BMTSoulja1

I'm just so glad it's no Silsbee Lite vs. Central Fun Size... lol

If anything, I think you're short changing Kalon. he's more closer to 6'3"...

'Often times bigger isnt better against a team built like Silsbee.' That part is what I agreed with...

True...

Lol... And Harris is definitely not 6'3". omg. lol

...And Devin is NOT 6'4". lol Nice try though.. just talked to him Friday. he's 6'3". And Tre Jones is NOT 6'5"... he's closer to 6'4". But I do get your point though...

Central , I believe don't have anyone 6'6" this year. . they do have a kid 6'5" and quite a few 6'4" kids who appear very athletic. I don't have the exact numbers because I was unable to get a program...

Silsbee - 75 Central - 72 Central has length size and homecourt advantage, yea, but one thing you can't teach is experiencing. These Tigers have it and shouldn't be rattled and come out and get the dub. Silsbee won't have anyone to check Dill or Arcenaux, but Central has no one to check D. McCain or Adams... should be interesting.

When you're wearing shades at night...

Great post!

Dumb comment here... the riff raff have been gone for at least 4 years now...

See the detractors in full force? Now if I say something about WO-S and that they care about or don't care about, I'd be wrong...

Exactly... just dumb foolish comments... with no thoughts behind them...

The dumbest post ever...

One coach was run off for sub par performances from a school from a neighboring school district and the other is only here because he couldn't get a job at the school he graduated years ago and when the old coach retires, he STILL won't get the job. So who cares what they say. I would say they didn't have to take the job, but they probably had one option at that time. ...but that ain't non of my business.

Some of y'all are so delusional that you'd agree with anything...

...And you say this after he does something dumb to put his job in jeopardy? Sounds like he set himself up the fail.. The kids needed him to day vs. Westfield...

And we talked and I told you I wasn't upset. Forgot that convo?

I'm not upset at all. Not angry... just having trouble understanding some of your logic.

Not at all. Are you having mental issues or something? Most would see that I'm looking at it from a third party approach and going toward the devil's advocate route.

Or Nederland ISD with recent events?

How can you prove when cameras are turned off or on? Why take that chance? I mean, WHO skates in the rules like that?

1. You have no idea of my age. 2. I'm already wise, I reach my kids many things about life. 3. You just assumevi do nothing for BISD or BISD kids. Again, fella, you have no clue, but you just ASSUME, like you assumed I'm not a Christian and I have no church home. 4.There are more people that take me serious on this subject than the detractors made evident via many private messages, text messages, and phone calls. They don't have selective comprehension. 5. I've never seen someone that when you don't agree with someone and you lose the debate, you then attempt to dog and question someone's faith... that's a new loser tactic for me since I've been posting in sports message boards, 10+ years....

Smh... the selective comprehension is real. Parents should be held liable for their kid's actions... If a kid steals, then the kid should be held accountable... if not the kid, then the parent...

So you can really justify installing hidden cameras where minors are getting dressed and undressed and honestly say that it's ok? Do you have a kid/kids?