Leaderboard

This appears to essentially be what caused the Michael Morton Act in Texas playing out in front of us. In Brady v. Maryland the Supreme Court ruled that exculpatory evidence (tending to show not guilty) must be turned over to the defendant. Brady was charged with taking part in a robbery and murder. He confessed to the robbery but said that his accomplice was solely responsible for the murder. A jury convicted Brady of robbery and murder. Later it was discovered that the accomplice had already confessed to the murder but the prosecution withheld that evidence from the jury. Oops! So under the Supreme Court Brady Rule, exculpatory evidence must be turned over to the defense. The prosecution, however, gets to determine what it thinks is exculpable. Michael Morton was wrongfully convicted of murder in Texas where the prosecution withheld evidence. The prosecution basically said, we didn’t think that evidence was important so we didn’t give it to the defense. Because of this unseen evidence, Texas passed the Michael Morton Act that requires turning over all police evidence to the defense and not making a determination on what the prosecution thinks is important. So like a jury in the Michael Morton trial, it appears or is claimed that the bipartisan committee never saw some of the evidence. In Michael Morton’s case the jury rendered a verdict that seemed reasonable….. until the hidden evidence was discovered. Did the same happen in the bipartisan committee? That is the accusation but the Democrats aren’t interested in hearing the evidence for obvious reasons. Like the Michael Morton case, where a man was wrongfully convicted of murder, the Democrats are apparently satisfied with, “Oh well, it’s the evidence that we had at the time, case closed”.

82.7% of statistics are made up on the spot. Steven Wright

3

Trump asked for Epstein Grand Jury testimony to be released......Judge blocked it - and actually said he can't release it per law - so, who can legally release it? As far as his name in the files, Wouldn't you expect that? It was already known that they associated in social events and functions. Trump was on the flight logs with his family. It is known he banned him from Mara Lago over hitting on someone's daughter. Meanwhile, Obama looks like he will be the first President investigated for sabotaging an incoming president........But lets talk about Trump and Epstein in the late 1980's......

This team is finally starting to show a little bit of that spark they had a couple of seasons ago. Hopefully they can keep stacking up series wins. They’re 8-2 over their last 10. This is the first time they’ve looked this good since they started the season 8-2

Weasel brags he’ll get those Epstein files released if he’s elected. Attorney General announces “Nothing to see here”. WSJ and AP report Weasel’s name appears several times in the files. What is a reasonable response to this sequence of events?

How am I hypocritical? Good crawfish btw. Wait till the truth comes out. We will all see who the hypocrites are. Sad part is, you and your cronies won’t accept the truth……never have.

Yeah lol.. I hear ya...its coming 🍿

I think Putin’s laughing his arse off at all of this stuff.

The whole shebang.. Three Republicans voted with the Democrats. [Hidden Content]

No answer to the question? Just an infantile meme?

The EO specified anyone born after Feb. 19, 2025. Do try to keep up.

Another court shoots down Trump's birthright citizenship claim. So how many generations do we go back. Trump's grandfather was not born here. So was Trump's dad a citizen?

MAGA cult has gotten accustomed to this con man. They will continue to circle the wagon. Protector of a pedophilia and or accomplish. Spin master.

Obama handling this well! If they got it prove it and indict.. pretty simple Big Ole nothing burger just like with Hillary.. Even us uniformed Americans know this... 🤡🌎

Man you reason with any story/news that possibly exonerates the clown... use your brain sometimes! Yall claim no way D's had this info but Saturday on it during last election.. is it safe to say now thatba judge blocked the release is the reason they didn'tuse it? We can go in circles all day with these games yall play... the more it's talked about the guiltier he looks

Just as inaccurate a statement as some from the Trump supporters. FACT: The bipartisan committee stated that Russia ATTEMPTED to influence the 2016 election. It also found it had little to no effect on the election results, and didn’t change any outcomes. Did Russia interfere? The conclusion was ‘yes’. Just as they’ve done for decades. Two separate issues that many conflate. As far as a diversion, the timing is suspect. But, not definitive or out of the ordinary in politics. As I’ve mentioned, the Parties always seem to have something in hand ready to pull out in an emergency. Even if a diversion, it doesn’t make the accusation any less true. At the least, Obama has never acknowledged that Clinton paid for the dossier that blew the whole episode out of proportion, and led to some highly suspect surveillance of an opposing political campaign. He hasn’t admitted that to this day, even though he knew before the 2016 election.

@biggirl Gabbard declassified documents revealing "overwhelming evidence" that demonstrated how, after Trump won the 2016 election against Clinton, then-President Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would be the yearslong Trump–Russia collusion probe. [Hidden Content]

I think that was already known. He was already a celebrity of sorts, and easily recognizable to most. Easy to recall if he attended a party. Some of the other wealthy elites may not have been as well known. If I were asked to remember who was there, I’d probably remember a Harrison Ford, Sean Connery, or someone like that over a Steven Schwarzman (co-founder of Blackstone Group & worth about $52 Billion) who isn’t seen a lot outside of the elite type power circles. I don’t see this as a big, breaking story.

Keeping in mind, he likely will not be the main "puller".

I was lucky enough to see him with the astros and the RANGERS. Actually saw his 1st attempt at win #300. It was on my birthday at old Arlington stadium. When he left the game it was tied so he got a no-decision. He got win 300 a few days later at Milwaukee. If you haven’t seen it watch the Netflix documentary called Facing Nolan. It’s pretty good.

2-1 dub and sweep of the A's.

Sylvia Garcia had the state change the road to/from the San Jacinto Battleground Monument from Battleground Road to Independence Pkwy. Cost the businesses a ton to change all their info & the truckers were lost for weeks. Also, had to change the Deer Park vs La Porte Rivalry football game (one of the oldest town vs town big school rivalries in the state) from The Border War to The Border Battle. Apparently ‘Battle’ was more palatable than ‘War.’

[Hidden Content]

Those folks don’t like it when you bring up their predictions, lol.

Spot on.

By 1/2 game

About the same as yours. Except I’m at least part of the supposed offended group. What’s your involvement? You’re the one who didn’t even know what The Trail of Tears was while I had ancestors walk it. Probably not a good topic for you.

I would imagine if the Washington franchise had offered to share a small portion of royalties from merch sales, no one would have been offended at all. As it is, my peeps make their own reparations the easy way anyway. From drunk white folks at the casinos. 😂

This is what conservatism looks like! [Hidden Content]

Jaedon Ned is also switching to RB

Lots of good news today - The Japan deal has the market kicking...... I remember not so long ago, on this forum, the overnight Tariff experts were claiming Trump would devastate the economy with his tariff shenanigans.......🤣