Jump to content

Vidor 10 Santa Fe 0/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

That stadium had a north wind blowing straight through the field endzone to endzone like you wouldn’t believe. It was interesting watching the brigs march while trying to hold onto their flags that were getting thrashed in the wind. Glad to get out of there with a W, you could just tell there wasn’t going to be much scoring going on. This district is wide open BH has the edge for a probable DC but 2-4 who knows. If Vidor ends in a tie with Crosby and PNG it could come down to point differential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boneyard Boys said:

That stadium had a north wind blowing straight through the field endzone to endzone like you wouldn’t believe. It was interesting watching the brigs march while trying to hold onto their flags that were getting thrashed in the wind. Glad to get out of there with a W, you could just tell there wasn’t going to be much scoring going on. This district is wide open BH has the edge for a probable DC but 2-4 who knows. If Vidor ends in a tie with Crosby and PNG it could come down to point differential.

I have no idea how they do that point differential, but my math would have PNG & Vidor going (P&V +2 - C -4) If that’s how they do it.  But hey, get them Pirates ready for BH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

I said last year that Sante Fe had the best game plan  on both sides of the ball that I have ever seen against Vidor. They just knew how to exploit every weakness that we had, even more so then any of our normal opponents. That 2018 Sante Fe vs Vidor game is the blueprint on how to beat Vidor. I'm just glad they got rid of that spread offense or we would have lost last night.

      Vidors defense is the teams strength and I'm glad to see emphasis being put on the defense for a change. I would like to think our offense was holding back so they didn't show too much to Barbers Hill  but I don't think that is the case at all.  If we had  a decent offense to go along with this defense we would be dangerous.

Agreed.  And isn’t it ironic that over recent years, Vidor has scored 20, 30, and 40 points and lost because the opponents have scored 30, 40 and 50 points.  Still, the Pirates, picked in the bottom two of Dist by many, have been a pleasant surprise.  It’d be nice if they got it all going the rest of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,988
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CougarCrazy124
    Newest Member
    CougarCrazy124
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Baytown Lee for a qb I heard… 
    • Shall not be infringed was not even an issue in this case.  The Supreme Court allowed and in fact didn’t even debate the ban on machine guns as being lawful.   The Supreme Court only looked at the law passed by Congress, accepted it as law and looked to see if bump stocks fit the legal definition as passed by Congress and signed by the president.  The easy answer was no, it did not and the ATF was making up their own definition which is unconstitutional.  In another comment you stated that bump stocks serve “no valuable purpose”. I agree but do we throw out the Constitution? We don’t need neo nazis  or klan members rhetoric either but are willing to pick and choose who gets free speech? I support the Supreme Court decision on an item that I don’t want even if you gave me one. I support it because it follows statutory law and the Constitution.  Do you suggest that the Supreme Court ignore the Constitution for political or dislike purposes? 
    • How would cracking down on crime prevented have what happened in Vegas?   The law of the land is no automatic weapons. If you get caught with a switch on your Glock, it’s a problem.  But you can legally modify your AR to get the same results? It’s a loophole that shouldn’t be there legally, and gun owners should boycott.    I love my AR. I believe everybody should get one. But there’s a big difference between a 30 round mag that’s fired semi-automatically, with at least the possibility of aiming at particular targets…. And a bump stop equipped AR that quite simply can’t be aimed. When the left argues that an AR serves no purpose, I disagree. But when some 2A nut is arguing that their fully automatic AR (by why of a bumpstock which renders the weapon useless in regards to accurate fire) is legal, I have to disagree, too.   
    • It will depend on how many kids move to Crosby this year. Last year they lost 2.
    • The fried brains will vote for him, and a few of them are on here.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...