All Activity

*i think BC takes this, but i think its low scoring*

Ooops😂😂 meant to say BC takes this

Where are you getting your info? It hasn’t become any of those things. It is currently the party with ideas, not excuses.

STAAAANNNGGSSSS!!!

Yeah that one hurt. I still got yall in the playoffs, especially with that QB and wr’s

Gringos in Deer Park is where I will be dining

The district is changing. I say in 5 years, PAISD might be an 85-90 percent district of Hispanics who don’t care to play football

I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes. Certainly no one wants such as accusation but it seems likely that the deck is going to be stacked against them. If they are guilty of the accusations then they need to be put under the jail with extreme prejudice Now we have the governor appointing the AG who seems not to be looking at the case to see what is true or can be proven but the decision is already made. I think sexual assault kits should be performed up to 72 hours after the claimed assault but they may stretch the kits to maybe 7 days. If i read the article correctly, the kit was not performed for almost 3 weeks. It seems like with the little that is known, there might definitely be some issues with reasonable doubt. It’s unfortunate because the complete truth might never come out.

Exactly . And looking at the people Tandle played with those high scores, it’s like PAM beating up Pasadena schools… like LaPorte was doing

Explain struggling against Ball at half? Explain letting Brook anemic offense score over 40pts.

Yeah? Those LaPorte teams of the past were special because they played in a district to where it was tough with north shore being involved and a couple of others. The Laporte teams of recent years has played in a very soft district and imo making the superstars LOOK. good. IMO PAM keeps PAM from winning this. I think Brook improved a lot defensively since playing png. With that said LO recently went to the wire dealing with a Brook offense, imo just don’t have enough dawgs except the qb. LP STRUGGLED against the doormat of the district for a half a game with ball. Who if not more inexperienced as LP. I just don’t think they are good as they projected. Maybe they will prove me wrong, but I say 28-14 PAM. I feel this week, we might see the playbook open up a little more.

Galena Park is BAD. Bulldogs in an absolute beat down with the 2s and 3s getting lots of reps.

We will see how good Livingston really is. I don’t expect LCM to just dominate them. This game should be a lot closer than what is being anticipated. LCM wins within 1 score. I would be surprised if it’s a blowout.

No worries my friend. Always family first. Hope she's doing better. Look forward to seeing yall back supporting the Stangs as you've always done.

It's Galena Park (1-5) not Galena Park North Shore...I'll take the Dogs in this one

Sorry guys I wanted to do the picks from last week but my wife was in iuc in the hospital back im back at it again this week doe

I don't know what to expect from Huffman. They have losses to Shepherd, Splendora and Liberty. I thought they would get beat easily by LCM and somehow they won. Looking at the scores BC looks bad this year except they beat Lumberton. Not much would surprise me in this game. I know BC will have its hands full with Huffman's RB.

PAM’s typical point differential against common opponents is 18. LP’s is 13. Five points. I’m a fan of an attacking D. That’s why some LP folks were nervous about last year, and are nervous about this year’s team. We’re not used to DFW style football. Since we lost our DC to Shadow Creek, our D has been questionable at best. How much effect the loss has had, I can’t say for sure. I’m not involved with the program. But, the margins of victory aren’t far apart at all when you compare common opponents. They just come from different styles. Unless TO’s play a big role, and both teams play to average, this should be a one score game or less. If PAM doesn’t get any TO’s, your scoring average goes WAY down. PAM has been living off TO’s. LP hasn’t gotten many TO’s this year. (That’s part of the D issue.) So, if they don’t get any TO’s, it doesn’t affect their scoring average much at all. Yes. 4th round would be an accomplishment. As I’ve said, LP only has 3 or 4 starting Seniors between both the O & D. If the transfer portal doesn’t hit hard, next year would appear to be the next peak year for LP. LP’s been playing with a BU OL since game 1. Those players will be experienced next year. Plus, all the skill players would return except for the TE, and most of the D would return—with a year of experience and growth under their belt. If y’all are gonna try to make the series closer, this year is probably a better bet than next year. EDIT: I put the link to El Ranchero in the earlier post after you liked it if you want to check it out. I’d love to meet with y’all pregame as I haven’t seen some of y’all in years—from a past life when we all used to pregame together with some NS, Katy, and other fan bases. But, my better half requires 24/7/365 care now. So, I don’t get to go to games any more. I have to watch streams.

Yes. I had to read it twice. LOL

Well that's one way to make sure you get a prediction right.

I see you argument and raise you that I know damn well PA isn't #4. I wish they wasn't even ranked. It's only because of Desoto and HP among others losing early. As for the offensive out put, I'd take PA's point differential over LP's any day. As for Randle, if PA can get to the 4th round after replacing, and let me say this again, 9 starters on offense, is and outstanding accomplishment imo

Circle game 11/7 at 3pm

And HF has some great broadcasters on here!

Gotcha