Breaking News - TRUMP to release EPSTEIN files and client list!

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, mat said:

There's plenty of smoking guns out there without factual confirmation, primarily because of this administration's stonewalling. Could Trump have people to protect? You decide for yourself.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Donald Trump Jr. reportedly met Jeffrey Epstein months before financier’s death

No where in the article that reads like The National Inquire by the way, does it state Jr. MET with Epstein.  This is typical click bait, and because of you, I clicked it to verify.  Your headline is a lie right off the bat.

Also, it was reported on X by Ed Krassenstein.....who is a social influencer....and guess how he gets paid......CLICKS - he post outrageous stuff and gets paid by how many people click on it.  He purposely trolls Trump and makes a fortune. 

[LumRaiderFan]

7 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Donald Trump Jr. reportedly met Jeffrey Epstein months before financier’s death

No where in the article that reads like The National Inquire by the way, does it state Jr. MET with Epstein.  This is typical click bait, and because of you, I clicked it to verify.  Your headline is a lie right off the bat.

Also, it was reported on X by Ed Krassenstein.....who is a social influencer....and guess how he gets paid......CLICKS - he post outrageous stuff and gets paid by how many people click on it.  He purposely trolls Trump and makes a fortune. 

Headlines that lead with “reportedly”, “it’s alleged” and “according to an anonymous source” have skyrocketed in the Trump era. 

[baddog]

11 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Headlines that lead with “reportedly”, “it’s alleged” and “according to an anonymous source” have skyrocketed in the Trump era. 

Would that be to prevent a lawsuit?

[Reagan]

 

I also agree!

[LumRaiderFan]

5 minutes ago, baddog said:

Would that be to prevent a lawsuit?

That’s probably part of it, but they also know those news snippets are all that’s required for many to run with it like it’s proven facts, the proof is on this very site.

Folks throw out unproven news articles and expect you to condemn someone based on it and if you don’t, you must approve of the “alleged” behavior.

 

[DCT]

17 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

That’s probably part of it, but they also know those news snippets are all that’s required for many to run with it like it’s proven facts, the proof is on this very site.

Folks throw out unproven news articles and expect you to condemn someone based on it and if you don’t, you must approve of the “alleged” behavior.

 

Sounds a lot like this administration.  Remember the ICE shooting of the alleged domestic terrorist.

[LumRaiderFan]

1 minute ago, DCT said:

Sounds a lot like this administration.  Remember the ICE shooting of the alleged domestic terrorist.

This isn’t about the Epstein mess or the victims for you, it’s 100% get Trump, that’s it.

 

[thetragichippy]

4 minutes ago, DCT said:

 Remember the ICE shooting of the alleged domestic terrorist.

Are you talking about the guy a week or two prior was vandalizing a government vehicle? 

I do remember that shooting.  I still believe there will be no charges filed.  

[DCT]

1 minute ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This isn’t about the Epstein mess or the victims for you, it’s 100% get Trump, that’s it.

 

Keep telling yourself that.  You can care less about what the victims have to say.  You are more worried about what is on a t-shirt.

[DCT]

4 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Are you talking about the guy a week or two prior was vandalizing a government vehicle? 

I do remember that shooting.  I still believe there will be no charges filed.  

Talking about a woman using the pseudonym Katie Johnson who alleges in 2016 Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epatein raped her at a party in 1994 when she was 13 years old.

[LumRaiderFan]

12 minutes ago, DCT said:

Keep telling yourself that.  You can care less about what the victims have to say.  You are more worried about what is on a t-shirt.

Lol, good one. 🙄

[LumRaiderFan]

7 minutes ago, DCT said:

Talking about a woman using the pseudonym Katie Johnson who alleges in 2016 Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epatein raped her at a party in 1994 when she was 13 years old.

🤦‍♂️ 

[Reagan]

18 minutes ago, DCT said:

Talking about a woman using the pseudonym Katie Johnson who alleges in 2016 Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epatein raped her at a party in 1994 when she was 13 years old.

I don't believe the Trump part.  But why are we just now hearing about?  Why didn't she say anything about it then?  Same thing with that other woman who said Trump raped her in a department store 30 years ago.  He gets elected and you don't hear anymore about it.  

[thetragichippy]

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

🤦‍♂️

Yeah, not even worth a response

[OlDawg]

2 hours ago, DCT said:

Talking about a woman using the pseudonym Katie Johnson who alleges in 2016 Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epatein raped her at a party in 1994 when she was 13 years old.

This Katie Johnson? 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

[OlDawg]

Trump has his pros & cons. Just like any POTUS. But, some of y’all are hoping to find something negative so bad, you’re not even taking a couple minutes to check the veracity of claims. It’s making you look really foolish.

[DCT]

8 minutes ago, OlDawg said:

Trump has his pros & cons. Just like any POTUS. But, some of y’all are hoping to find something negative so bad, you’re not even taking a couple minutes to check the veracity of claims. It’s making you look really foolish.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[DCT]

2 minutes ago, DCT said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Bondi looked foolish with all her deflections and her references to the stock market. Patel looked foolish with his blatant lies, saying Trump appeared in the Epstein files fewer than 100 times. This administration wants to move on. The allegations are in the newly released Epstein file. It says nothing about a 35 million payoff. You may want to check your source.

[OlDawg]

1 minute ago, DCT said:

Bondi looked foolish with all her deflections and her references to the stock market. Patel looked foolish with his blatant lies, saying Trump appeared in the Epstein files fewer than 100 times. This administration wants to move on. The allegations are in the newly released Epstein file. It says nothing about a 35 million payoff. You may want to check your source.

The source is fine. You referenced the pseudonym Katie Johnson. I gave you the information on that.

[LumRaiderFan]

13 minutes ago, DCT said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Your posts are becoming more and more ridiculous.

[DCT]

Just now, LumRaiderFan said:

Your posts are becoming more and more ridiculous.

 

[OlDawg]

Just now, DCT said:

 

Katie Johnson

Give it up already.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

[DCT]

10 minutes ago, OlDawg said:

Katie Johnson

Give it up already.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

It's not going anywhere.  Only 2% released and victims statements are still redacted.  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Porter]

 

[OlDawg]

18 minutes ago, DCT said:

It's not going anywhere.  Only 2% released and victims statements are still redacted.  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

There are very serious accusations in the file dumps. But, the U.N. Human Rights Council is a joke.

The U.N. Secretary General was going to congratulate Iran at the upcoming meeting of the U.N. until severe backlash.

I have a hard time giving any credibility to an organization that was going to recognize and congratulate a known terrorist State.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up