EnlightenedMessiah

Um, no. I very clearly said the consumer gets the shaft either way. I don't want government involvement OR ISPs charging an arm and a leg.

So your opinion is the fed gov MUST step in or the big bad ISPs are going to screw everyone over if they aren't kept in check.
 
You are saying the fed gov is the answer to this problem (not really a problem) right?

Still waiting for ONE conservative poster here to explain net neutrality. No, you may not use a lifeline and ring up Bamakid or TVC to do your research for you.

So.....just because ONE person is not familiar with the issue, you then ASSume that most people aren't familiar with it.......not very logical.......
 

25 posts in this topic and not one conservative has explained to me what net neutrality means.

Stick to the "Obama bad, conservatives good" talking point because you low informations voters obviously are unable to form your own opinions. My opinion is post #6 in this topic.

Usual deflection?

Not a single conservative in this topic has explained to me what net neutrality means! How can you say you don't see the merits when you don't even understand the issue?

Lumraiderfan has confirmed his status as a low information voter, congrats!

Read back where I said anything about it one way or another...I didn't.
 
You jumped in to bash the article so why don't you explain why instead of your usual deflection.
 
Or Buddy Garrity, since you like the comment he made and must agree with it, you explain why this is a good thing for the internet since he won't.

Can you explain what it is first? Surely if you don't like it then you must have an understanding of what it means.. Right? Oh wait. Obama bad, conservatives smart. I forgot.

Smitty posted an article that you two want to bash but rather than bash the article and why we conservatives don't understand it, try explaining the merits in net neutrality that you obviously see that we don't.

This forum must have the 10% of low information voting conservatives who don't know what it is then, because I've yet to see someone explain it to me.

All I see is the usual "Obama bad, conservatives smart" lines repeated over and over.

99% of Conservatives reading the article already KNOW what net neutrality is and disagree with it wholeheartedly........the only inaccuracy in the thread's title is that "obama" should be changed to "out of control federal tyrants".......He's not doing this alone.........:)

In other words you have no idea what it is, typical.

You are the definition of a low information voter.

Consumer is screwed either way here.

Government gets involved or telecom companies start raising prices, throttling Internet speeds, slicing and dicing different websites/services into additional costs, etc.

Smitty,

Can you explain to me what net neutrality means?

Thanks

GOP would never back Trump, he'd get crushed in the general

You know it

Back to your billions.

Did you seriously just make this comparison? Wow.

PIcking and choosing what one believes?  Sounds like moral liberal/fiscal conservative to me.

The issue with you believers is that you conveniently pick and choose what parts to ignore and what to believe. You either beleive ALL or NONE. It's supposed to be the word of Christ right?

"This makes for a very difficult debate with non believers."  Mat, you are 100% correct!  Now, with that being said, I would invite anyone here who professes to be a non-believer to give the Bible a try.  Read it and then decide for yourself.

I just go one more percent.

Think about it..

This guy might be worse than smitty

In other words you can't answer my questions. Just admit you haven't even read the book that you worship so much

I refer you to Matthew 7:8

You're the believer. Can you not answer those questions?

Read it and find out......

Your lame article didn't prove anything

Someone who denies the accuracy of MATHEMATICS should be careful about calling anyone else's logic "stupid"......

Do you not understand how stupid this logic is?

The Flying Spaghetti Monster is real. I know it's real because it says so on this piece of paper. If it says so on this piece of paper then it must be true.

Giants did also.  It says so in the Bible.

Also, approximately how old is the earth? Did dinosaurs ever exist?

Wait, the New Testament took over in 30 AD or that's when the old book was written? And where does Jesus fit in during the drafting process? What was wrong with the old book? They just changed books for the hell of it? How does one get invited to the group of dudes to write these books?

The New Testament took over AS PROPHESIED by Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Joel among others, on the Day of Pentecost in AD 30.....this new book was written by Paul, Peter, John, and Luke among others with the Divine guidance of the Holy Spirit......that explanation is meant for others who read this....thanks for the opportunity to teach the Word possibly to someone who wants to learn it.......you, though, and people with your attitude are mentioned in Matthew 7: 8......

Yup, really tired of the PC nonsense.

All races aren't equal.
Men and women aren't equal.

We're all different, and that's ok..

Should not be surprising since it all boils down to race.

Wait, so is the Old Testament is no longer applicable? I thought it was the word of Christ? What date did this new book take over? Who wrote this new book?

The Sabbath was Saturday, NOT Sunday.....:P....Christians are not under the Old Testament laws anymore......the Old Testament was nailed to the cross and a new covenant was brought forth with Christ........I refer you to the book of Hebrews......

What about the killing people who work on Sunday's part?

Oh wait, you conveniently decide to ignore that section. And all other sections regarding murders and violence.

Just think about this:  My God, Jesus, talks about HIS blood.  The muslims talks about YOUR blood.  Trust me -- there is a difference!

No you didn't will you stop with your nonsense already. That article you posted is trash and you should be ashamed of yourself for believing that's mathematical proof.

I backed up the Biblical legitimacy with NUMBERS and with MATH......those other "religions" can not do that.......