All Activity
- Past hour
-
I think he went in with the noblest of intentions. Whether convinced by outside intel or not is irrelevant. He made the choice. My firm belief is he thought Iran would fold, and collapse early on. He didn't understand the regime, and has recently admitted as much when he backtracked on thinking he could negotiate with them, and called them crazy. He should have known all along. But, many Western minds just don't get it. They can't tie the religious zealot mind to something they can comprehend. Yes. I believe he feels it needs to be done. But, not for altruistic reasons, or even National Security. Now, it's his pride, arrogance, and legacy. He doesn't want the black mark. He wants to be remembered as the POTUS who stopped the terrorist regime and proxies in the Middle East, and this isn't looking good for him. He can't stop now. That being said, round up the C-130's, their escorts & about 4 MOABs, and let it rain. Then, decide if a tactical ground assault in key, specific areas is still required.
- Today
-
What a quality bunch! LOL!!
-
Texas Senate Race -- Ken Paxton vs James Talarico
Reagan replied to Reagan's topic in Political Forum
I hope this mentally ill Talarico keeps talking! LOL!! -
5GallonBucket reacted to a post in a topic:
Even More From The Friendly muslims!
-
thetragichippy reacted to a post in a topic:
Even More From The Friendly muslims!
-
Great assessment. No matter what happens, you will always have the naysayers……didn’t happen soon enough, cost too much money, yada yada yada. Trump tried diplomacy to appease the masses. Except for Israel, Trump had no allied help. In fact, some turned their backs on him, but that’s another story. No one has ever told Trump what to do, although it makes great headlines and talking points. Trump is doing what no other administration had the balls to do. People also hated Truman for dropping the bombs. It had to be done.
-
I wonder if everyone thought that in World War I and II? I guess back then maybe not, because newspapers and radio/television had such a tight hold on information, they could control the narrative of the day. I did use Grok for some information - in the 1940's (WWII) spending as a share to GDP was about 41-+45% - Recent years it has been around 23% - With that said, I'm ready to end the Iran mission and get back to normal.
-
I had no problem with Trump doing what he did last summer to Iran when specifically stated that “We obliterated Iran’s Nuclear Capabilities” and chastised anyone who said differently. It’s my opinion that Trump is institutional in making a lot of his decisions. I believe Bibi talked him into this dumpster fire that we’re in right now. As far as losing the house and the senate regardless who’s in charge the debt continues to rise and the bombs continue to drop. I believe we’ve already been conquered from within. Our politicians knowingly are spending us into a financial crisis that is not sustainable.
-
Obviously didn’t read what Martin Luther, John Quincy Adams, or Winston Churchill had to say about the so-called ‘religion of peace.’ While I don’t paint all Muslims with the same brush, the belief system itself is built on violence, slavery, and lies. Of course, Obama hadn’t read their thoughts either when he defended the belief system at the U.N. in 2012, and he had the ‘benefit’ of 9/11 as proof. The Boston Marathon bombing in 2013 didn’t change his mind either.
-
OlDawg reacted to a post in a topic:
Even More From The Friendly muslims!
-
If Trump is successful in getting Iran to peace and no nuclear weapons, the history books will treat him well. No one will remember 6-8 months of high gas prices..... If he does not, this will be a bad spot on his Presidency. Personally, I used to think Trump made decisions based on his private poll teams assessment on what is popular and what side the majority agrees with. While I still believe that to a point, I truly believe the Iran issue is something he feels needs to be done, and would sacrifice losing house and senate if he can achieve the goal. He feels that strongly about it.....IMO
-
baddog reacted to a post in a topic:
Even More From The Friendly muslims!
-
Man, what a beautiful day. Think I’ll take the grandkids to one of their favorite places to eat.
-
Change started in 1965 with LBJ and congress opening up immigration for said people. And now it’s grown to where they have weaseled their way into govt positions. freedoms come with a cost
-
Vote on that on a stand alone bill and make politicians own their vote. SMH
-
piratevillain reacted to a post in a topic:
9-4A D1
-
TAMUC#1 reacted to a post in a topic:
Hardin 2026 Schedule
-
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to a post in a topic:
9-4A D1
-
I dont know much other than hearseay. Heard Lcm lost a few qualkity starter underclassmen to becoming baseball only. Also this is lcms freshman class that hasn't lost many games (if any that i can remember) as a group coming up we may see a few freshman on varisty.
-
rupert3 reacted to a post in a topic:
2026 Astros
-
rupert3 reacted to a post in a topic:
2026 Astros
-
Great come-from-behind win. That’s 4 in-a-row.
-
9-5 comeback win. Arrighetti had to leave after 2nd inning due to injury. Astros used 7 pitchers.
-
DCT reacted to a post in a topic:
Breaking News - TRUMP to release EPSTEIN files and client list!
-
Wish we had Jordan Jones coming up with them next year.
-
I sometimes wonder if the powers that be make sure we have to choose from 80 year olds who—understandably—aren’t at the top of their mental capacity, or other easily controlled ‘faces.’ I remember asking my dad before he passed at 87–and still active and President of the Board of a sizeable credit union—if he thought an 80 year old could still handle the tasks required of a POTUS. His answer was quick. “No way in heck.” I know there’s no upper age limit. But, I wonder if there should be…
-
By the ethnic appearance of the council, you could presume most or all are Muslim, which might explain their interpretation of the law.
-
This municipality misinterpreted the SCOTUS rulings on animal sacrifice, and capitulated to fear & a large Muslim contingent in their area. SCOTUS didn’t say animal sacrifice was legal in all cases. They ruled that religious activities—including animal sacrifice—couldn’t be prohibited unless it was a general rule that applied to everyone. If the city had a general ordinance that said “no killing of any animal by private, non-licensed professionals, or city sanctioned animal shelters unless there is inherent danger to life or health, and officials must be timely notified…”, or something along those lines, this wouldn’t be allowed. SCOTUS was attempting to protect religious liberty to the highest standard. This municipality just folded. Sad. Funny this is allowed, but California and other places were allowed to shutter churches during Covid, and deprive people of their freedom of religious assembly in the name of a health concern. Animal sacrifice and disposal could also be a health concern…
-
Good thing this place and my body is just temporary
- Yesterday
-
Anyone remember this from June of last year?
-
Change is a coming even if it’s slowly. [Hidden Content]