015-Present)

I think Fort Hancock is one. And I think Amarillo is another. [Just saw someone else posted this one.]

I'm out of likes. And many, even some on this board, will still believe Obama received far more criticism and was the target of hate more that Trump.

If you could comprehend you would realize that nobody on this board ignored anything. In fact, the consensus on this board was that he was the second worse candidate in history, but was blessed by running against the worst candidate in history. The Liberals have no one to blame but themselves, but keeping in form, Liberals always resort to pointing the finger at someone else. Your post isn't worth the usual courtesy clap. Try and put a little more thought into the next one.

Because he has to work with Congress to repeal it. Read a little bit some time. Ooops, I forgot. Clap.

Clap.