Englebert

I did notice you used the word "denier" in your earlier post. Like I've said over and over, no one is "denying" anything. All I'm asking for is proof that man is the main culprit (as the theory states). To do this, one must also study factors other than man. There are many other contributors to changes in Earth's weather, and to say man is the main cause is a confession of the true "denier". A denier is one that says man is the cause while discounting volcanos. A denier is one that says man is the cause while discounting the moon's fluctuating orbit and tug on the earth. A denier is one that says man is the cause while discounting earth's fluctuating axis tilt and fluctuating orbit around the sun. A denier is one that says man is the cause while discounting solar activity (which I believe will ultimately prove to be the main driving force behind the changes in earth's weather patterns.) A denier is one that says man is the cause and the debate is over. And since I've read so many propaganda theories on Man-Made Global Warming, I'm highly uninterested in wasting 42 minutes of my life on another one that is sure to be disappointing. A big help and time saver would be for someone to post the times in the video that deal with the above mentioned factors. I am highly interested to watch the part that proves solar activity is not the main driving force of climate change, but am also interested in learning how the fluctuations in earth's and moon's orbit are proved to also have negligible effects. I feel the need to restate my position (and many others). No one is and has ever denied climate change is occurring. Along with common observations, videos and research papers have adequately documented this. But none have one iota of proof that man is the main driving force behind this change, or that any changes in man's activities will curtail this change. Common sense dictates that man is not the culprit considering earth's climate has fluctuated wildly before man graced the earth with our presence, and climate will change once man has run his course. But no one is denying man could be the main factor. Show me the proof. It's like a prosecutor spending three weeks proving a murder has been committed, then points at the defendant and says "He's the culprit". The jury can get behind the prosecutor in the fact that a murder was committed, but would be highly derelict in their duty if they chose to prosecute the defendant with no evidence that he was the one that committed the proven act. And not one study can adequately document whether this change in weather is detrimental or possibly helpful to the longevity of a hospitable climate. In keeping with the above analogy, who's to say that the murder was not a good thing. After all, the "victim" could have been named Hitler and his demised ultimately proved to save millions of lives. One part of the Man-Made Global Warming theory that I (and everyone) can support and believe as proven fact beyond reproach is that the southern winds coming up from the Gulf Of Mexico has increased in intensity over the last 100 years. It is undeniable due to the fact that OU sucks.

I couldn't watch all of this. I tried, I really did. I skipped through parts. But from everything I did watch, it is the same old same old. (That's why I skipped through much of it.) I'll go back and try and watch it later. But I'm not very optimistic any new information will be gleaned. If you hadn't already, read the link that Reagan posted. And that viewpoint is not some off-the-wall outlier. There are many studies and research papers that cast doubt to flat out rejecting the Man-Made Global Warming theory. They are just harder to find since they don't fit the narrative. If a researcher came to HBO and said I want to do a story disproving Man-Made Global Warming, do you think HBO would film it?

Like I said, you have no conscious or self respect. Pitiful!

You've been caught in so many lies I am shocked you have the nerve to get on here and spread more. I guess life is good when you have no conscious and self-respect.

Sounds like a bunch of little sunflowers sitting in the audience that probably didn't even vote. I guess they thought Pence and Family invaded their safe space, so they displayed their hate. I encourage the Party Of Hate to keep going with their segregationist platform. This will allow Republicans to win every election for the foreseeable future. Do you think the audience was being racist? What would your reaction be if Obama was booed while sitting in the audience?

KKK members must be opened minded, since they voted for Obama twice. Looks like Obama was the KKK's previous party of choice. Hillary was such a bad candidate even they disavowed her.

Did you read the article? It debunked a Leftist propaganda lie. It should have been apparent when the caption states that Republicans are blaming food stamps for the debt. Not one Republican believes that asinine statement. Seems Liberals will believe anything for that to be circulating.

That's because you are a biased political hack. Do you expect him to appoint loony Liberals?

I'm going with the guy that spent over 30 years working closely with government officials versus a man who's only experience is being a community agitator and collecting a paycheck for doing nothing in the Senate. Simple!

I posted he served "around a year". Thanks for verifying my correct statement. Since this is a college football Saturday, I think the expression is "The ruling on the field is confirmed." And how does time served voting present in nearly every vote equate to presidential experience?

This illustrates your problem. You only hear what you want to hear. NPR: [Hidden Content] New York Post: [Hidden Content] CBS News: [Hidden Content] CNN: [Hidden Content] Do you need more links?

No he didn't. He said he would keep some parts of it. If you believe what you wrote, provide a link.

So in your mind sending out a tweet takes too much of his precious time, even though he hasn't assumed office. Let's compare the time it takes to send out a tweet versus playing a round of golf. Shouldn't Obama spend less time on the golf course and spend more time tending to the country's business? What insightful knowledge do you possess that leads you to believe he isn't prepared? Do you know how many government contracts he's been awarded? He's been working with the government for over 30 years. I will take that experience over a community agitator any day. And do you really think that a person is mentally unstable because they send out tweets? You stated earlier that you wouldn't want a mechanic performing heart surgery. In the same vein, why do you feel the need to try and analyze a person's mental state? Shouldn't you leave that to a psychologist? Sounds like you are a prime example of your own analogy. And I predict, based on many examples in recent history, that you will not answer these questions. Embarrassing!

I've refuted every post you've wrote...and you run and hide then show up later on a different thread. Like I said, embarrassing.

Yes it should if Trump repeals it. But he's also pledged to replace it. And I have zero faith in this replacement plan significantly dropping the cost. It's usually a safe bet to follow the mantra "when government gets involved, costs will rise and quality will fall".

The previous time I heard that promise the costs skyrocketed. I wonder if Trump will follow the previous administration's lead and give incomplete and falsified data to the Congressional Budget Office so they can give a highly inaccurate fiscal estimate.

Maybe the doctor should drop your pants, smack you on the behind and say "Suck it up, Buttercup!" Your hypocritical whining is just proof positive of your true colors already on full display in this forum.

How are you not embarrassed when writing crap like this?

You are not very good at deflection.

You failed to comprehend the breath and scope of my post. How is it that organizations such as Mother Jones, Politico, Huffington Post can always, and I mean always, find "evidence" of racism (reality makes no difference) on every Republican candidate but can't find one example of a racist Democrat...these same Democrats comprised mostly of White men who by their own admission must be racist based on their skin color? You don't find that odd? Or extremely biased?

Some of us knew all along that Bush and Romney were not the devil the Left wing media made them out to be. Maybe this will open your eyes to the effects of the Left wing propaganda machine. I won't hold my breath. But it is apparent that you've been brainwashed to believe Trump is an idiot. Please enlighten us as to why you believe that a man that has grown a company into a 9 billion dollar empire is mentally deficient. And I notice you keep referencing Trump's lack of experience, but you voted for a man that's only political experience was serving around a year in the Senate (voting present in every opportunity)? What in your mind makes Obama's limited experience as a community organizer and freshman Senator so superior to Trump's senior experience in building a multinational multibillion dollar empire?

Why would any reasonable person answer any question you spit out when you won't answer a single question posed to you? I'm going to go out on a limb and predict you won't answer this question.

Really? Just four years ago he was too rich to have any inkling of the plight of the common man. He was practically the devil for pointing out that 47% of eligible taxpayers pay no taxes. He was the ultimate misogynist for stating that he had a binder that contained a list of competent women. In your eyes, did he flip-flop or evolve?

I'm with you. And if you want to be a gentlemen, you're in the wrong forum. It can get nasty in here, though not as bad as the High School and college threads. LOL.

Do you find it curious that: The Left believes the majority of whites are racist. And it is fact that the majority of the Democrats are white. But MotherJones, Politico, Huffington Post and the other Left wing websites have not found one racist that has a "D" behind their name? That defies statistical probability. But it does emphatically illustrate their propaganda infesting your brain.