Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 2/25/2016 at 6:12 PM, REBgp said:

Interesting.  I looked up Super Pacs.  I still don't quite understand.  I thot they were independent of the candidates, now I'm not sure.  I would hope most are on the up & up, for the candidate or the country, but I suspect it's fertile ground for all kind of bs.  

I understood about the Bush to Rubio money.  At least that makes sense.  

I'm still firmly convinced that the RNC & DNC control most of our elected Govt Officials.  Not what the Founding Fathers had in mind.  

Expand  

Super PACs are supposed to be independent, although as pointed out in a previous post, they often trade staff with the campaigns, employ friends or big financial backers of the candidate, etc.

I'll be fair. Where his campaign is concerned, Cruz has one of the best grassroots operation in the race. He's received more small donations as a proportion of his overall fundraising total than any other GOP candidate. But the truth is the polar opposite with respect to the Super PACs that support him. And you'll notice that in that same metric, Rick Perry places third, and he hasn't been in the race for months.

Here's a friendly word of advice. If you ever want to find out who really makes the tea party movement in the State of Texas work, take a drive around Uptown the next time you're in Dallas. You're bound to run across seven or eight of 'em. The candidates may come from Houston, but the money comes from the Metroplex.

Posted

Here's what boggles my mind.  It's been evident to me that Trump was on a roll, so surely the RNC could see it.  Now, if I heard right, they're trying to figure a way to beat him.  My feeble brain tells me it's too late.  They also didn't want Cruz, who's in second.  Knock knock RNC, maybe you need to embrace whoever the voters pick and start consolidating your efforts toward beating Hillary.  And to show y'all how smart I am, I thought there was no way a lying, no class, felon would get the Dem nomination.  My 1970's, 1980's logic is so far out of sync with today's electorate it's pathetic.  I need to charge my Flux Capacitor.   There was a candidate in my youth, Alfred E Neuman.  He could win now as a Democrat. 

Posted
  On 3/3/2016 at 2:50 AM, REBgp said:

Here's what boggles my mind.  It's been evident to me that Trump was on a roll, so surely the RNC could see it.  Now, if I heard right, they're trying to figure a way to beat him.  My feeble brain tells me it's too late.  They also didn't want Cruz, who's in second.  Knock knock RNC, maybe you need to embrace whoever the voters pick and start consolidating your efforts toward beating Hillary.  And to show y'all how smart I am, I thought there was no way a lying, no class, felon would get the Dem nomination.  My 1970's, 1980's logic is so far out of sync with today's electorate it's pathetic.  I need to charge my Flux Capacitor.   There was a candidate in my youth, Alfred E Neuman.  He could win now as a Democrat. 

Expand  

lol...now there's a blast from the past!

What, Me Worry?

Posted
  On 3/6/2016 at 11:01 PM, smitty said:

Hummmm...

This is the hidden content, please

Expand  

Heard part of an interview with who I think was a Republican Congressman, and he was saying that the establishment was so concerned that Trump was going to win that they're almost ready to embrace Cruz.  

And the crowning statement came this morning, from a Fox News lady who described Cruz as "an ultra conservative".  Never thought wanting to enforce the Constitution would get someone labeled an ultra conservative. 

Posted
  On 3/7/2016 at 12:26 AM, REBgp said:

Heard part of an interview with who I think was a Republican Congressman, and he was saying that the establishment was so concerned that Trump was going to win that they're almost ready to embrace Cruz.  

And the crowning statement came this morning, from a Fox News lady who described Cruz as "an ultra conservative".  Never thought wanting to enforce the Constitution would get someone labeled an ultra conservative. 

Expand  

Oh yeah...promoting policies of lower taxes, smaller gov and following the Constitution are considered "radical" by many.

Funny how you never hear the term "ultra-liberal" used by the media.

Posted
  On 3/7/2016 at 12:26 AM, REBgp said:

Heard part of an interview with who I think was a Republican Congressman, and he was saying that the establishment was so concerned that Trump was going to win that they're almost ready to embrace Cruz.  

And the crowning statement came this morning, from a Fox News lady who described Cruz as "an ultra conservative".  Never thought wanting to enforce the Constitution would get someone labeled an ultra conservative. 

Expand  

Funny how defending the constitution suddenly involves social issues.

Posted
  On 3/8/2016 at 12:43 AM, westend1 said:

Funny how defending the constitution suddenly involves social issues.

Expand  

Not funny at all when a Supreme Court Justice appointed by Hillary will empower that court to overturn the 2nd Amendment and take away our right to own guns. 

Posted
  On 3/8/2016 at 2:18 AM, REBgp said:

Not funny at all when a Supreme Court Justice appointed by Hillary will empower that court to overturn the 2nd Amendment and take away our right to own guns. 

Expand  

Cool!  I'm a bow hunter.  Don't need the competition.  LOL

Posted

And here's the thing many of us have anticipated.  It's ironic that many of the Founding Fathers thot the media would be a watchdog over our democracy, and it was for many years.  Now it's a tool for the left.  

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
  On 3/7/2016 at 12:26 AM, REBgp said:

Heard part of an interview with who I think was a Republican Congressman, and he was saying that the establishment was so concerned that Trump was going to win that they're almost ready to embrace Cruz.  

Expand  

What you heard was correct. Make no mistake, the establishment does not like Ted Cruz, and frankly, they have very, very good reason not to. But Ted Cruz will set the party back a decade whereas Donald Trump will send it down in a blaze so cataclysmic that it will go down in history as the most divisive end to any American political movement, ever. Between those two poisons, the establishment will pick the former.

Posted
  On 3/8/2016 at 9:54 PM, PN-G bamatex said:

What you heard was correct. Make no mistake, the establishment does not like Ted Cruz, and frankly, they have very, very good reason not to. But Ted Cruz will set the party back a decade whereas Donald Trump will send it down in a blaze so cataclysmic that it will go down in history as the most divisive end to any American political movement, ever. Between those two poisons, the establishment will pick the former.

Expand  

Well I'll cement my reputation for being a conspiracy theorists with this question.  Do any of you think that Trump was encouraged to run by his Democratic friends?

And before any of you write me off as a nut, do a little research on the number of times our Govt has lied to us.  I use to trust them too. 

Posted
  On 3/9/2016 at 12:09 AM, REBgp said:

Well I'll cement my reputation for being a conspiracy theorists with this question.  Do any of you think that Trump was encouraged to run by his Democratic friends?

And before any of you write me off as a nut, do a little research on the number of times our Govt has lied to us.  I use to trust them too. 

Expand  

Buddy, that's no conspiracy theory.

Posted
  On 3/8/2016 at 9:54 PM, PN-G bamatex said:

What you heard was correct. Make no mistake, the establishment does not like Ted Cruz, and frankly, they have very, very good reason not to. But Ted Cruz will set the party back a decade whereas Donald Trump will send it down in a blaze so cataclysmic that it will go down in history as the most divisive end to any American political movement, ever. Between those two poisons, the establishment will pick the former.

Expand  

That's the same thing they said about Ronald Reagan.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Member Statistics

    46,284
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Lpfan13
    Newest Member
    Lpfan13
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...