All Activity

Still dont like musk, that said..... glad he spoke out and put pressure on these folks to release the files... "but but where was your outrage the last 4 years" hell get Biden and whoever else is hiding stuff.. I wouldn't piss on any of em if they were burning... we're waiting

😂!!!! So predictable man What an embarrassing day for don the con and president musk! Hopefully they come to an agreement 😂

👀

If there is something to defend, I defend it. If not, I condemn it. You do neither. Anti-Trump (TDS) is for real. People who hate Trump and Musk for DOGE, will now back Musk for this. How two-faced can one get?

🍿

I am a never Trumper. Always have been. Don was completely caught off guard when his Attorney General was so excited about releasing the files. As always maga cult surrounds the wagon.

Well, I quoted dct. | have said on many posts that if Trump is proven to have had sex with underaged girls on the island, then get him too. Problem is…..don’t we all want EVERYONE on the list? My loyalty question was to the libs who, all of a sudden, are Musk followers.

Not loyal to any party. The dems may not have called Trump out because too many dems would have to fall as well.

June 5th Game Port Neches(3-1)@ B.C.(2-1)@7pm

JUNE 4th FINAL SCORES Nederland- 9 Bridge City- 8 Port Neches- 11 H.F.- 1

Read my post again. If people really thought this was true, the Epstein thread wouldn’t have died like it did. You didn’t demand a release for over 4 years. It something that gets people anxious. All you Musk haters are now on board with him. What loyalty to your party.

What happened to the binders that the Attorney General was parading to the news outlets?

Release them as he promised.

We had better choices the Kamala Biden and Trump.

I completely agree.

With all the lies and fake charges that the dems threw at Trump, including assassination, do you truly think that if they had Epstein evidence on Trump that they would not have already released it themselves? Do you really believe that or does it just give you a warm feeling to post it?

You’re missing the point. They’re ALL con men/women.

He is truly a Con man at his best. 🍿 sit back and watch the fireworks 🎆. They are turning on one another. We now know why the Epstein files will not be released. ⭐️ baby king Con.

This is unfortunate. The real story isn’t Musk’s indignation or the poor way Trump is handling the situation though. That’s just the side show to keep us from focusing on the real issue. And it’s bipartisan. Our politicians from the bottom to the top are a group of thieving, lying grifters who do what they want and when they want without genuine regard for the general population. It friggin sickening. These spending bills are a joke along with the process with which they are contrived. Just bend over and take it and be happy about it.

I doubt that.

Blind loyalty is an easy response. But it's called being able to read between the lines. And not making judgements until all the facts are available. At this point the riff between the two doesn't make sense. Like I said in another post, Musk knew the EV subsidies were not going to be included. So why make a big deal about it now?!

He knew this was going to happen a long time ago. So, why get upset about it now. Unless, like I said before -- it's just a game to give people and the media something silly to talk about!

Mexico sued several US firearms manufacturers as being responsible for murders in Mexico It was not completely unexpected to be a winning case for firearms manufacturers but the unanimous decision, authored by Kagan, is a welcome sight. The case is Smith & Wesson et al. V. Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Mexico) Smith & Wesson was sued along with six other gun manufacturers (Colt, Glock, Ruger, Baretta, etc.) in the United States by Mexico. The claim (that might have shut them down) was that those manufacturers were responsible for gun violence in Mexico and because the cartels used American manufactured guns. Mexico claimed that since the manufacturers did not strictly police or regulate who bought goes from FFL’s, they were responsible. The First Circuit Court of Appeals covering Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire and Puerto Rico ruled in favor of Mexico saying the suit could go forward. The firearms manufacturers appealed to the Supreme Court and their ruling was issued a few hours ago. A unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the federal law, Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, protects firearms manufacturers from lawsuits in state and federal courts unless it can be shown that the manufacturer was complicit by aiding and abetting the illegal gun transfers. Mexico showed no evidence that any of the manufacturers were knowingly helping the drug cartels to obtain the guns. The decision was authored by Elana Kagan who in her order wrote…. “Finally, Mexico's allegations about the manufacturers’ design and marketing decisions" add nothing of consequence. As noted above, Mexico here focuses on the manufacturers' production of "military style" assault weapons, among which it includes AR-15 ri-fles, AK-47 rifles, and .50 caliber sniper rifles. But those products are both widely legal and bought by many ordinary consumers. (The AR-15 is the most popular rifle in the country.) The manufacturers cannot be charged with assisting in criminal acts just because Mexican cartel members like those guns too” So in the Opinion of the Court written by Kagan, the AR15, AK47 and similar guns are “widely legal and bought by many ordinary consumers”. She then noted that the AR15 is the most popular rifle in the country. That language may come up in the next session or two when the Supreme Court takes up the assault weapons ban in some states under the premise that they should not be included in the common use test in the Supreme Court cases of Heller and Bruen. The main facts that are important here in my opinion are that even the liberal leaning justices, saw the stupidity of Mexico‘s claim and issued a ruling to protect gun manufacturers against what I think is a frivolous claim and that Kagan wrote the opinion. In doing so wrote that the assault rifles and even sniper rifles were widely legal and purchased by consumers and that the AR15 was the most popular rifle in the country. The flabbergasting part is that the First Circuit Court thought that the manufacturers should be liable if one of their weapons was later used to commit a crime. I guess in their opinion, if a drunk driver killed someone, the family should be able to sue Exxon-Mobil for manufacturing the gasoline.

Yeah that must be it 🤦🏻

Let’s see. Elon donated almost $300 million in the last election. The bill they are arguing about (allegedly because Trump is back to spending money like a drunken sailor in a cathouse) also cut heavy subsidies for EV manufacturers. Someone remind me how Elon made most of his money? C’mon fellas, we don’t need Sherlock to solve this riddle. And Elon for as brilliant as he undoubtedly is, apparently didn’t do much research. This man has a history of stiffing people, even when it’s in writing. He should be pissed at himself for thinking a handshake/ wink wink deal was fool proof.