DannyShapiroBE

2 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

This article is in negative light and to post it to a sports forum.  Smh.  Non of those kids play on this year's Stang team.  Just seems that you (and your boss ) have a short history of posting and publishing things in a negative light.  I'm just glad that you're man enough to talk about this incident openly...

Because it involves former SETX athletes, yeah, I saw no problem posting it to that forum. Not my website, so I have no issue with it being moved.

And not all news is going to be positive. I know that, you know that. But news is news, whether you like it or not.

As always, comments, questions, concerns welcomed.

5 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

The article from a few weeks ago (one that YOU published)?  I DON'T think it was the same article from the others.  

I'm not talking about that one. I'm talking about the WO-S one.

3 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Agreed.  This seems so familiar.  I've seen an article like this from a particular Beaumont Enterprise editor a few weeks back with negative intent.  

Anyway....

It's moved.  

For reporting the news? The same news reported by KFDM and KBMT? OK.

8 minutes ago, ST413 said:

I am not going to get into the incident but have a question.  Why is Thompson redshirted?  Is it injury related?

He was a redshirt his first year, in 2015.

17 hours ago, WOSgrad said:

I contacted Ronald Jackson yesterday morning to get the numbers for Central, Ozen and West Brook.  I did not hear back.

West Brook is 2432 per Coach Peevey.

Vidor QB Fawcett was 3-for-3, 92 yards (completions of 40, 32 and 20 yards)

RB Stogner 184 yards, 3 TDs.

Vidor rushed for 432 yards.

Oh and Silsbee looked good the final three quarters. Such an up and down team but when they're on, they're real good. Defense played well after two huge breakdowns early.

Really feel for Bridge City and its injuries. Not sure any team's had it worse than them this year.

7 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Thanks for posting.

Postgame interview w/ Christopher Martin: 

Had one with Kalon too but no idea where it went...

5 minutes ago, AshlyVYPE said:

Not according to one of their coaches.

Heard the same thing as Ashly. Don't think this is happening. 

6 minutes ago, Footballfan1209 said:

I see Lumberton is moving down, that will be a  good move for them.

They will be very close.

2 hours ago, Tj yellow jacket said:

I guess that will put PAM back to 6A?

Last year's enrollment Updated ones are coming in today of course.

Vidor @ 1278 plus about 40 at an alternative campus. Number will come out roughly at 1320.

I put together high school enrollment numbers from last year for all the teams in my coverage area.

Tomorrow will be interesting...looking forward to it.

5 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Newton, with a bustling enrollment of 289 has played (and beaten by more than 20 points): Silsbee (enrollment: 813), Diboll  (enrollment: 513), Bridge City (enrollment: 763) and East Chambers (enrollment: 416).

Newton, WO-S and PN-G have all had impressive seasons. Ranking them 1 to 3 has been difficult, honestly. Wouldn't lose sleep over making any of those teams No. 1.

18 minutes ago, REBgp said:

Not sure the 'offers' are accurate.  I know one young man on that list who shows no offers.  To the best of my knowledge, he's gotten two offers, albeit not from any big schools.  Personally, I can't believe Lamar hasn't shown any interest in this young man, but I'm no college scout or coach.  Based on what I know, I suspect many others may have offers from small or private colleges.

Exactly. Especially with small schools, I have to rely on players to keep me updated, especially if they don't tweet them out.

4 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I consider a loss a loss.  A 7 point loss = a 40 point loss.  That that gets no consideration when evaluating things from where I stand.  

Strange that you actually and asking for my feedback and responding THIS time instead of ignoring....

Fair, but I was at that game and West Brook didn't look good at all. Honestly shocked me.

1 hour ago, Stattrax said:

It's all about how the person making the poll perceives the whole idea. That's the problem with only one person. It's his opinion... Take the Setx poll. I have PNG ranked #4. Behind Woodlands, Lufkin, Crosby. My thinking is PNG can't beat #1 and 2, and Crosby gets the nod over them because they are putting up video game numbers. However, the poll reads PNG is #2. I can respect that because it's comprised of several knowledgeable pollsters, not just one guys opinion. I applaud this guy for trying, and honestly without voters, it is what it is. his opinion. I respect it, but might disagree. I do think it's better than last week. WB is hard because of the losses. 

Pretty much. Thanks for understanding.

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Incorrect.  I'm just saying the teams that bear WB would be considered a top tier and a high end middle tier team.  Had WB had lost to College Park or someone like that, then heck yea, drop them.  

West Brook was an untimed down away from losing 50-0 at home. Whether it's one bad game or not, that's a bad loss, especially at home. Coach Peevey: "Once things started going bad for us, we couldn't stop it. We need to get back to playing Bruin football."

By our other sportswriter, Matt Faye.

4 minutes ago, Jag Insider said:

I'm not a Bruin fan but because of back to back losses, they are out of your poll?

Correct.

Enterprise's top 10 teams for week 9.

As always, feel free to comment. Thanks.

Bridge City's Max Baker is already out of the hospital after taking a bad hit in last night's LC-M game.

Great news.

Correct. That was my mistake.