Jump to content

KIrbyville at Bridge City Scrimmage/Post comments here!

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Lord knows that I don't think a lot of Tommy Wallis, but from my view of things, he appears that he was to trying to be a peacemaker in this situation and was trying to separate a Cardinal and a Wildcat.  That hand looks to be one of a Kirbyville player that the BC player is involved with (you can see the Wildcat's black helmet over the left shoulder of the ref closest to the camera).  Of course, this is a still which doesn't reveal everything.

But given the way Coach DuBois feels about his kids, if he felt this was an act of aggression on Dr. Wallis' part, we would have heard something to that effect by now by BC administration by now.

I thought the same thing at first, but I think the Kirbyville kid is dark skinned and that's a white LEFT hand on the BC kid's throat.... knuckles facing the camera. 

I may have been watching too much CSI. 

Honestly, Dubois isn't going to say anything. He was all over our kids, and I doubt He would even recognize Dr. Wallis. 

I've also decided that from now on I shall capitalize all pronouns used when discussing our Coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rykerx144

rykerx144

Posted
Posted

I have a video also.  It was not real aggressive and yes it appears the Kville kid was the one choking him.  The video was so distorted its hard to see details but one I noticed  If our sup was separating our kids you would have seen him facing our kids walking them back.   That didn't happen.  He ran into the pack.  Obviously pushing bc kids back then staring them down.  I wouldn't say he broke any rules technically violated any policy but as sup you just don't do that.  He Is a bully and eventually you people are going to see this.  

There were several fights with center, now with BC.  The one practice I went to there was fight they had to break up.  I do not like where things are headed. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fox

fox

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

He's a menace. Lol.  

Honestly, it looks like somebody's white hand (his) is on the BC player's throat.

I'm certain that the picture doesn't actually represent what was occurring, but that looks bad.  

 

the point being why is he even on the field? let the coaches do their job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Makemineaconvertible said:

I really don't see it as him having intent on choking a BC player. He was out there trying to  seperate two sides.   Something that both coaching staffs should have done   

As a general rule it's about getting your own kids out of the mix... not shoving somebody else's kids. 

Deleted by admin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • UT alum
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By UT alum · Posted

    • CardinalBacker
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...