Jump to content

Reagan

Members
  • Posts

    14,866
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Reagan

  1. Let’s not let it come into play by keeping personal feelings out of it!
  2. Trust me, harassment by a moderator is NOT something he wants to deal with.
  3. Ok, this sounds like taking care of anyone who breaks any rules. What you have here if a moderator don’t like something personally but no rules are broken then they can arbitrarily tell someone they can’t do something. Again no rules were broken. The problem is what else may come up in the future when one moderator gets his feelings hurt and says “you can’t do that!” Again no rules are broken just a moderator getting their feelings hurt. You know it could happen. Nothing that went on was inappropriate. I will argue the point because I don’t break the rules. But I will say this — if anyone feels they are being harassed or singled out by any moderator then take it straight to the owner of the site!
  4. You wanna know cultish behavior check out the followers of the Democratic party. They were ga ga over Biden. Then the powers that be held a coup against Biden then the same followers turned 90 degrees toward Kamalina. They did what the party told them they were gonna do. Like I said, cultish behavior!
  5. If one has that kind of record for that long and you haven’t won a State title then is something wrong. If State titles were easy every coach would have 30 of them. But it’s NOT easy. That’s what distinguishes elite coaches from everyone else. You got to ask yourself: why does Surratt have so many State titles and Danaher has none? Luck? I think not. You might actually think that there might a difference in coaching ability concerning Surratt and Danaher? My opinion is there is a difference! Don’t get me wrong, Danaher was a great coach. I’m sure he ran a respectable program. Honest question: Out of the two coaches mentioned, if you had to hire a coach, which one would you hire and why?
  6. Did you turn your head when you coughed? LOL!!
  7. Who’s calling anyone out with the @ symbol? It’s calling attention to something that is being discussed may be an interest to certain people. They can either read it or ignore it. When my attention is requested I usually read it. It has been established that no rules were broken!
  8. It still says you can’t receive messages. 🤷‍♂️
  9. Hey, you can’t receive messages?
  10. From different sources. I posted quite a few.
  11. Ok, so no rule was broken. Thanks for being honest!
  12. So, no one has the ability to use it? I’ll need an answer about what rule was broken!
  13. By an incumbent barely winning a primary, he’s already lost the run-off. And Paxton will beat Talirico. The more I learn about Talirico the more creepy it gets!
  14. Who edited my post? @ is available to use. What rule was broken? Or is it not available anymore?
  15. Was this quick enough for you?! Edited No more @
  16. This is fairly spot on. Like i said before -- Cornyn lost the run-off when he barely won the primary. Usually bad for incumbents when this happens!
  17. I like it!!
  18. The SPR? I’ll have to look when he did it. Was it before any elections? 🤷‍♂️ You know he tried, well maybe not him, to drive us towards EV’s by driving the cost of gas up.
  19. Trump Weighing Special Ops Raid to Secure Iran’s Enriched Uranium Stockpile! Good for the world or bad? [Hidden Content]
  20. This is one of many reason this snake needs to go!!
  21. ^^^^This^^^^
×
×
  • Create New...