Jump to content

Shooting Of U of Virginia Football Players


Hagar

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Hagar said:

No idea why, but what a shame to have three young men cut down in the prime of life.  Really folks, look at the results of taking prayer out of school?  No doubt other factors, but durn, killing folks is not the answer.

This is the hidden content, please

I believe he was a disgruntled ex-player. All those he shot were teammates. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/14/2022 at 5:31 PM, Hagar said:

No idea why, but what a shame to have three young men cut down in the prime of life.  Really folks, look at the results of taking prayer out of school?  No doubt other factors, but durn, killing folks is not the answer.

This is the hidden content, please

Prayers for those families.  And speaking of prayers, I recently went to an LSU football game and they had a “moment of reflection” where a student prayed over the stadium speaker system before the game.  Gotta tell you, there weren’t many sober in that stadium that night but the fact they still pray before games?  I became more of a Tiger fan that night.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, TxHoops said:

Prayers for those families.  And speaking of prayers, I recently went to an LSU football game and they had a “moment of reflection” where a student prayed over the stadium speaker system before the game.  Gotta tell you, there weren’t many sober in that stadium that night but the fact they still pray before games?  I became more of a Tiger fan that night.  

LSU's been kind of a mess lately with institutional control issues, but they should be applauded for this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bulldogs92 said:

LSU's been kind of a mess lately with institutional control issues, but they should be applauded for this. 

I almost fell out of my chair.  I asked the folks I was with when the young man finished, “did we actually just have a prayer at a major college football game.” (LSU was playing Bama).  And the fact that it was so shocking is a sad commentary on our society.  I tend to agree with my buddy @Hagar and wonder how many of society’s ills can be traced to this absence.  And while I do believe in separation of church and state (everyone should have right to choose their own religion or no religion), we are also  supposed to be “one nation under God.”   And a non-denominational prayer at Death Valley was unbelievably refreshing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

I almost fell out of my chair.  I asked the folks I was with when the young man finished, “did we actually just have a prayer at a major college football game.” (LSU was playing Bama).  And the fact that it was so shocking is a sad commentary on our society.  I tend to agree with my buddy @Hagar and wonder how many of society’s ills can be traced to this absence.  And while I do believe in separation of church and state (everyone should have right to choose their own religion or no religion), we are also  supposed to be “one nation under God.”   And a non-denominational prayer at Death Valley was unbelievably refreshing. 

You’re correct.  And while it’s not the only thing, the fact that it’s been pushed high on the Socialist agenda indicates how much it’ll help their efforts.  And yes old buddy, it is a sad commentary.  An extremely sad commentary.  A sign of the end being near?  Wouldn’t go that far, but I wouldn’t discount it out of hand either.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,937
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 3 yrs ago LCM and Vidor played in Vidor for a play in game.  Game was on a Saturday and started around 1 or 2p.
    • It would shock me beyond belief if he tried to. Now, I hope and pray he appoints people that will investigate, charge, and imprison anyone found guilty of the crimes against him...including treason. I would be all for a special task force charge solely with the task of investigating crimes against Trump. Of course the Democrats will be screaming bloody murder that Trump is weaponizing the government against them. We all know the story. From a cursory standpoint, there seems to be a plethora of evidence to lock up many Democrats for a long time. Unless this is done, I see no end to destruction of our political system...and this country.
    • There is a difference, but I wouldn't at all put it past Trump to do so if he had the infrastructure in place to get away with it like the Dems currently do.  With the amount of effort he's invested in ruining those republicans who've opposed him, it wouldn't surprise me one bit.
    • I think it will be an interesting case and could potentially come up for appeal on a different constitutional point.  The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that the government doesn’t have to take possession of property in order to take it under the meaning of the Fifth Amendment.  If they take away the enjoyment or use of the property, it is no different than physically seizing it to build a highway for example. In a lawsuit as opposed to a criminal trial, a person/plaintiff doesn’t have to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt but rather by a preponderance of evidence or “more likely” to have happened. Maybe it could be described as more likely yes than no or 51%-49%.  ”IF” it can be shown at a trial by a preponderance of evidence that Texas more likely yes than no caused the flooding with its engineering of the project, the people suing might have a case. But…. Does that alone win the case under the Fifth Amendment taking clause? I am not so sure. In US v Causby the Supreme Court ruled that the US government took a man’s property by flying airplanes over it. It was a public airport lawfully leased by the US in WWII and used to fly heavy bombers from it. Causby had an egg farm and the extremely loud noise of some airplanes under full power and sometimes at night with a landing lights being so close, it bothered and scared the family and damaged his egg farm production. Some chickens died and some quit laying eggs due to the extreme disturbances and lights at night. The Supreme Court ruled in Causby’s favor saying that the US had taken away the enjoyment and use of his land even though they didn’t physically seize it. The use of the land was hampered and that was enough for the taking clause under the Fifth Amendment. So in the IH-10 case, did Texas take away the use or enjoyment of the property?  A point of Causby was that the military bombers at a public airport was certainly for “public use”. The planes were public/taxpayers’ and the airport and lease were taxpayers’ property so the “public” definitely used it   My question in this lawsuit against Texas, even in they can prove the damage, was the damage (like in Causby) for “public use”? If not would it then not be a Fifth Amendment case but rather a state law case?  If Texas law denies such a lawsuit under state sovereignty and the families can’t prove a Fifth Amendment case of “public use”, could they prove the damages but still lose the case under state law? I haven’t read that anywhere and just thinking out loud. I could be way off base. But I think it could be interesting…..
    • Both sides...that is, everyone tries to get their people elected. Trump has not weaponized the government to bankrupt and imprison his political opponents. Night and day difference for me.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...