Iran War Update

[baddog]

6 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Obama was president what, almost 15 years ago? The relevance is ???

Thanks for the math lesson. Relevance? The hypocrisy. Never heard a peep back then. Always the fake outrage.

[Boyz N Da Hood]

13 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Obama was president what, almost 15 years ago? The relevance is ???

Its their only go to.. but but but 😂

Its easy to see a conservative from a MAGA these days.. 

[Slim Charles]

24 minutes ago, Porter said:

The definition of faction is a small organized group. 😂

They are just buying time and the more time they get the more it bolds well for them. 
 

No doubt it looks good for Trump to give them 30 chances but this is turning into a dumpster fire.

So exactly what is your argument or point here? That there is no one within Iranian leadership who want a deal and for this to end? You believe Iran is completely unified in it's stance against a deal and they all want war? The entire Iranian leadership is made up of factions, including the IRGC. And you think they are all on the same page? 

[baddog]

21 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

Its their only go to.. but but but 😂

Its easy to see a conservative from a MAGA these days.. 

You’re not even man enough to quote me? Democrats are easily spotted. Pretty much back fighters.

[thetragichippy]

40 minutes ago, Slim Charles said:

So exactly what is your argument or point here? That there is no one within Iranian leadership who want a deal and for this to end? You believe Iran is completely unified in it's stance against a deal and they all want war? The entire Iranian leadership is made up of factions, including the IRGC. And you think they are all on the same page? 

I'd be curious of the argument as well. 

When a leader can't travel one one location to another, I would say there are some issues

[baddog]

7 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

I'd be curious of the argument as well. 

When a leader can't travel one one location to another, I would say there are some issues

They drew straws to get their newest leader.

[Reagan]

2 hours ago, OlDawg said:

No problem. I’ll add you to the ‘Don’t have a clue/political hack list.’

Oh snap! You were already there.

 

I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting that you really believe what you just said! 

[Porter]

2 hours ago, Slim Charles said:

So exactly what is your argument or point here? That there is no one within Iranian leadership who want a deal and for this to end? You believe Iran is completely unified in it's stance against a deal and they all want war? The entire Iranian leadership is made up of factions, including the IRGC. And you think they are all on the same page? 

When we had them against the ropes on the initial strikes they should have went for the kill shot and removed the regime. These prolonged love tabs is not going to do it. The longer this goes without taking the regime out the weaker we look. Keep in mind we are financing this war even with us approaching 40 trillion in debt. Smh

[Porter]

BREAKING: IRAN BURNS. The ceasefire is OVER. Multiple American strikes across the Iranian coast, as the U.S. tries to knock down Iran's ability to control the Strait of Hormuz. Iran is threatening to target American military bases in the region in retaliation.

- Kevin Steele

[UT alum]

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Thanks for the math lesson. Relevance? The hypocrisy. Never heard a peep back then. Always the fake outrage.

If “whatabout” is your best move that’s because you got nothing left in the tank.

[OlDawg]

3 hours ago, Porter said:

Yeah but Trump has given the Israel soldiers superpowers! 😂Smh 

Israel is technologically advanced compared to Iran. But, numbers & sheer geographical area make a full-blown invasion of Iran by Israel a losing proposition--and the Israeli's know it. In addition, the Abraham Accords would be shredded, and the region would be thrown into chaos because the Arab/Muslim States would never accept an invasion strictly by Israel. They tolerate it when the U.S. does it because of common interests and needs. But, that doesn't mean they like it any better.

For perspective, at the height of the operations in Iraq in 2007, the U.S. had about 170,000 military personnel deployed in country. That's the size of Israel's entire active manpower, and only leaves call up reserves for home defense against Hezbollah and Hamas--who would both take the opportunity to hammer Israel for all they're worth. Iran is over 250% bigger in geographical land mass than Iraq.

No. U.S. boots on the ground will be required if boots are utilized. And you can kiss off the Gulf States helping. They won't lift a finger other than in defense, and allowing the U.S. to stage.

NATO? Europeans? Ha! Riiiigggghhhttt...

[Reagan]

29 minutes ago, UT alum said:

If “whatabout” is your best move that’s because you got nothing left in the tank.

Facts are a stubborn son-of-a-gun!  

[baddog]

39 minutes ago, UT alum said:

If “whatabout” is your best move that’s because you got nothing left in the tank.

Yeah, I know, liberals don’t like being called out on their hypocrisy. It has nothing to do with running out of ammo. I have an entire thread dedicated to showing the hypocrisy of the left. Plenty of ammo left. I see you got a like from hood boy, so you should be proud. He always answers my post with someone who quoted me, something he can’t do. Lmao

[Reagan]

 

 

[OlDawg]

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

 

 

About time. I talked about this route weeks ago. Good job.

[baddog]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Porter]

Lol

 

[baddog]

Our technology is second to none. Our troops are fighting for us on a world stage. 
 

 

[DCT]

13 hours ago, Porter said:

Lol

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 Trump is. Clearly not fit to run this country. 

Funny but not. SMH

[baddog]

Who played whom?

 

[Reagan]

5 hours ago, DCT said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 Trump is. Clearly not fit to run this country. 

Funny but not. SMH

It’s interesting how you have to find a foreign website to condemn your President!  🤦‍♂️

[Porter]

3 hours ago, baddog said:

Who played whom?

 

Lol, per Grok. Like I said we’re still being played. He’s not playing 9D chess like you think so.

No, this is not true—it’s sensationalized hype, likely from a clickbait video or post.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

The core claims (a “secret geopolitical chess move” by the US and Oman that stripped Iran of its Hormuz leverage, trapping them with a surrender-or-global-war ultimatum while the world was distracted by “ceasefire headlines”) do not match available reporting. Here’s the actual context as of mid-2026:

Background on the Strait of Hormuz situation

•  The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments. Iran has long claimed significant influence and has threatened or disrupted shipping during tensions.

•  There was a US-Iran war or major conflict phase earlier in 2026, followed by a fragile memorandum of understanding (MoU)/ceasefire framework in June that aimed to reopen the strait for normal (toll-free) commercial traffic.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

•  Tensions flared again recently: Iran (or elements acting in its name) attacked vessels in/near the strait, violating the understanding. The US responded with strikes on Iranian targets, declared the ceasefire “over” (while agreeing to continued talks at Iran’s request), and reinforced naval presence.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Trump’s statements and US position

Trump has repeatedly stated that the strait must remain open to everyone as international waters, with no single country controlling it. The US has positioned forces to “watch over” it, helped facilitate ship transits (including “Project Freedom” and reported secret operations moving oil), issued sanctions, and set deadlines/ultimatums for Iran to stop attacks on shipping.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is public rhetoric and policy, not a hidden revelation.

Oman’s role

Oman (a neutral mediator with ties to both sides) has hosted or facilitated talks. Iranian and Omani officials have discussed “safe passage” mechanisms, bilateral issues, and possible joint arrangements for the strait. There have been proposals involving fees/service charges (which the US opposes for an international waterway) and coordination along Omani routes.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is diplomatic mediation and bilateral talks, not a secret US-Oman plot to “strip” Iran’s leverage. Shipping has continued with risks, US naval support, and alternative routing emphasis.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

The “ultimatum”

The US is demanding Iran publicly affirm the strait is open and stop shooting at ships as a condition for de-escalation. Talks continue in Oman. Iran has pushed back, cited errors or factions, and insists on its rights/sovereignty. No credible reports describe Iran as “trapped with nowhere to turn” or facing an all-or-nothing choice that inevitably triggers “devastating all-out global war.”

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Why the claim is misleading

•  Exaggerated drama: Ceasefire violations, strikes, and talks are ongoing and reported—not a “hidden maneuver” while the world was distracted.

•  No evidence of a game-changing secret deal: US-Oman coordination exists in the context of mediation and freedom-of-navigation operations. Iran’s leverage is reduced by military pressure and parallel routing, but it retains territorial waters, rhetoric, and some disruption capability.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

•  Typical clickbait framing: These posts often mix real tensions (Hormuz incidents, Trump statements, Oman talks) with conspiracy-style hype to imply imminent catastrophe or genius 4D chess.

Real risks exist—disruptions to energy markets, escalation potential, and fragile diplomacy—but the situation is fluid negotiations backed by military posturing, not a cornered Iran on the brink of world war. Mainstream coverage (from multiple outlets) reflects this without the apocalyptic spin.

[DCT]

3 hours ago, Reagan said:

It’s interesting how you have to find a foreign website to condemn your President!  🤦‍♂️

Did your 👑say it or not?

Fixed it.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Porter]