Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, Reagan said:

 

Amazingly good point!  

@UT alum  You have to agree!

It’s only the beginning, looks like. This is what will happen when the military becomes involved in civil enforcement. It’s not politics. It’s the beginning of authoritarianism and the beginning of the end of our Constitution if people like you don’t wake from your fever dreams.

Posted
40 minutes ago, UT alum said:

It’s only the beginning, looks like. This is what will happen when the military becomes involved in civil enforcement. It’s not politics. It’s the beginning of authoritarianism and the beginning of the end of our Constitution if people like you don’t wake from your fever dreams.

This is what happens when democrats are in control. Sanctuary cities protecting illegal criminals, when they should be protecting real Americans. Where does it say that in the Constitution? You are ate up with it.

 

Posted
2 hours ago, baddog said:

This is what happens when democrats are in control. Sanctuary cities protecting illegal criminals, when they should be protecting real Americans. Where does it say that in the Constitution? You are ate up with it.

 

Military does not have domestic enforcement power unless there is insurrection. The Weasel is using fear and prejudice to gin something up to call insurrection. It is unconstitutional to call in the military for protests. The Guard can be requested by a governor to quell riots. If the President starts making the calls, authoritarianism is right around the corner. If you don’t agree with Dear Leader, you’ll be going to jail or worse. You don’t realize what’s happening. Ignore the courts, select the journalists, threaten the judges, ignore Congress with executive orders, military parades on his birthday. I could go on. Hello. Is there anybody in there?

Posted
30 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Military does not have domestic enforcement power unless there is insurrection. The Weasel is using fear and prejudice to gin something up to call insurrection. It is unconstitutional to call in the military for protests. The Guard can be requested by a governor to quell riots. If the President starts making the calls, authoritarianism is right around the corner. If you don’t agree with Dear Leader, you’ll be going to jail or worse. You don’t realize what’s happening. Ignore the courts, select the journalists, threaten the judges, ignore Congress with executive orders, military parades on his birthday. I could go on. Hello. Is there anybody in there?

Your attempt at schooling everyone has failed miserably. Look up the definition of an insurrection. Just because California has a bunch of dweebs running things, doesn’t mean Trump is not within his rights. Trump is not coming after you or me so stop with the fear mongering. It’s what the dems are good at and it has a great effect on the weak minded. Your journalists are self destructing by the droves. Couldn’t possibly be that they were wrong. You hate dictators yet you follow behind a single judge’s order. I do remember your Schumer idol threatening S.C. Judges. The military parade on Saturday was the U.S. Army’s birthday. I could go on. Stop plagiarizing my Pink Floyd reference. 
 

So you do believe that illegals mean more than real Americans. Pick up a rock and throw it at a cop. Maybe you could loot a big screen.

Posted
12 minutes ago, baddog said:

Your attempt at schooling everyone has failed miserably. Look up the definition of an insurrection. Just because California has a bunch of dweebs running things, doesn’t mean Trump is not within his rights. Trump is not coming after you or me so stop with the fear mongering. It’s what the dems are good at and it has a great effect on the weak minded. Your journalists are self destructing by the droves. Couldn’t possibly be that they were wrong. You hate dictators yet you follow behind a single judge’s order. I do remember your Schumer idol threatening S.C. Judges. The military parade on Saturday was the U.S. Army’s birthday. I could go on. Stop plagiarizing my Pink Floyd reference. 
 

So you do believe that illegals mean more than real Americans. Pick up a rock and throw it at a cop. Maybe you could loot a big screen.

This is the hidden content, please

This is the statute Weasel used to federalize the National Guard. We are not being invaded by a foreign nation. There is no insurrection threatening our government. The LA protesters were complimented by local authorities on Thursday for keeping it orderly, so the President was having no trouble executing the laws. He used a dubious code to keep on dividing us as a nation. He is making his move to become king and you all are applauding him.

Posted
16 minutes ago, UT alum said:

This is the hidden content, please

This is the statute Weasel used to federalize the National Guard. We are not being invaded by a foreign nation. There is no insurrection threatening our government. The LA protesters were complimented by local authorities on Thursday for keeping it orderly, so the President was having no trouble executing the laws. He used a dubious code to keep on dividing us as a nation. He is making his move to become king and you all are applauding him.

I addressed all of your post. You addressed none of mine, and you call yourself a debater. Typical lib.

Here’s your definition: An insurrection is a violent uprising against established authority, typically a government. It involves organized, often armed, resistance, aiming to overthrow or change the existing power structure. Insurrections can also be directed against specific laws or policies. 

Posted
32 minutes ago, baddog said:

I addressed all of your post. You addressed none of mine, and you call yourself a debater. Typical lib.

Here’s your definition: An insurrection is a violent uprising against established authority, typically a government. It involves organized, often armed, resistance, aiming to overthrow or change the existing power structure. Insurrections can also be directed against specific laws or policies. 

It wasn’t an argument. It was a collection of opinions. You even went so far as to accuse me of plagiarizing your plagiarism. Can’t argue with that crazy thinking. 
This is how the Father of our Country saw it. Read it then let’s try another debate.

This is the hidden content, please

36 minutes ago, baddog said:

I addressed all of your post. You addressed none of mine, and you call yourself a debater. Typical lib.

Here’s your definition: An insurrection is a violent uprising against established authority, typically a government. It involves organized, often armed, resistance, aiming to overthrow or change the existing power structure. Insurrections can also be directed against specific laws or policies. 

So, where’s the insurrection against the Federal government in Los Angeles?

Posted
43 minutes ago, baddog said:

I addressed all of your post. You addressed none of mine, and you call yourself a debater. Typical lib.

Here’s your definition: An insurrection is a violent uprising against established authority, typically a government. It involves organized, often armed, resistance, aiming to overthrow or change the existing power structure. Insurrections can also be directed against specific laws or policies. 

An absolute waste of time, baddog.

Posted
4 minutes ago, UT alum said:

It wasn’t an argument. It was a collection of opinions. You even went so far as to accuse me of plagiarizing your plagiarism. Can’t argue with that crazy thinking. 
This is how the Father of our Country saw it. Read it then let’s try another debate.

This is the hidden content, please

So, where’s the insurrection against the Federal government in Los Angeles?

Not leading you by the hand like big girl. You are obviously not an American if you cover for these violent rioters and looters, plus you back hamas.

Posted
2 hours ago, baddog said:

Not leading you by the hand like big girl. You are obviously not an American if you cover for these violent rioters and looters, plus you back hamas.

I don’t back rioters or Hamas. I back the right to protest (free speech) and I back the right of the Palestinians to their own homeland. Weasel’s in your head. Telling me I’m not an American because you don’t agree with me. That in itself is un-American. Shame on you.

Posted
9 hours ago, UT alum said:

I don’t back rioters or Hamas. I back the right to protest (free speech) and I back the right of the Palestinians to their own homeland. Weasel’s in your head. Telling me I’m not an American because you don’t agree with me. That in itself is un-American. Shame on you.

What’s your definition of protest?

Posted
10 hours ago, UT alum said:

I don’t back rioters or Hamas. I back the right to protest (free speech) and I back the right of the Palestinians to their own homeland. Weasel’s in your head. Telling me I’m not an American because you don’t agree with me. That in itself is un-American. Shame on you.

The bottom line is he is bringing in the national guard to protect federal buildings and the ICE staff. He was not going to have a redo of the 2020 burning of buildings. These "protestors" were impeding ICE from doing their job.  That has been resolved......

@UT alum - What is the budget you give protestors for breaking windows, busting up concrete curbs with hammers to throw at cops, burning vehicles and looting?  The reason I ask is because that all has happened in the past week.....

BUT Newsom has it under control🤣

Posted
3 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

The bottom line is he is bringing in the national guard to protect federal buildings and the ICE staff. He was not going to have a redo of the 2020 burning of buildings. These "protestors" were impeding ICE from doing their job.  That has been resolved......

@UT alum - What is the budget you give protestors for breaking windows, busting up concrete curbs with hammers to throw at cops, burning vehicles and looting?  The reason I ask is because that all has happened in the past week.....

BUT Newsom has it under control🤣

Oh, I don’t know. Once they break into the Capitol, kill a few cops and destroy government property and deface the nation’s seat of power, we’ll talk. 
Four in LA have been charged with felony destruction of government property and assault of law enforcement officers. 
This is what authoritarianism looks like. Pardon your supporters and throw the book at your opponents for the same crimes. Sickening.

Posted
4 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

I'd also like to know his definition of free speech.....

I have a feeling he is confusing vandalism with protest.... 

You are outside your mind. Same crimes as Jan. 5 protesters, but I’m confused?

Posted
23 hours ago, UT alum said:

It’s only the beginning, looks like. This is what will happen when the military becomes involved in civil enforcement. It’s not politics. It’s the beginning of authoritarianism and the beginning of the end of our Constitution if people like you don’t wake from your fever dreams.

You watched the View this morning.  SMH!

Posted
33 minutes ago, UT alum said:

You are outside your mind. Same crimes as Jan. 5 protesters, but I’m confused?

How long was the riot on the Capitol? One event about 5 hours total. People were arrested for just being present......

How many days has this went on?  How many vehicles burned? How many stores looted?

And if Pelosi would of took trumps advice, he offered 10,000 National Guard to be on standby......

Not close to the same

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    ben broussard
    Newest Member
    ben broussard
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...