Crosby (26) A&M Consolidated (27) — FINAL

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

1 minute ago, Cougar14.2 said:

If we don’t get a Stepp Bomb before Christmas tonight I might go ahead and check into AA🤷🏾‍♂️

Damn 💀🤣

[Cougar14.2]

14 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Damn 💀🤣

Crazy amount of individual talent about to come through the program in the next 5 years and we have two years before we go to 6A. I’m hoping the administration gets serious about winning before we can’t. 

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

2 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Crazy amount of individual talent about to come through the program in the next 5 years and we have two years before we go to 6A. I’m hoping the administration gets serious about winning before we can’t. 

I understand you bruh. You been calling most of this stuff for years. 

[MrFleet23]

12 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Crazy amount of individual talent about to come through the program in the next 5 years and we have two years before we go to 6A. I’m hoping the administration gets serious about winning before we can’t. 

Definitely got some talent coming Clint LaDay is HIM but IDK if it’s enough to run it with NS, SC, and King. 

[Justafan72]

Crosby resume : Returning QB,Both OTs,2 young,very Talented RBs,2 or 3 wrs,plus 5 or 6 return on defense.And the usual transfer line Crosby has always enjoyed from their 6A neighbors.Do these kids a favor Administration and redecorate the sideline.Love to see the list of coaches who would love to move into that field house. 

[Cougtalk]

Three losing seasons, 2 back to back first round exits, non-competitive with the top of the district. 
 

This is not Crosby football it feels like I'm watching PAM from 6-7 years ago? All that talent being wasted.

[pakronos]

9 hours ago, Cougtalk said:

Three losing seasons, 2 back to back first round exits, non-competitive with the top of the district. 
 

This is not Crosby football it feels like I'm watching PAM from 6-7 years ago? All that talent being wasted.

with the first rd exits, yes. But no losing seasons. This year it seems Morgan has finally got it. Keep it simple. Now, as a MAN, i disagreed during the summer that my cousin should be playing QB and i was wrong and it worked out. But i haven't seen a lot of, maybe no clock management issues, maybe one. Play calling hasn't been bad, i'll give him/them an A-, probably because the talent can hide any bad play calling? Idk, maybe the community needs to be more vocal and make crosby's HC feel uncomfortable? I honestly believe that Morgan has heard voices and want to go out with a bang if the rumors are true.

[Matthew328]

If Crosby went for two and got it....would everyone still be mad about the call?? 

It very nearly worked, took a great play by the Consol defense to hold the QB out of the end zone....I dont mind a coach trusting his kids to go win the game there, espeically as a road underdog....same thing for Friendswood who was in the exact same scenario except they were on the 3 and not the 1.5 yard line..

Seems like Crosby has gotten better each of the last 3 years....4 of the 6 losses this year were by one score...

[CCRed]

6 hours ago, Matthew328 said:

If Crosby went for two and got it....would everyone still be mad about the call?? 

It very nearly worked, took a great play by the Consol defense to hold the QB out of the end zone....I dont mind a coach trusting his kids to go win the game there, espeically as a road underdog....same thing for Friendswood who was in the exact same scenario except they were on the 3 and not the 1.5 yard line..

Seems like Crosby has gotten better each of the last 3 years....4 of the 6 losses this year were by one score...

In that situation, I would not have gone for two. Crosby had 1st and goal from the 4 yard line. It took them 4 downs to get that 4 yards for a TD.  So no, I wouldn’t have trusted the play calling or offense on one play. 

[Cougtalk]

9 hours ago, Matthew328 said:

If Crosby went for two and got it....would everyone still be mad about the call?? 

It very nearly worked, took a great play by the Consol defense to hold the QB out of the end zone....I dont mind a coach trusting his kids to go win the game there, espeically as a road underdog....same thing for Friendswood who was in the exact same scenario except they were on the 3 and not the 1.5 yard line..

Seems like Crosby has gotten better each of the last 3 years....4 of the 6 losses this year were by one score...

It would have still objectively been a bad call and it's a bad call because you took the certain points off the board. Not sure where you come from but where i come from we were always taught a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. If he had originally decided to go for 2 to win it (Like Friendswood did) and lost then that fine, but when you have a tie game you cannot untie the game to try and go for two everything about the decision was nonsense, if he had succeeded we would of course be happy with a second round game, but it would have still been the objectively incorrect decision. I asked a buddy who does some stats work for Northwestern what the data says and his exact words were nothing is more statistically valuable then guaranteed points. So under no old coach model (traditional) or stats model (modern) is this the correct call to make. Also, grandpa knew better and he never coached a day in his life but had more life experience than any of these coaches dreamed of having. 

 

 

[gary-us-bonds]

On 11/14/2025 at 11:04 PM, MrFleet23 said:

Definitely got some talent coming Clint LaDay is HIM but IDK if it’s enough to run it with NS, SC, and King. 

Got any laday highlights?

[Matthew328]

12 hours ago, Cougtalk said:

It would have still objectively been a bad call and it's a bad call because you took the certain points off the board. Not sure where you come from but where i come from we were always taught a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. If he had originally decided to go for 2 to win it (Like Friendswood did) and lost then that fine, but when you have a tie game you cannot untie the game to try and go for two everything about the decision was nonsense, if he had succeeded we would of course be happy with a second round game, but it would have still been the objectively incorrect decision. I asked a buddy who does some stats work for Northwestern what the data says and his exact words were nothing is more statistically valuable then guaranteed points. So under no old coach model (traditional) or stats model (modern) is this the correct call to make. Also, grandpa knew better and he never coached a day in his life but had more life experience than any of these coaches dreamed of having. 

 

 

I always feel like there's plenty of variables at play in these things....honestly going for 2 originally seems like the right call...underdog on the road...steal a win...my guess is Willis was on the fence and then penalty and the extra 1.5 yards pushed him to give it a shot.....in vaccum guaranteed points are always safest...but in the scenario where 1 more point from 1.5 yards and its game over vs taking your chances in OT those statistical models may change 

[gary-us-bonds]

13 hours ago, gary-us-bonds said:

Got any laday highlights?

Nevermind. Found them on hudl against Cunningham. Kid is going to be special.