Jump to content

Cougtalk

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,375

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Cougtalk

  2. Crosby (69) @ Baytown Sterling (21) - FINAL

    in High School Football

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, THS99 said:

    Honest question - How is this situation different than what happened at San Marcos High School?

    As far as I'm aware no recruiting violations have been proven, or even brought to the Executive Committee. I think the difference is the level of proof. Also, San Marcos was just made playoff eligible last week. 

    Also, the number of students does matter. 

  4. Crosby (69) @ Baytown Sterling (21) - FINAL

    in High School Football

    Posted

    @kenny powers

    @Separation Scientist

     

    Just a question for yall, Is he eligible right now? or is he serving a suspension by the DC? Also, normally the penalty is a year ban. There are some instances of longer bans but those generally require faking residency. So why do you think he will be ineligible next year? I'm genuinely interested, and I'm not finding instances of complete bans on students, almost always the UIL rules ineligible for the remainder of season. 

    Also anyone else that has actionable knowledge about this process would be welcome to chime in. 

     

    To be clear this is what the UIL Parent Manual Says: 

    "A student who changes schools for athletic purposes is not eligible to compete in varsity UIL athletic contest(s) at the school to which he or she moves for at least one calendar year, even if both parents move to the new school district attendance zone." 

     

    And before you say district executive committee 

    "If the District Executive Committee where the student now lives finds at any time that the change was made for athletic purposes, it shall declare that student ineligible to participate in athletic contests for one year. This may include a student who did not compete at the previous school. If the committee decides that the period of ineligibility should be longer than one year, the committee shall transfer the case to the State Executive Committee.

    Subject to Section 403 (f) and 463 (2)(A), a student who has established varsity eligibility under this section at a member school but who subsequently enrolls in another member school and is found to have changed schools for athletic purposes remains eligible at the school, where eligibility was first established." 

  21. 5AD1 District 8 and Region 2 discussion.

    in High School Football

    Posted

    19 hours ago, LoboFan07 said:

    That'd be a pretty remarkable run all things considered.

    Round 1 - Lancaster
    Round 2 - Frisco Reedy, likely district champs
    Round 3 - #2 Mansfield Timberview
    Round 4 - #1 Longview
    Round 5 - Aledo/Denton Ryan/Burleson Centennial
    Round 6 - College Station, A&M Consolidated, Richmond Foster, Someone else since that side is so wide open.

    Good luck with that lol

    No I was talking about our previous run to state. 

    Round 1- Willowridge 

    Round 2- #4 Texas High

    Round 3- #5 Huntsville 

    Round 4 - #2 Fortbend Marshall 

    Round 5 - #6 Liberty Hill

    Finals - #1 Aledo. 

     

  23. 5AD1 District 8 and Region 2 discussion.

    in High School Football

    Posted

    Pretty sure that our bidistrict will split unless something crazy happens like PAM just decides to not play. 

     

    As for Crosby we just need to get as close to 100% healthy before the LP game and then play the best football of the season. The only world Crosby does anything this year is 3 seed and finds a way to beat an extremely tough Lancaster team to steal their seed. Unlikely but not that much more unlikely then our 2nd place run to a State Finals. 

×
×
  • Create New...