Reagan

Blather perhaps -- Mindless blather perhaps not! (Grin)

Tulsi Gabbard Confirms She Has Officially Referred Barack Obama to the DOJ for CRIMINAL Prosecution! [Hidden Content]

This is what conservatism looks like! [Hidden Content]

@Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker @DCT @Boyz N Da Hood Thoughts?!

“I Hope Obama Is Practicing His Mugshot Because Trump Set the Bar High” – Christina Bobb Joins Wayne Allyn Root to Talk the Deep State in Crisis Following Tulsi’s Document Drop! [Hidden Content]

DoJ Asks Ghislaine Maxwell to Meet With Them. This should be interesting! [Hidden Content]

Excellent!

Interesting!

I wonder how many people through the years who never gave the name Redskins a thought are now outraged because someone told them to be? And BTW -- what's wrong with calling Indians Indians?

Obama says he can’t be tried for treason because he wasn’t born in America! 🤣 [Hidden Content]

Good one!

Obama’s Real Legacy Comes into Focus. From the article: "Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard set off fireworks on Friday when she accused former president Barack Obama of organizing a coup d’état against his successor. Summarizing the damning evidence in her possession, Gabbard concluded, “These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House to subvert the will of the American people.” Treason is a capital offense with no statute of limitations. So consider how explosive Gabbard’s allegations are. The senior official in charge of all American Intelligence is stating unequivocally that Obama and his loyal subordinates sabotaged the peaceful transfer of presidential power in 2016, betrayed the American people, and made war against the legitimate government of the United States. Gabbard just dropped the “Mother of All Bombs” on Obama’s White House syndicate, the Intelligence Community, and the globalist Deep State." [Hidden Content]

GENERAL MIKE FLYNN: Obama knew Trump won and immediately moved to sabotage him.

"Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution defines treason against the United States as either levying war against them or giving aid and comfort to their enemies. It also states that a person can only be convicted of treason based on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court, and Congress has the power to declare the punishment for treason." This levying war, not only war but the courts have used rebellion also, could be with bullets are actions taken by individuals against the US (rebellion) through subterfuge. I would think that what obama and his cronies did to sabotage a Presidency and have attempted coup against a sitting President could possibly defined an act of war. I did a little research. Examples: Based on available records, treason convictions in the U.S. have almost always occurred during or in connection with recognized wars or rebellions that courts treated as equivalent to "levying war." For example: Whiskey Rebellion (1794): Two individuals, John Mitchell and Philip Weigel, were convicted of treason for their roles in an armed uprising against federal tax collection in Pennsylvania. This was not a war with a foreign enemy but an internal rebellion, interpreted as "levying war" against the United States. Both were pardoned by President George Washington. Aaron Burr’s Conspiracy (1807): Burr was tried for treason for allegedly plotting to seize territory and form a separate nation. The Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John Marshall, acquitted Burr, ruling that conspiracy alone did not constitute "levying war" unless there was an actual assemblage of armed forces. This case, though not resulting in a conviction, occurred outside a formal war and clarified that treason requires overt acts, not just planning. Shays’ Rebellion (1786-1787): John Bly and Charles Rose were convicted of treason and hanged for participating in an armed uprising in Massachusetts against state authorities. This was prosecuted under state law, not federal, and occurred before the U.S. Constitution was ratified, but it was considered "levying war" against the state. Thomas Dorr (1844): Dorr was convicted of treason against Rhode Island for leading an armed attempt to overthrow the state government during the Dorr Rebellion, a non-war context involving a dispute over suffrage. He was sentenced to life in prison. John Brown (1859): Brown was convicted of treason against Virginia for his raid on Harpers Ferry, an attempt to incite a slave rebellion. This was prosecuted under state law and occurred in a non-war context, though it was treated as "levying war" against the state. While state-level convictions like those of Dorr and Brown occurred in non-war contexts (rebellions treated as "levying war" against the state), federal treason convictions have consistently been tied to wartime or rebellion scenarios. So, yes, either treason or sedition can be used concerning obama and others.

Never knew one can be prosecuted for treason for stating an opinion! Fascinating! BTW -- Trump was right about the 2020 election being rigged. But, I think it all worked out. JoeBama and his DEI VP damaged the Dem party for years to come!

No doubt a President does have some immunity. But -- treason is not one of them! Tulsi has the receipts!

This is gonna get interesting! Tulsi has the receipts! [Hidden Content] @Big girl @CardinalBacker @UT alum @DCT @Boyz N Da Hood No one is above the law!

So, when is the "affordable" part of the Affordable Care Act going to take place?!

I'm not totally on board with that thought. But, what's ironic, is when Tragichippy stated the opinion that this may be a Trump ploy, I have run across this thought a few times on the internet. Knowing Trump it's not inconceivable that he would do this. But I do know with 100% certitude that you and I don't know. Only Trump knows! But, knowing how Dems do everything opposite of Trump, in rabid style, and Trump knows it, I could possibly see this ploy could have happened!