AggiesAreWe

fyi..im sure you know but those were prob the only EARNED runs yall had..not tryin to talk smack just letting people know..and hf played a good game..but we just had to many errors throughout the game from everyone all the way from the field to the plate//o and the umps didnt help not sayin thats why we lost but they were not very good at all..from both sides Question, was all of HJ's runs earned?

The best thing about this win though, Gabe owes me $20!!!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D

66-62 Ozen in the 4th, 2:30 left.

This VERY YOUNG Tiger team could actually be 3-0, should be 2-1, but will take this BIG win over Orangefield to get to 1-2 in district. This team will be up and down all season because of their youth but gotta give'em a hand on this win. Who know's, maybe they are not 2 years away.

Uh Nos, you need to freshen up on your golf lingo. It's a sand trap or bunker, not sand pit. ;D

There is nothing wrong with keeping your identity hidden.

Imagine that, a "football" team beat a basketball team. Go figure. DV, don't you find it amazing that this "football" team scored 121 points? Oh and look, the "beaten the team by 45" rears it's ugly head again. I know what that's about. :'(

My sources have told me that also. Is any of the Coach's that made the final cut are from a school that starts with the Letter G. That, I do not know.

My sources have told me that also.

Just because he played football, why does that make him a football guy? Typical, change the subject to gain some self pride. No change the subject because some of you will argue until next month about the same topic...its over..you have your thought, and I have mine..move on....THATS what I was doing....Self pride? please..... : : Its dumb to go round and round about something that no one's mind will be changed over.....Us beating HJ by about 40 when I played....That would have happened if they were willing to play up back then.....(cricket noises).. No, what's dumb is you changing the subject to something that has nothing to do with this thread. You were losing the argument, now you want to take your ball and go home.

That was my thinking all along. Also my thinking on the BISD stadium. It will be finished in 2040. ;D Sounds like someone is jealous that Silsbee will not have the better stadium anymore.... : Sure, this little town of 6,000 people should be jealous of a stadium being built in a 100,000 pop city. My comments about BISD stadium has nothing to do with Tiger Stadium and how great the BISD stadium will be. It has everything to do with how BISD operates.

Just because he played football, why does that make him a football guy? Typical, change the subject to gain some self pride.

That was my thinking all along. Also my thinking on the BISD stadium. It will be finished in 2040. ;D

Okay, Nos now has DV dormy with 6 holes remaining!

Those last few examples you stated are not good ones. Bigger schools with bigger enrollments allow for "specialization". : No trend there.

After 9 holes of play completed, Nos is 4 up on DV!!!! ;D

IMO, that's where my Aggies need to start. GET THAT WRECKING CREW DEFENSE BACK!!!! Everything else will fall into place.

It's not the two teams decision. It should require DISTRICT approval. If the other teams in the district have no problem, then move it. The district schedule is approved by each teams Superintendent in advance, any changes should require their approval as well. UIL Policy: Schedules Athletic schedules will not be considered official until approved by the superintendent of the member school district. I totally agree. It should have to go through a district committee. Two coaches shouldn't have the total authority on changing the district schedule. Too many questions come up when you have that kind of leeway. What if Nederland wanted to move their game up just like Vidor and LCM did yet the other team did not want to? Is that fair? This kind of freedom allows the possibility of coercion. That's why you see the collegiate and pro level never do this. If they get a rainout, then they adjust their schedules accordingly afterward. It is only the fair way. I understand when coaches want to move their games up to avoid weather, but it should be all the games moved or none at all. With the weather we get around here, there is no guarantee that you'll get the rain or bad weather. This is only a district play problem, this should not be considered in non-district play. As someone pointed out earlier in this thread, Vidor and Nederland did this very thing last year to avoid a rainout on their scheduled game date and no one got their feathers ruffled. Now suddenly it is an issue? They aren't moving games around because of a wild hair to do so, these coaches see a problem brewing later in the week due to the weather and did what was best for their programs. I feel certain if it were possible for Nederland to do the same thing they would have with no questions asked, just like they did last year. I am also certain that both coaches had to agree on this before this could be possible. Bottom line is, the district committee ruled in favor of letting these teams play and they did. It is all said and done, time for the whiners to move on.... And that is my point. Just because they did it last year does not make it right. Besides, last year is irrelevant to this year. Another point, Nederland may not of had the opportunity to move their game up because the other team did not want too. That's where the possibility of coercion could come in. I have no dog in this hunt. But I just think being able to move games in this manner is not right. Either move them all, or leave them put.

After Nederland brought it up. It should never come to that. If two teams want to move their game, they should have to bring it up before the district to get approval, not have another team have to call them on it. Besides, I didn't think it was brought before the district, I thought it was brought before the UIL.

I agree. The Spirit Of Aggieland can be summed up like this: "From the outside looking in, it's hard to understand. From the inside looking out, it's hard to explain."

It's not the two teams decision. It should require DISTRICT approval. If the other teams in the district have no problem, then move it. The district schedule is approved by each teams Superintendent in advance, any changes should require their approval as well. UIL Policy: Schedules Athletic schedules will not be considered official until approved by the superintendent of the member school district. I totally agree. It should have to go through a district committee. Two coaches shouldn't have the total authority on changing the district schedule. Too many questions come up when you have that kind of leeway. What if Nederland wanted to move their game up just like Vidor and LCM did yet the other team did not want to? Is that fair? This kind of freedom allows the possibility of coercion. That's why you see the collegiate and pro level never do this. If they get a rainout, then they adjust their schedules accordingly afterward. It is only the fair way. I understand when coaches want to move their games up to avoid weather, but it should be all the games moved or none at all. With the weather we get around here, there is no guarantee that you'll get the rain or bad weather. This is only a district play problem, this should not be considered in non-district play.

Definetly! Seeing them on the Jumbotron almost makes the cost of my season tickets worth it!

I never understood why the lower classifications, mostly 1A, played their games at 4:30. Makes no sense. Is there any logical explanation for this other than finishing early?

Could someone expound on what I am hearing of a Vidor player being a showboat and being classless in this game? I was not there, just going off of what I heard.

6.67 million per year would make Calipari the highest paid in college sports.