Englebert

I'm curious as to whether nappyroots will attribute Trump's position as flip-flopping or evolving. Since he feels the "R" and "D" are blurred in this case, he might have trouble figuring which attribute to label Trump. He might have to actually think for once. On second thought, nah...he will just wait for the Liberal leaders to tell him which way to think.

Wow, that's from before Clinton and Obama were staunchly against gay marriage.

Huffington Post espouses their full-blown spin and distortion as their Liberal sheeple eat up the lies like candy. Halloween Part 2 for the easily manipulated. Why don't you find the same story on a respectable news outlet and read what is really going on. I know that is an unfathomable task for you. For some reason you seem content with just shining the boots of your Liberal spin masters.

Does anybody on this planet give a flying flip about what Seth Meyers has to say?

Material will be less than what was available from the last 8 years, but the comedians will now be allowed to comment on it without being labelled racist.

That article is hilarious. The first paragraph says that the U.S. was a laughingstock in 2008. Everyone knows we didn't become a laughingstock until after Obama assumed office, started implementing his failed policies and went on his apology tour. One of the first "accomplishments" states that he appointed an IT CIO to oversee spending and efficiency. It seems the author omitted the fact that this chief oversaw the failed rollout of the Obamacare website, which by the way, crashed on rollout, cost the American taxpayers 2 billion dollars and still rising, was developed by a Canadian based company who's senior vice-president went to school and is friends with Michelle Obama, gathers and stores American citizens personal information but fails to employ adequate security...I could go on for days, but the author thinks this is an "accomplishment". I had to stop right there. Did you actually read this list of "accomplishments"? And if so, I am very curious as to why you felt the need to post a link. Are you as embarrassed for the author as I am? Bless his little heart. At least he tried. Failed miserably, but a least he tried. Let's all joined together and see if we can get him a participation trophy. [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content]

So you believe some people are elitist and above the law. That is shameful. And I dare you to find anyone on here that would say Dick Cheney should not be held accountable if he committed unlawful acts. Your attempt at moral equivalency is pathetic at best. And our president elect has also said (many times) he wants to lock her up. It's odd how you can hear a never-ending flip-flop but only hear to point you want to hear. That ability must be a side effect of Liberal Disease Syndrome.

Uh-oh, looks like someone else has a man-crush on Hannity and Rush. Do you have their posters on your ceiling like new tobie?

Clap.

I'm curious, if hell freezes over and they do carve Obama's face into Mount Rushmore, what color would his face be?

How do you feel? Should she be locked up if found that she indeed commit unlawful acts, just as others have been locked up? I'm very curious to know if you think the rule of law should apply to everyone or if you will continue to bow and obey your party leaders wishes. Please enlighten us. It is a very, very simple question and no need for your usual avoidance.

And this is why your party got kicked to the curb. They are as delusional as you.

You hit the nail on the head, except you aimed it at the wrong party. If the Democrat leaders would stop calling the non-protected people racist, misogynist, bigots, homophones, xenophobes, deplorables, etc., etc., etc. and stop accepting hate groups into their party...the groups that display the most vile imaginable whenever someone doesn't bow and conform to their warped way of thinking. Most non-minorities are sick of the constant unfounded accusations, especially from the likes of hate-filled Liberals. It's ironic and pathetic that the Party Of Hate spews copious amounts of vitriol at non-minorities for racial stereotyping, but are the ones guilty of placing their little labels on everyone imaginable. What a sad and deeply depressing shock it is to those who eventually come to the realization that the party they thought was so righteous is guilty of everything they preach against. The others will just continue to live in denial.

I'm showing 11 [11 man] programs besides WOS. Which ones did I get wrong? Amarillo (27: 1933-1935, 27:1935-1937) Bremond (29: 1981-1982, 31:2014-2015) Celina (68: 1998-2002, 31: 2005-2006) Crawford (24: 1961-1963, 29: 2004-2005) Euless Trinity (27: 2007-2008, 28: 2009-2010) Katy (4) (27: 1958-1960, 32: 1997-1999, 24: 2003-2004, 31: 2012-2013) Lake Travis (48: 2007-2010, 25: 2010-2012) Mart (26: 1968-1970, 30: 1999-2000) Southlake Carroll (4) (28: 1988-1989; 33: 1992-1994, 31: 2002-2003, 49: 2004-2007) Stephenville (32: 1993-1994, 26: 1998-1999) Tyler (26: 1972-1974, 27: 1994-1995) West Orange-Stark (24: 1986-1988, 23: 2015-Present)

I think Fort Hancock is one. And I think Amarillo is another. [Just saw someone else posted this one.]

I'm out of likes. And many, even some on this board, will still believe Obama received far more criticism and was the target of hate more that Trump.

If you could comprehend you would realize that nobody on this board ignored anything. In fact, the consensus on this board was that he was the second worse candidate in history, but was blessed by running against the worst candidate in history. The Liberals have no one to blame but themselves, but keeping in form, Liberals always resort to pointing the finger at someone else. Your post isn't worth the usual courtesy clap. Try and put a little more thought into the next one.

Because he has to work with Congress to repeal it. Read a little bit some time. Ooops, I forgot. Clap.

Clap.

You can't post them all day. You can find one every now and again but ignore the ones that don't fit your narrative. That's considered lying by omission. Do you realize that you've posted so many falsehoods on this board that most can agree that whatever you post can safely be considered false before reading. I'm curious as to why you still post. You've been called out so many times to which a normal person would be embarrassed beyond comprehension. But you continue to persevere. I keep thinking of a poor comic on stage in which every joke fails but keeps delivering them to the end. At some point you just have to feel bad for him and give him the "bless his little heart" courtesy clap. Clap.

I couldn't get through the bile of the first paragraph. That author is an embarrassment to himself and our country. Do you actually believe this crap or did you post the link for entertainment purposes?

We condemned the practice and put a stop to it. What have you done?

Has anyone denied that these measures were not beneficial? Has anyone, and I mean anyone (including this upcoming administration) proposed allowing refineries to resume emitting known poisonous and harmful pollutants? Please show proof of your contentions. I am willing to bet you have no proof and you are just employing your usual strategy of stereotyping. And if scientists declared that the carbon dioxide emitting from your mouth is harmful to the environment would you stop breathing?

Yeah, you may be right about the point being to show the effects. I have seen many, many videos, pictures and illustrations showing similar things. I guess I'm just jaded because I constantly see stuff like this with the caption "Look what man is doing to our precious earth" and when asked to show where man is the cause the response is always "Well you are just a low-down denier". I'm not sure what you mean about if "it" exists. If by "it" you mean global warming, many, many studies have shown no "significant" warming has occurred or is occurring. I don't know of anyone that doesn't believe the climate changes. My stance on warming is "I have no idea". I do know the raw data used has been altered, skewed and manipulated. I do know that we have very little reliable data from 50+ years ago and that many climatologists infer lots of data with highly sketchy reasons. I do know that every single model these experts have developed and use have been wildly inaccurate. (Not most...all) I do know that many people claim the debate is over, which flies in the face and is completely contrary to scientific standards. I'm all for the continued research, but I'm totally against changing our way of life and disrupting our economy (except for common sense pollution reduction) when cause cannot be established, therefore governmental proposed "solutions" cannot be determined in any stretch of the imagination to be beneficial or actually harmful.

I finally watched the video in it's entirety and I have to admit I was shocked. Shocked that HBO spent untold amounts of money on a film that had to use poor ol' crazy Uncle Joe Biden to try and prove a scientific point...a point that it didn't attempt to give a cause. I guess the film maker decided not to attempt specific predictions because every time the Man-Made Global Warmers do this they end up with egg on their face when every single one of their prediction models prove to be wildly inaccurate. HBO spent a lot of money in stating "the climate changes". Captain Obvious would be proud. I'm also shocked that they chose to leave out the linkage of man to global warming, other than a few one-liners saying "man is the cause". I'm sure if Man-Made Global Warming theorists had any shred of empirical evidence of man's central role in earth's changing climate than those shining nuggets would have been included. Why would anyone leave out key information. If we ever go into another full scale war, the U.S. needs to hire some of these people for the Department of Propoganda Administration.