Jump to content

Thank You MR. Cavness


5GallonBucket

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, gohornets23 said:

sorry...don't get much time in front of the computer

yes I'd have no problem with a transgender woman going to the same bathroom as my daughter (who is four) at the same time

I'd be much more wary of letting my son who (7) spend time alone with a priest 

 

Lol, you must not spend much time, you didn't answer the question.   As for as your prejudice comment about Priest, the percentage of Priest identified as pedofiles, is lower than the general population as a whole.  So, you accept the transgender over the Priest, how sad.  I will pray for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, stevenash said:

Okay Lum, I'll give you my answer.  All of us are human and one of our COMMON DENOMINATORS is the uneasiness to change.   You people have a history of being scared of change. Yall get bent out of shape and (sometimes) carry things too far. Your people allow fear , prejudice, etc to rule your thoughts and actions.  So , you are saying because a person who is physically a man but identifies a woman is going to rape little girls in the bathroom? Hmmm, your logic sounds eerily familiar to some other past transgenders ...err... transgressions recorded throughout history.

 

IT WOULD APPEAR YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT MORE THAN BATHROOM LINES!!!

YEP!!   CHANGE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

What a shame...you have no problem with it, don't seem to worry if your daughter would.

That's where my concern lies (with the kids) and it seems Dr. Cavness as well.

Have to agree with Whoa...awful strange that you feel your kids are safer in the presence of someone obviously confused about what they are than a Priest.

Remember LRF, your question involved a transgender man, not a transgender women.  We'll have to wait for that answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

These guys seem to be only concerned with the transgender...not worried at all how it will affect the children.

Grown men and grown women (transgender or not) have no business in a bathroom or locker room with children of the opposite sex...period.

Speaking of women in the locker room, I seem to remember you people were a little upset about that issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, REBgp said:

Lol, you must not spend much time, you didn't answer the question.   As for as your prejudice comment about Priest, the percentage of Priest identified as pedofiles, is lower than the general population as a whole.  So, you accept the transgender over the Priest, how sad.  I will pray for you.

Anybody have data on transgender pedophiles? Maybe the data will show their population is below the general population as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/17/2016 at 9:12 PM, REBgp said:

I think BD3, that one thing most of us are concerned about is a pervert, who preys on young girls, who claims to be a transgender so he can access the girls bathroom.   

Personally, I wouldn't have a problem sharing a bathroom with a transgender.  My main concern is my wife, daughter, and granddaughter.

Huh? Man your  prejudices are seeping through this thread. So, maybe the real reason here is that a person who is different from you, which makes you feel uncomfortable because they are different, qualifies them to be put on the pervert list. So, your scenario is that we are going to get an increase of transgenders preying on the young. 

Secondly, you want to give us this movie script of perverts dressing as women to access the girl's restroom & prey on young girls.

:  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Still no answer...you people???...hmmm.

You people is meant to be derogatory, it shows prejudice, is racist, profiling, and stereotyping......Everything he is supposedly against, yet there it is. Like I said, two faced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Huh? Man your  prejudices are seeping through this thread. So, maybe the real reason here is that a person who is different from you, which makes you feel uncomfortable because they are different, qualifies them to be put on the pervert list. So, your scenario is that we are going to get an increase of transgenders preying on the young. 

Secondly, you want to give us this movie script of perverts dressing as women to access the girl's restroom & prey on young girls.

:  

I'm surprised at you Dove.  You usually read a post before replying.   Maybe you ought to re-read mine.  Either that, are your prejudices are seeping through.  I tried to reply in a sensible, reasonable manner.  I don't have problems with transgenders if they are born that way.

Secondly, I never heard (not that it's never happened) of perverts cross dressing to go in girls bathrooms.   This decree will give Any man the right to go into a girls bathroom, no matter how they're dressed.  They won't have to dress as a woman.  Jeans and cowboy boots.  Three piece suit.  Who's going to ask them if they're TG?   You?  Me?   If we do, we'd probably get sued as LGBTphobes.   If you can answer that problem with a sensible, reasonable response, it'll alleviate my fears. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, REBgp said:

I'm surprised at you Dove.  You usually read a post before replying.   Maybe you ought to re-read mine.  Either that, are your prejudices are seeping through.  I tried to reply in a sensible, reasonable manner.  I don't have problems with transgenders if they are born that way.

Secondly, I never heard (not that it's never happened) of perverts cross dressing to go in girls bathrooms.   This decree will give Any man the right to go into a girls bathroom, no matter how they're dressed.  They won't have to dress as a woman.  Jeans and cowboy boots.  Three piece suit.  Who's going to ask them if they're TG?   You?  Me?   If we do, we'd probably get sued as LGBTphobes.   If you can answer that problem with a sensible, reasonable response, it'll alleviate my fears. 

I read your post :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, NDNation said:

So if you go into the DMV and you have male parts but you associate as a female, will they list female on your drivers license?

No, they didn't list it on their birth certificate, don't expect it on any other official form. What they don't get to choose is their sex...what they get to choose is how to act. 

On this subject, I am aware that some people (very very very few) ARE actually born with BOTH sexual organs....now those are the ones, the ONLY ones we should be discussing.

Just because you identify better with a group that you weren't born as, doesn't mean you become that....some blacks are accused of being "to white" (whatever that means) for identifying with what some believe to be white ideals. This doesn't make them white, or not black enough...it's just what they believe. They can't change their birth certificates, they can't check the "white" box under race. They can even bleach themselves (Michael Jackson) and it still DOES NOT make them white....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CraigS said:

No, they didn't list it on their birth certificate, don't expect it on any other official form. What they don't get to choose is their sex...what they get to choose is how to act. 

On this subject, I am aware that some people (very very very few) ARE actually born with BOTH sexual organs....now those are the ones, the ONLY ones we should be discussing.

Just because you identify better with a group that you weren't born as, doesn't mean you become that....some blacks are accused of being "to white" (whatever that means) for identifying with what some believe to be white ideals. This doesn't make them white, or not black enough...it's just what they believe. They can't change their birth certificates, they can't check the "white" box under race. They can even bleach themselves (Michael Jackson) and it still DOES NOT make them white....

This is what I'm getting at. If its not getting changed on official documents, why is it being changed in bathrooms that kids use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Dove, should Rachel Dolezal have been able to change her ethnic identity on her drivers license  and other official records?  After all, this is what she felt she was.

I can give one example FOR SURE I had a 11th grader enroll who was 100% black-  no doubt about it -   and mom said he was anglo  so that's what the Counselor's  did

put down the race they stated which was obviously wrong

don't know how the DMV or jail would view it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Whoa said:

I can give one example FOR SURE I had a 11th grader enroll who was 100% black-  no doubt about it -   and mom said he was anglo  so that's what the Counselor's  did

put down the race they stated which was obviously wrong

don't know how the DMV or jail would view it

In most cases, the school admins are as dumb as the fed gov....that's why Cavness and company standing up for the "normal" people is such appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Yall fishing now.

I look at it as the government trying to throw them a bone without REALLY having to deal with it. Just let them use whatever restroom they want, but it's not OFFICIAL if they can't change it on Official and government documents. So why are we even doing this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Craig, I must ask do you really believe Admin are dumb?  By definition you must have at least a Masters.  I know it is popular for rednecks to dog teachers, admin, etc...but disagree in a somewhat intelligent manner.

Showing your a#%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whoa said:

Craig, I must ask do you really believe Admin are dumb?  By definition you must have at least a Masters.  I know it is popular for rednecks to dog teachers, admin, etc...but disagree in a somewhat intelligent manner.

Showing your a#%

So is disagreeing with someone in an intelligent manner entail throwing out racial slurs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whoa said:

Craig, I must ask do you really believe Admin are dumb?  By definition you must have at least a Masters.  I know it is popular for rednecks to dog teachers, admin, etc...but disagree in a somewhat intelligent manner.

Showing your a#%

Plenty of formally educated people that are void of common sense/logic , especially at the Federal level.  And part of their problem is the true belief that they know so much more about what is good for the average guy as opposed to the average guy knowing what is good for himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

So which bathroom would Caitlyn Bruce use when this happens...so confusing.

 

I'm getting confused. Is Bruce transgender or transsexual? Does he still have man parts and taking hormones to grow breasts? Isn't transgender just feeling like you're the opposite sex? Like Shiloh Pitt.

I can see a man that has transitioned into a woman using the ladies room. I can't see a man that just feels like a woman using the ladies room.

Wow, look how far humans have come, we can just change our sex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
    • 🤣🤣🤣  Right on schedule!!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...