td

3 hours ago, robanadana said:

Y'all need to work on the band. Unfortunately it's only a shadow of the Mighty Mustang band that used to cover the field when we played ya'll.

Our band is growing and they are awesome. I'm so proud of those kids. WOS just doesn't have the students we once had. Therefore our band is smaller. Can't expect as many kids in band as we had when we were 5A. 

Especially when the ones play about half the time. 

40 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

Can WOS beat Allen?

We don't need to beat Allen!!!!!!

I'm sure glad I chose this game to go to. What a great game. 

55 minutes ago, setxnative96 said:

@td I would like the T.O.P. of any team infact all teams they have played

LOL shouldn't be hard to find. 

50 minutes ago, setxnative96 said:

Lol not talking Defenses, but these teams are going out and playing WOS straight up, 3&outs after 3&outs I have every ounce of respect for WOS. Dont mistake that, Nevertheless, when you let a team put 60+ you are allowing them to have their way, these players may think they will win but them coaches arent showing that they have a chance. I wish we could look at Time of possession and see how it reflects . 

What do you want to know about time of possession? HJ game?

2 hours ago, wosfan1992 said:

Just a fun stat , WOS gave up 46 total yards the entire game last night. 44 came from the 1st half.

That was gross yards. Net yards which is what everyone goes by was a total of 16 yards given up. That's according to WOS stats. 

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

I don't remember that, but I hope they were kidding.  The game was a lot closer than the score ended up being last year when we played the bears. 

It was said before WOS and BC played.

back when WOS played BC didn't someone say that game would be closer than this game would be? If I remember correctly BC should win this game by 56. 

They'll be the one crying about running up the score!

The scoreboard works!!!!!!!! 

47 minutes ago, XX Man said:

I don't care how many controllers it has. If it needs another one to get the job done, then the scoreboard is BROKE. For years all of it worked, so why is it that it quit working? Regardless of why it is not working, it needs addressed and FIXED. Do you understand that???????????

LOL

The kids are focused on a much bigger prize than a scoreboard. It would be nice though. We had a chance to pass a bond a few years ago but the part to update the field didn't pass. 

I'll take our winning program and the rest of y'all can have your fantcy scoreboards. Lol

Did y'all not hear the man tell y'all that the scoreboard works????? There is one controller. MrUmp1 was kind enough to say that the officials only work the clock. I'm sure it would be overworking them to ask them to also keep up with the down and the to go part of the scoreboard too. It's ridiculous that they won't do it. 

2 minutes ago, Sunoco said:

Why not a recent  alumni that also currently plays in the NFL donate one?

It's easy for you to spend his money. 

28 minutes ago, skipper said:

paul  ivory will fill in just find as he has a lot of playing time under his belt  it good that Thompson has been able to play a lot of kids

Who is he going to fill in for????

7 hours ago, Yeoj said:

Really! Dude get out of Orange more and stop drinking that BC water. Teams aren't afraid to play WOS. You guys are just not as high on the priority list as you think when it comes to scheduling. Smh... This is getting ridiculous. As far as the best RB in the area, who are the people that get paid to recognize talent picking? That would be Calvin "Lil C" Tyler, as evidenced by his multiple D-I offers.

I didn't say anything about anyone being afraid to play WOS. Nor did I say anything about Lil C's talent and I'm certainly not in BC or drinking their water. 

11 minutes ago, ST413 said:

Hmm....WOS had Kipp and BC so they had 2 intramural teams on their schedule!!

Not sure what WOS has to do with this but we had a lot of teams not want to play us. KIPP was our only option and we took our people out and didn't run up stats.

I'll take J Shaw from WOS.

Win by 1or 100 and you still only get 1 win. 

6 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Well, if I'm not mistaken, wasn't it your defense that gave up the long runs to give good field position from the beginning?  You wouldn't have been pinned that deep.  

So you say the defense wasn't scored on...  So was the offense scored on? Which is it? 

Keep I'm mind I'm not being sarcastic, be you and I are discussing a serious question...

If I'm not mistaken it was turnovers that gave them that field position. But in my opinion and remember I'm a baseball guy, yes it would be the offense that gave up the points either way. The defense held them. It seems to me that if the other offense didn't score you can't say the defense gave up any points. Bend but don't break theory. 

10 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

You know the answer to that.  I don't want to answer because I don't want to be the reason yall's mood is dampered on this beautiful and cool Saturday morning...  

I told you it was a serious question. Can't dampen my mood. I'm a "win by 1 kinda guy".  I don't really care about shutouts. The statement was "first points given up by the defense" if I read it right. I'm a baseball guy not football. Are you saying the safety for offensive holding goes against the defense?

People have to realize the important numbers are 6-0. I agree we need to clean up a few things but we are gonna be just fine. 

47 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

This is one of the more asinine statements that I've read.. 

Any who, congrats to WO-S on another win.  I picked them to loose to Kennedale early in the season and I was wrong.  Cruise through district, stay healthy, and do the dang thing again (state championship).

Why is the statement asinine? Serious question. Maybe I missed something.