Yeoj

Dude is full of more ish than a Thanksgiving turkey!

Again, this is the current staff at WB's third season. Just three seasons ago WB competed every year and made the playoffs! You keep throwing all these abstract reasons like they're facts but are really just your attempt to sound smarter than everyone else. So is it the mystical equipment, facilities, resources, or is it the culture of the city, schools, and COVID. I didn't realize that COVID only affected Beaumont and their schools. LMAO... Dude you're either on one of those losing coaching staffs or you're a guy that has another screen name and are trying to use this one to cosign on your opinion. 

So, you're saying Atascocita and North Shore has special equipment, facilities, and resources that make kids better football players, and Beaumont doesn't have the resources to get this equipment and facilities. So why don't other schools in those districts like Humble, Kingwood, Kingwood Park, and Galena Park have that magical equipment and facilities? Its the exact same resources! And why does these magical athlete creating machines and facilities only work with football players? Beaumont has no problem competing in basketball. Three years ago, WB football was a third round playoff team. Five years ago, WB football competed for the state championship. So did this magical equipment, facilities, and resource come into existence after that? Or maybe BISD hired the wrong coach to lead their programs. Just maybe our athletic director sucks at his jobs and keeps hiring dudes he knows and that's killing the Beaumont programs. What if parents are sending their talented kids that would be playing for WB and United to surrounding area schools cause they don't like how the coach runs his program. Why is your big facts and big truth is only accurate for Beaumont? Port Arthur has very similar facilities and resources to Beaumont and their team is doing quite well. What about Silsbee, Hampshire Fannett, or PNG? Maybe I'm missing something, can you make it make more sense?

So, you're saying Atascocita and North Shore has special equipment, facilities, and resources that make kids better football players, and Beaumont doesn't have the resources to get this equipment and facilities. So why don't other schools in those districts like Humble, Kingwood, Kingwood Park, and Galena Park have that magical equipment and facilities? Its the exact same resources! And why does these magical athlete creating machines and facilities only work with football players? Beaumont has no problem competing in basketball. Three years ago, WB football was a third round playoff team. Five years ago, WB football competed for the state championship. So did this magical equipment, facilities, and resource come into existence after that? Or maybe BISD hired the wrong coach to lead their programs. Just maybe our athletic director sucks at his jobs and keeps hiring dudes he knows and that's killing the Beaumont programs. What if parents are sending their talented kids that would be playing for WB and United to surrounding area schools cause they don't like how the coach runs his program. Why is your big facts and big truth is only accurate for Beaumont? Port Arthur has very similar facilities and resources to Beaumont and their team is doing quite well. What about Silsbee, Hampshire Fannett, or PNG? Maybe I'm missing something, can you make it make more sense?

If WB sweeps BU in basketball Soulja gonna email everyone at the Administration Bldg. 

What's laughable is you probably can't name 3 starters for West Brook and can't name 3 players coming off United or Silsbee's bench but you're on here crying about a made-up preseason poll. LMAO...

What's laughable is you probably can't name 3 starters for West Brook and can't name 3 players coming off United or Silsbee's bench but you're on here crying about a made-up preseason poll. LMAO...

Were they hired to be good men or football coaches? The fact that they are good men is not in question. Their ability to lead young men to win football games is. They absolutely suck at it, evidenced by the lack of the team's ability to even make games competitive. Can we find a person that's good and has the ability to actually lead a program to win football games!

Were they hired to be good men or football coaches? The fact that they are good men is not in question. Their ability to lead young men to win football games is. They absolutely suck at it, evidenced by the lack of the team's ability to even make games competitive. Can we find a person that's good and has the ability to actually lead a program to win football games!

Were they hired to be good men or football coaches? The fact that they are good men is not in question. Their ability to lead young men to win football games is. They absolutely suck at it, evidenced by the lack of the team's ability to even make games competitive. Can we find a person that's good and has the ability to actually lead a program to win football games!

It seems to me those bmt skill positions in the past have now decided to go to HF… 

Man the Derek Carr that played for Clements wasn't the QB he is today. Didn't he move to California before his senior year and then he took off? I actually went to that game in the cold and rain and watch Stump trick off the win. WB led that game until a little over a minute left. It was some very questionable calls by the coach that cost WB that game. That Dickerson team didn't have the Lamarque kids on it that the Dickerson North Shore has been playing has. WB was clearly the better team in that game and Stump got in his own way again. As far as the Cy-Falls team, WB was better than them on both sides the ball, hell sports mags had the Bruins as the dark horses to make out the region that year. Dude underachieves as the head coach given the talent at his disposal.
As for Peevy he made it to the holy grail of TX high school football, the state championship game. Stump can't even make it out the region. So if we use your logic, doesn't that make him the better coach? Peevy has a state runner-up trophy on his resume, Stump doesn't.

All the teams I made bold, Stump's WB teams had equal or better talent than. Stump had future pros on those team as well.  Christine Micheal and Ryan Grant were on the team that lost to Dickerson. Hell Peevy accomplished more at WB with less. My opinion might be strong as calling him not good, but he definitely underachieved with the talent he had at WB. Plus, the Atascocita fanbase is starting the have those same sentiments. 

All the teams I made bold, Stump's WB teams had equal or better talent than. Stump had future pros on those team as well.  Christine Micheal and Ryan Grant were on the team that lost to Dickerson. Hell Peevy accomplished more at WB with less. My opinion might be strong as calling him not good, but he definitely underachieved with the talent he had at WB. Plus, the Atascocita fanbase is starting the have those same sentiments. 

You have a point, but Stump has loss games where his team was equal or was only slightly better than their opponent. Look at all those loaded WB teams he coached and couldn't make it pass the 3rd round. All those years at WB with the bulk of the Beaumont talent and he won district once and never made it out of the region.

Yeah he's not all that. He only wins when his team is clearly better than their opponents. 

Yeah he's not all that. He only wins when his team is clearly better than their opponents. 

Yeah he's not all that. He only wins when his team is clearly better than their opponents. 

The year before his hire the Bruins made it to the second round of the playoffs. Dude went 5-5, 1-9, and hasn't won a game this season.

West Brook has taken down several schools with much higher enrollment. That's never been an excuse until recently.
 
 
It's all about having the right coach. Stump, Peavey and even Flanagan put together playoff teams with no issue. 
Nobody had more obstacles than Coach Durley and he brought home a championship.
 

SMDH...

!!:42/34/4


You've alerted the ScoreboardBot:

Score Alert: Humble Atascocita(42) @ Katy(34) Q4

!!:42/27/4


You've alerted the ScoreboardBot:

Score Alert: Humble Atascocita(42) @ Katy(27) Q4

!!:35/27/4


You've alerted the ScoreboardBot:

Score Alert: Humble Atascocita(35) @ Katy(27) Q4

!!:35/21/4


You've alerted the ScoreboardBot:

Score Alert: Humble Atascocita(35) @ Katy(21) Q4