Reagan

U.S. Trade Deficit Falls Sharply, Down 57.6 Percent From a Year Earlier! [Hidden Content]

Cornyn’s press strategy for the past decade has been: 1. Democrats become outraged at something Trump does! 2. Cornyn runs to MSNBC or CNN to criticize Trump for that thing! Now Cornyn’s actually having to answer questions about HIS record, and it’s a total dumpster fire.

Just a little detour, my friend!

I can see Trump not endorsing anyone after seeing this poll that shows Paxton winning! I’m fairly confident this is the win Trump wants!

With or without Trump’s endorsement Paxton still leads. It’s all about the end result, my friend! [Hidden Content]

As I see it, Cornyn lost when he barely beat Paxton in the primary. Historically speaking, when this happens the incumbent usually loses the run-off! I know you’re hoping Cornyn wins so don’t be too disappointed when he doesn’t! 😏

I believe Trump said it’s a hoax that he’s involved in it.

Oh, I understand the cleaning up part. I am never part of any personal attacks. Like I said, I go by the rules. I just had a little problem with the @ situation. Don’t think it was hurting anybody. But that’s my thought.

You see, we can have a civil conversation!

Let’s not let it come into play by keeping personal feelings out of it!

Trust me, harassment by a moderator is NOT something he wants to deal with.

Ok, this sounds like taking care of anyone who breaks any rules. What you have here if a moderator don’t like something personally but no rules are broken then they can arbitrarily tell someone they can’t do something. Again no rules were broken. The problem is what else may come up in the future when one moderator gets his feelings hurt and says “you can’t do that!” Again no rules are broken just a moderator getting their feelings hurt. You know it could happen. Nothing that went on was inappropriate. I will argue the point because I don’t break the rules. But I will say this — if anyone feels they are being harassed or singled out by any moderator then take it straight to the owner of the site!

You wanna know cultish behavior check out the followers of the Democratic party. They were ga ga over Biden. Then the powers that be held a coup against Biden then the same followers turned 90 degrees toward Kamalina. They did what the party told them they were gonna do. Like I said, cultish behavior!

If one has that kind of record for that long and you haven’t won a State title then is something wrong. If State titles were easy every coach would have 30 of them. But it’s NOT easy. That’s what distinguishes elite coaches from everyone else. You got to ask yourself: why does Surratt have so many State titles and Danaher has none? Luck? I think not. You might actually think that there might a difference in coaching ability concerning Surratt and Danaher? My opinion is there is a difference! Don’t get me wrong, Danaher was a great coach. I’m sure he ran a respectable program. Honest question: Out of the two coaches mentioned, if you had to hire a coach, which one would you hire and why?

Did you turn your head when you coughed? LOL!!

Who’s calling anyone out with the @ symbol? It’s calling attention to something that is being discussed may be an interest to certain people. They can either read it or ignore it. When my attention is requested I usually read it. It has been established that no rules were broken!

It still says you can’t receive messages. 🤷‍♂️

Hey, you can’t receive messages?

From different sources. I posted quite a few.

Ok, so no rule was broken. Thanks for being honest!

So, no one has the ability to use it? I’ll need an answer about what rule was broken!

Are they available or not?

By an incumbent barely winning a primary, he’s already lost the run-off. And Paxton will beat Talirico. The more I learn about Talirico the more creepy it gets!

Who edited my post? @ is available to use. What rule was broken? Or is it not available anymore?

Was this quick enough for you?! Edited No more @