SCOTUS Rules Against Trump Administration IEEPA Tariffs

[UT alum]

15 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

From the President:

 

“Although I firmly disagree with the court's holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president's ability to order tariffs going forward."

"That's because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case. Even more tariffs."

 

 The Supreme Court DID NOT overrule Tariffs; they merely overruled a particular use of IEEPA Tariffs." 
 

This is far from over…..

The other means have too many strings. That’s why he went the IEEPA way. The 10% across the board he spoke of can only be in effect for 150 days, requiring congressional permission to extend beyond that time. Trump don’t like to ask permission.

[thetragichippy]

9 minutes ago, UT alum said:

The other means have too many strings. That’s why he went the IEEPA way. The 10% across the board he spoke of can only be in effect for 150 days, requiring congressional permission to extend beyond that time. Trump don’t like to ask permission.

There is a list of others….not over by a long shot

[Reagan]

 

 

[baddog]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

I’m guessing refunds will require another lawsuit

He. What money were you talking about? Trump was asked during his press conference about refunding the money. He said it wasn’t addressed. His press conference wasn’t on The View, so you probably d it. 

[Reagan]

 

Doesn't look like much will change.  

[UT alum]

18 minutes ago, baddog said:

He. What money were you talking about? Trump was asked during his press conference about refunding the money. He said it wasn’t addressed. His press conference wasn’t on The View, so you probably d it. 

I listened to his lying mouth to my ear. Money wasn’t addressed because that was t the cause of action. How many times I have to tell you? I don’t watch talking heads.

[UT alum]

16 minutes ago, Reagan said:

 

Doesn't look like much will change.  

Oh yeah, it will. Now he’ll have to follow rules and/or or work with Congress. No more dictatorial moves, and little Donnie doesn’t play well with others.

[baddog]

7 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I listened to his lying mouth to my ear. Money wasn’t addressed because that was t the cause of action. How many times I have to tell you? I don’t watch talking heads.

Then why did you ask?

[baddog]

All you Trump haters…..Trump is a very sharp individual. Always know he has a plan “B”.

[baddog]

Hypocrites…..

Google search:

President Biden maintained most of the trade tariffs on Chinese goods initiated during the Trump administration, even increasing duties on items like electric vehicles and semiconductors

. Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi previously advocated for using tariffs to counter China's market influence, despite criticizing specific, broader tariff implementations. 

Representative Nancy Pelosi | (.gov) +3

Key Details on Tariff Policies

• Biden Administration: President Biden left many of the 2018-2019 China tariffs in place to protect U.S. industries and address unfair trade practices. His administration further increased duties on, among other things, solar cells, aluminum, steel, and, most notably, quadrupled tariffs on electric vehicles.
• Nancy Pelosi: While Pelosi criticized the Trump administration's "chaotic" approach to tariffs as a "self-inflicted disaster" that harmed consumers, she previously supported targeted, "smart" tariffs to address unfair trade practices, particularly regarding China.
• Contextual Shift: Critics and observers noted that some Democrats, including Pelosi, historically advocated for reciprocal trade measures against China, which mirrors the protectionist rhetoric later heavily utilized by the Trump administration. 
  Facebook +6

While Biden and Pelosi often criticized the methods of the previous administration's trade policy, they did not remove the majority of the protective trade barriers