Bridge City ineligible player ???

[fox]

On 4/18/2019 at 1:04 PM, STiger85 said:

Wrong. IF the kids are punished it will be because of a coaches decision about a rule. He is the one responsible for the team and knowing the rules. I'm sure there are different results for different rules broken according to UIL. It's a wait and see now. 

didn't PNG have to forfeit a game for a coach having a IPAD in the press box? 

[AllSportsMom]

22 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

Is GameChanger the official book?  I know ours is wrong about half of the time

Game changer just shows he’s on both rosters... 

[BC2010]

1 hour ago, dfreeman said:

It's not speculation, it's fact.

I wouldn’t doubt it. 

[STiger85]

1 hour ago, fox said:

didn't PNG have to forfeit a game for a coach having a IPAD in the press box? 

You testing my memory fox, but I seem to remember something about a IPAD and PNG don’t remember what came about it. 

[Waterboys]

I thought it was HJ that turned them in

[MrUmp1]

3 hours ago, STiger85 said:

You testing my memory fox, but I seem to remember something about a IPAD and PNG don’t remember what came about it. 

It was for using a video device illegally . Watching film during a game.

[AggiesAreWe]

53 minutes ago, Waterboys said:

I thought it was HJ that turned them in

Nope

[demons95]

I’d be willing to bet it wasn’t HJ. 

[HOTROD309]

6 hours ago, STiger85 said:

You testing my memory fox, but I seem to remember something about a IPAD and PNG don’t remember what came about it. 

That was football 

[T-daddy]

It was a disgruntled BC parent that made the complaint to the UIL... guess his kid wasn’t getting the playing time he thought he deserved... 

[WOSgrad]

1 hour ago, T-daddy said:

It was a disgruntled BC parent that made the complaint to the UIL... guess his kid wasn’t getting the playing time he thought he deserved... 

See?  This is what I meant earlier about speculation of who reported alleged infractions to the UIL.  Since I called for the quelling of speculation, 3 differing posters have set out 3 different parties as the reporting policy and all swearing on their grandmother's graves that they knew that the info that they had was the absolute story, one going so far as to tell me that his version was not speculation but rather "fact."  Such disparity leads me to believe that many who are proffering such theories here have absolutely no clue as to the real story is. 

This is especially maddening as KF89 has indicated earlier, who reported it has little relevance here.

I tried to do this the easy way....now comes the hard way.  There will be no more speculation as the to the source of reports of the alleged infractions against the BC baseball team. Period.

 

[Peppermint Patty]

14 hours ago, WOSgrad said:

See?  This is what I meant earlier about speculation of who reported alleged infractions to the UIL.  Since I called for the quelling of speculation, 3 differing posters have set out 3 different parties as the reporting policy and all swearing on their grandmother's graves that they knew that the info that they had was the absolute story, one going so far as to tell me that his version was not speculation but rather "fact."  Such disparity leads me to believe that many who are proffering such theories here have absolutely no clue as to the real story is. 

This is especially maddening as KF89 has indicated earlier, who reported it has little relevance here.

I tried to do this the easy way....now comes the hard way.  There will be no more speculation as the to the source of reports of the alleged infractions against the BC baseball team. Period.

 

It was Colonel Mustard.

In the library.

With a candlestick.

[WOSgrad]

5 minutes ago, Bandwagon Ranger said:

It was Colonel Mustard.

In the library.

With a candlestick.

Andy, only because that one provided a much needed comedic break, you get a pass. LOL!

 

[Peppermint Patty]

10 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Andy, only because that one provided a much needed comedic break, you get a pass. LOL!

 

I'll be here all week.

[WOSgrad]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

No decision has been made on the possible use of an ineligible player by Bridge City's baseball team during a portion of district play. Another meeting is scheduled for tomorrow.

[demons95]

I thought they know it happened, but they are just trying to decide if they get penalized?  Statement above sounds like they are trying to determine if it even happened. Two different situations. If it didn’t happen there is nothing to decide on. If it did happen and there is no repercussions, watch out from here on out because anyone caught doing something will refer to this. Just my two cents which is not worth a nickel. Lol

[CajunFried]

Two cents is never worth a nickel....just saying

[demons95]

49 minutes ago, CajunFried said:

Not true. 1865 2 cent piece is about $500

[CajunFried]

Touché didn’t realize we were dealin in 1966 time. Still thought it was funny. 

[CardinalBacker]

Enough of the speculation.  

 

It was I.

 

 

[Horns89]

Just heard BC forfeited 3 games.

[Baseballer10]

If so which 3 games?

[LCMAlumtiger32]

4 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Enough of the speculation.  

 

It was I.

 

 

I don’t blame you. I know your tired of football kids quitting to play baseball 

[Critter]

So, if this JV kid played to many games on varsity could BC forfeit (3) JV games?  Seems like he played to many JV games     Just gotta laugh at all the teams (2 Teams) hoping that the forfeited games are district games so that they can move up in the district standings... Please allow me time to get back with popcorn before anybody responds so I can enjoy the reading

[AllSportsMom]

 If he was ineligible it would start with the first ineligible game  followed by those there after.