All Activity

Not too surprised. He had a good run there. Won a couple district titles and made a few regional championships. But I think he took the program as far as he could.

From the article: "FBI Director Kash Patel dropped a major bombshell on the massive Minnesota fraud scandal on Sunday, revealing that the FBI is pushing for denaturalization and deportation of many involved in the $250 million scheme that ripped off taxpayer dollars meant for hungry kids during COVID. Patel made it clear this is “just the tip of a very large iceberg,” with investigations ramping up to expose even more corruption in federal programs." [Hidden Content]

From the article: "As Hillary Clinton closed in on the presidential nomination in the spring of 2016, FBI field officers advised colleagues at headquarters to press her on the foreign donations flowing to the Clinton Foundation while she steered American foreign policy and whether she had used the charity as a campaign piggy bank. But the FBI HQ in Washington — a city in which the former secretary of state and first lady wields enormous influence — let the trail go cold. FBI New York Assistant Director in Charge Diego Rodriguez advised agents in Washington to ask Clinton several questions about the foundation, which are reproduced in full in documents released to the Senate Judiciary Committee by the FBI and published on Dec. 15. The questions reveal the concerns about foreign bribery that the Clinton Foundation case — codenamed “Cracked Foundation” — had uncovered." [Hidden Content]

Wow!

To be clear, you brought up the personal attacks and I said I couldn’t do anything about that, only moderators could, I wasn’t calling for more stringent control. For the most part, I have no problem with the job the moderators do here, it’s a fairly hands off approach, with only a few that I can recall that were removed, by their own doing.

Oh…ok I am sure no moderators would do anything like that. Cough Cough Lol

I didn't say that. Was replying to LRF about the personal attacks and violations in this forum and he suggesting the mods handle the business better.

So are you saying there’s moderaters that get to question sources but the moderator is not allowed to be questioned?

Again ill ask you like I ask all knowing bullets what is the go to all truthful source so yall will agree with all post by anyone? If we’re talking about being lazy it sounds like to me the ones that don’t believe a post but refuse to do any research on their own are the lazy ones. They would rather attack the messenger instead of the message. Lol

I agree. I'll start being fair. Also will start doing the job that you suggested. Policing this forum for violations. It seems some of that is not being fairly done down here.

Let’s not forget you questioned me and was derogatory towards me about my post so yes I will get the last word if I want too. Over the years I can’t count how many times I’ve seen someone post a source and you dismiss it because you didn’t like the source so cut the nonsense. You seem to think you are the orbiter of truth and sources which is a joke it self. You seem to get real bent when someone post something off Twitter/X but you have no problem believing 3 letter agencies like the CDC, FBI, DOJ etc. 😂 Your credibility is as solid as your covid post. If you want to talk about legitimate sources. Lol

It’s funny that DCT made post after post after post that was simply AI generated with no sources and not a peep from you or anyone else, which is fine, don’t need the help, lol. Thanks for proving my point again, if us rightys disagree with a post, we post rebuttals. It seems you only get involved in something like this when it’s a Reagan post, never ever seen you challenge some of the ridiculous posts from the leftys. As a moderator, either be fair or simply stay out of it.

But my point was it didn't matter to those on the right where this subject came from. It was something that supported that side, came from a MAGA supporter so therefore all of you guys took it as truth. Not one of you (other than baddog) cared to verify the data. You had no motivation to verify the data because that supports what you support. Just said prove it wrong. Even some said it didn't matter if Elmer Fudd posted the data. I am betting that had a lefty posted, some of you would have provided many sources to either verify or dispute. You would not have taken their word. All I am saying, let's not be so blind. How about posting real sources and not leftwing or rightwing social media influencers.

Is there two of them?

If I find a topic on Fox, I Google the topic to see if it is covered by msm because so many people hate Fox and their conservative lean, they will refuse to believe it, yet Fox still has better numbers than all the other news sources COMBINED. Funny what people will believe and for what reasons.

[Hidden Content]

Thanks for proving my point, she could be right. Look at the information being posted and critique that before simply dismissing the source. I’m not sure why this is so hard.

But who is saying the data is wrong? Maybe she is a blind hog that found an acorn. I just think the subject matter would have more credibility than coming from a social media influencer (self titled btw). The "influencer" part is what sticks out to me. They don't really want to educate, just influence.

Congratulations, from the east coast.

Big time job opening.

Problem solved, they’re not eligible.

So which news sources would you consider a REAL source? Why is it that some “random” lady couldn’t possibly know the facts about something. And you are wrong, if a post is made and you think it’s wrong, don’t simply bash the source, provide evidence that it is wrong.

he is scared of what this women might say. As big as his mouth is and nasty of a personality that he has. he won't say nothing bad about this women.

Trump has the authority to release these files, We all know why he won't