Jump to content

Lumberton 31 Columbus 19/ FINAL


Aggieswife

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

I agree. I was surprised myself, and happy for the boys that they were able to prove everyone wrong.

I probably won’t go to a Lumberton game but I don’t see them beating Vidor, Huffman, Livingston and LCM. They have shot at beating the rest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ain’t no one beating their chest after one game! You can agree with the HC hire or disagree with the hire. Believe your tax $$$ are being wasted etc. But one thing is for certain. We have to get behind the HC and his team and buy into what he is selling to give his program a chance. This is a young team with years ahead of them. A lot of opportunity for growth and experience to be learned this year. But if you don’t go into each game believing your have a chance to win, you’re already defeated. This is my last son to go through the program and I have this year and 2 more. I, just like many, believe we will see improvement each game and are excited to see the growth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, raideroldtimer said:

I think I'm going to start a petition and go before the school board. I think it's high time we change the Lumberton Raiders name to  the Lumberton Red Headed Step Children. I mean, y'all just ain't happy unless they are getting beat.

Barbers Hill feels your pain. BH = the most hated team / school in SETX. 

I wonder why so many take shots at Lumberton and BH? Think about it, LOL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

Ain’t nobody “Taking shots” at Lumberton. People (including me) were saying they wouldn’t beat Columbus because what Columbus had coming back. So if you pick Lumberton to lose apparently you hate them lol

I guess Lumberton has been pretty soft in football. I don’t see hating them. But your past usually predicts your future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raideroldtimer said:

Unfortunately, I even picked us to lose this game for some reason, but the difference between Lumberton, Vidor and Barbers Hill is people expect Lumberton to lose.

Not to be rude but the reason why people expect Lumberton to lose  is because Lumberton is currently 37th in the state with lowest winning percentage 189-355-4=3448 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...