All Activity

[Hidden Content] kind of a wild one

Three weeks into district season Team Silsbee 4-0 Bridge City 5-1 Vidor 5-1 LCM 2-2 Lumberton 2-4 WOS 0-4 Jasper 0-6 Big games coming up 3/31-4/3 Sisbee v Bridge City Vidor v WOS LCM v Lumberton Jasper at Sealy

Those fields look beautiful with that turf. Hope for the best for OF!

Shows how stupid they are. Or, they are for illegal aliens being allowed to vote. Pretty sure it’s both.

From what I’ve read they believe it’s voter suppression. Lol

What you saw was not someone's conspiracy theory. Grok is X's AI program. You ask for the info you need and in seconds it populates the answer. Throughout you'll see where it got the certain bits of info from. So, go back and read it. Gen. Flynn, just like Roger Stone, was set up to try and make him turn on Trump. When he didn't, they prosecuted him. Again, just like Roger Stone.

Yep

Funny not one of you Democrats complain about the prices when Biden was running the show. Just more made up reasons to gripe.

This question may have already been asked. Really don’t want to back through 9 pages to find out. Why are democrats against using a photo ID to vote? I know why, just want to see if any liberal here wants to tell the truth about why. Probably not!

Read my Bible. Pretty good one coming from a left wing democrat whose party has no problem killing babies or pandering to the homosexuals. Maybe you should do the same, you think!

Trump effect……he can make people contradict themselves. Lmao

God used Judas to betray Jesus right into the will of God so no worries here. 😎

I think it’s the pinnacle of hubris to think that God would pick a political side.

[Hidden Content]

You remind me of that individual that always says I am not going to church because there’re too many hypocrites. And I say come on in there’s always room for one more. Point being we are ALL FLAWED INDIVIDUALS.

Just keeping this up close to the top because oral arguments are this Wednesday. Thought we could continue using this thread. I still think this is going to be one of the most fascinating oral arguments in a long time, and it will have possibly the greatest impact on America as any case in the last 100 years or more. It will be interesting to see how things fall out in questioning. I see the 3 liberal Justices just going with the status quo. I see 4 Justices going more with the originalism/textualism viewpoint. I see 2 Justices being open to the original intent of the 14th, but wanting to make sure their ruling only applies going forward, and how best to address it if they rule for original intent. The arguments for original intent are stronger than many think. Getting over the hurdle of history is still a tall task. But, this SCOTUS has shown a willingness to break with bad precedents in previous rulings. So, we'll see.

[Hidden Content]

The part in bold is just another sign of you being CB.. Only he would make that comment. BTW, LumRaiderFan is not banned. I guess he decided not to come back from his week of vacation.

God is about to use Donkeys to rebuke Trump and MAGA come November. Amen.

He just said the same thing that I’ve been saying all along. You have the presumption of innocence, but you can never be proven innocent. If we already know that you can’t be proven innocent, why would there need to be a policy in the FBI code that states what everybody knows. I guess the better question is why did they decide to include the language about the investigation “not exonerating” Trump? It seems superfluous to me… because I understand basic principles. Most people have cloudy views. A popular leader is investigated over alleged criminal wrongdoings, and the final reporting says “we found evidence that indicates criminal acts occurred, but we do not believe that a conviction can be won… we are closing our investigation, but this is not an exoneration of politician T.” The crowd goes wild and says “see? T didn’t don anything wrong! Fire the guy who looked into it! We’ll all celebrate when he dies!” Kinda like when the DOJ decided to end their investigations into Trump when he retook office in 2024 because they didn’t want to indict a sitting president. The Trumpers took that as “proof” that the investigations had “proven Trump innocent” when in fact they were closed despite the fact that there was a LOT of evidence of criminal wrongdoings.

Let’s not forget this is Robert Mueller.

Hasn’t been addressed since about 1980, the when the deficit began to take off hence the Uniparty.