All Activity
- Past hour
-
You still have no answer for why Trump said he would end the Ukraine-Russia War. Not only did Trump not end it he still kept sending billions of dollars to Ukraine. And now he’s going to make sure Iran gets $300 plus dollars! Smh
-
baddog reacted to a post in a topic:
The Art of the Squeal
-
baddog reacted to a post in a topic:
The Art of the Squeal
-
2026 Dave Campbell's Magazine Update
Separation Scientist replied to Matthew328's topic in High School Football
That would be cool but Sark would not show. He dodges all things TT! -
Picture of Reagan and Baddog having their daily worship gathering of Trump.
-
EXACTLY!
-
Trump could EASILY have sent the troops in and forcibly eliminated every last shred of the IRGC. We could have bombed the whole country to oblivion, destroyed their entire infrastructure, and turned Iran into a desert oil slick. He chose not to do that. Trump does not want to hurt the Iran people, nor do I want him to. So what would have happened if he had done this? The media and the left would have exploded with rage. 100%. They would scream about "American boots on the ground" and "innocent deaths" and called Trump a million (more) bad names. So he didn't. He brought an incredibly humane, surgical military operation to bear, and all but eliminated the head of the snake. He destroyed the Iran military and left their nuke program in rubble. He showed great restraint while accomplishing so much. So what happens now? People just want to complain, discredit, and nit pick everything he did do. The TDS consumed eternal critics will never be satisfied either way. If Trump does A, they scream he should have done B. If Trump does B, they scream he should have done A. If Trump claimed "water is wet", they would argue its not. TDS at its finest.
-
Because it's all about the TDS! Once you are in it you can never leave. It makes people say and do strange things! The sad part? They keep doing it over and over again! They can't help themselves!
-
Looks as if our main stream media has infected the world against us. I’ll keep posting this positive stuff.
-
Hundreds of billions of dollars sent to Ukraines. How did that benefit the US? What did we win? It’s the question of the day for Iran.
-
Porter reacted to a post in a topic:
Another Supreme Court case or maybe just comedy….
-
Separation Scientist reacted to a post in a topic:
The Art of the Squeal
-
Nobody is denying that, with that being said Trump said he would end the war with Ukraine and Russia within 24 hours of being president….a year and a half later it’s still going on. So why hasn’t he ended it? I guess it’s the same reason he can’t end the war he started in Iran. His mouth tends to get in the way perhaps? Here is what he said multiple times. I guess Zelensky and Putin don’t play!😂
-
Reagan reacted to a post in a topic:
Iran War Update
-
True! If Trump was President that war would never had happen. The Dems needed another money laundering apparatus. And they got it!
-
No-look1 reacted to a post in a topic:
TABC Showcase Schedule
-
Reagan reacted to a post in a topic:
Another Supreme Court case or maybe just comedy….
-
I don’t believe anyone has asked me a question. Now you’re just rambling again.
-
Porter reacted to a post in a topic:
The Art of the Squeal
-
Funny how you left the Iran war thread and moved on to Ukraine. That’s what people do when they have no answers, just complaints.
-
On Thursday the Supreme Court handed down a big decision in the case of Mullin v. Al Otro Lado. It deals with the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 (INA) that allows people to seek asylum in the US. More specifically it deals with the definition of the word “in”. This kind of flashes back to the Bill Clinton deposition about Monica Lewinsky when he famously said when asked about sex with her, it depends on what the meaning of the word is, is. That’s right folks. We had a multi page Supreme Court decision on the definition of the word “IN”. Jumping ahead to give y’all time to think about it, it was a 6 to 3 vote on the definition of the word “in”. Guess which three did not agree with the definition? On with the show….. The INA said that a person may seek asylum when he “arrives in the United States”. That’s basically the case. Of course it goes on for pages to give other cases to explain the intent of the law, etc., however, the question is, can you apply for a political asylum in the United States when you were not the”in” United States? The answer was no, but here is the funny part. Justice Alito in authoring the decision to explain what being “in” the US actually means, wrote this: “The running back does not arrive in the end zone (and six points do not go up on the scoreboard) when he is tackled at the 1-yard line by the defense. The guest does not arrive in the house when the homeowner locks the door right before the guest tries to open it. The army does not arrive in the city when the city’s defenders repel the attack outside city limits. And the letter does not arrive in the mailbox when a dog assaults the carrier a step away from the mailbox. A person arrives in a destination only when he enters it, and that conclusion does not change because someone or something blocks entry. A person arrives in the United States, then, only when he enters it.” That’s about as simple and in plain English as you can get. Therr was no need for legalese to explain the situation. The dissent said that being outside of the US is the same as being in the US. 🤣🤣🤣 🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁 After the drum roll, the question that everyone has been wondering about…… which three justices did not agree that being in the United States meant being in the United States? Clue: One doesn’t know what a woman is.
-
You tend to do that when you have no answer for the truth about Trump. It’ll be ok.
-
Trump doesn't play. He's pretty well decimated very thing called Iran. He's sympathetic to the people. He knows what's he's doing. You honestly don't think he understands the situation?! BTW, I see you got another "laugh" response from the long-time tenant of the TDS cult. Again, tells me a lot!
-
I can see how childish you can be. I’ll leave it all to you.
-
Didn’t Trump tell the Iranian people to rise up that help was on the way after the regime had already slaughtered 40,000 of its own people? What happened to the help?
- Today
-
No it did need to be replayed. As much as the left has tried to destroy Trump since his first election which I totally disagree with it and can’t understand why no one has been held accountable, this 2nd term and his stupid decisions and narcissistic rambling of his mouth is ALL ON HIM. Keep making excuses for him. Lol Here let me post it again so you can watch it.
-
Evil is as evil does!
-
Bruh… do you realize how many months he’s already wasted letting Iran play him! Lol
-
That didn’t need to be replayed. I know what Trump said. Since you watch Fox News, you should have known Zelensky blew it like the punk he is.
-
I’m a positive person. It’s the negative attitude that cries about everything everyday. It’s also much easier for people to be negative.
-
Cry harder, I know it’s never Trumps fault.
-
Trump knew what he was dealing with before he started running his piehole, your excuses for Trump’s narcissistic big mouth is pathetic. Let me replay it for you.